Author, Declaratory Judgments —
Trademark cases not immune from MedImmune: The potential for increased trademark infringement litigation?
Not exact matches
But a business that hasn't applied for copyrights or patents, registered its trade name and
trademark, or protected its trade secrets — and actively defended them — may have trouble making its
case in court.
In a federal
trademark infringement
case, for instance, a plaintiff seeking a quick injunction would encounter at the threshold the high hurdle of showing «irreparable harm» — a standard that won't be met if money damages will provide the plaintiff with adequate recompense for any damages incurred — and it might also have to post an expensive bond (a major hurdle for a nonprofit).
They have an e-book you can download too that actually has business names that you can either use, (in which
case make sure it's available in your state and
not trademarked like «Sew Special» might be) or at least have a bunch of names that can help your creative juices get going.
Just in
case you read about this in either Xinhua, Global Times or China Daily, please do
not think that anything has actually happened in the iPad
trademark dispute, or at least anything that can be verified.
Filing a
trademark violation
case for using the world «Fortune» which they knew was owned by Time Magazine, and
not them, was just a way to take advantage of the system by someone with more money that the poor defendant had.
Oh, and in
case you were wondering, the
trademark «X» marking this bread didn't come about because it was invented by straight edge warriors.
Trademarks that are located within or on the Website or a website otherwise owned or operated in conjunction with Orlando Stroller Rentals, LLC shall
not be deemed to be in the public domain but rather the exclusive property of Orlando Stroller Rentals, LLC, unless such website is under license from the
Trademark owner thereof in which
case such license is for the exclusive benefit and use of Orlando Stroller Rentals, LLC, unless otherwise stated.
The company says it doesn't have close enough ties with Free People to be implicated in the
trademark infringement
case.
However, the judge contended that a reputation is
not enough and reminded PlentyofFish that this was
case regarding the
trademark of a dating site
not advertising services.
Mazda registered
trademarks for both the RX - 7 and RX - 9 nameplates just in
case things move forward in the near future, but we're
not holding our breath.
Tarnow also noted that Chrysler does
not have a
trademark on «Imported from Detroit» and rejected the automaker's argument that
trademark law is
not applicable to the
case.
Though
not all Rhodesian Ridgebacks have the
trademark ridge, it an unusual
case for an animal
not to possess one.
In
case the title and picture didn't give it away the name
trademarked was Gears of War: Exile — possibly the same game that was supposed to be announced at the Spike TV Game Awards before being pulled out at the last minute.
This in isolation isn't anything out of the ordinary — companies are always setting up new accounts on social media and registering
trademarks, just in
case — but then I stumbled across the name SEGA Forever again.
Correlation does
not imply causation, and such
trademark had been registered before in 2009, so it might just a
trademark registered «just in
case», but... let the speculation begin!
More often than
not, the consequences of
not carrying out a full
trademark validation process can be more serious than those outlined in the
case above.
Like
trademarks, copyrights may be registered — in this
case, with the US Copyright Office — but works are protected by copyright even if they are
not registered.
In
case the
trademark isn't approved because it is already in use by some other company, I could just change it to Hoogas Woogas or something like that.
Delivering his opinion in the joined
cases of C - 236 / 08, C - 237 / 08 and C - 238/08, Advocate General Poiares Maduro said Google did
not infringe anyone's
trademark rights by selling keywords corresponding to those
trademarks.
However, the good news for Louboutin was overshadowed in the present
case, by the court's conclusion that the monochromatic Yves Saint Laurent shoe did
not infringe the Louboutin
trademark: the upper colour of Louboutin's shoes always contrasted with the red soles, whereas Yves Saint Laurent marketed shoes which were entirely red.
For
trademark, the most significant court
case is TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., which held that
trademark can
not restrict distribution of functional components.
On the other hand and on the same day, the GC issued its Judgment of 10 October 2012 in
case Case T - 569 / 10 Bimbo v OHMI — Panrico (BIMBO DOUGHNUTS), where the challenger of OHIM's decision contended, among other grounds for appeal, that OHIM had not expressly addressed some of the arguments presented during the trademark review proced
case Case T - 569 / 10 Bimbo v OHMI — Panrico (BIMBO DOUGHNUTS), where the challenger of OHIM's decision contended, among other grounds for appeal, that OHIM had not expressly addressed some of the arguments presented during the trademark review proced
Case T - 569 / 10 Bimbo v OHMI — Panrico (BIMBO DOUGHNUTS), where the challenger of OHIM's decision contended, among other grounds for appeal, that OHIM had
not expressly addressed some of the arguments presented during the
trademark review procedure.
As for the
cases on non-use of rights, clients often use a
trademark not by themselves but entrust this task to their partners, affiliated persons, which causes certain difficulties by proving use of the
trademark, which also bothers the client.
Bob is a trial attorney with extensive experience in
cases involving trade secrets, covenants
not to compete,
trademark infringement, software licenses, copyright infringement and patent infringement, as well as other commercial litigation matters.
That means that the
cases involve questions of infringement on prints and patterns,
not trademarked logos such as Gucci's interlocking Gs.
Courtney Culver Baker has experience throughout the State of Texas in both state and federal courts, as well as the Fifth Circuit, representing corporate,
not - for - profit and individual clients both in pursuing and defending
cases in areas including business and contract disputes, real estate, catastrophic personal injury, ad valorem taxation, securities disputes, insurance coverage, professional liability and
trademark infringement.
Los Angeles, CA (Law Firm Newswire) April 1, 2014 — The Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of Nike, Inc., in a
case concerning whether a covenant
not to enforce a
trademark can reliably moot a counterclaim of invalidity.
It does
not happen every day that you can see a
trademark case decided by the EU General Court with a Polish claimant (EUTM applicant), represented by his Polish attorney, with a Polish judge as the rapporteur and even with Polish national acting as the EUIPO's representative.
Therefore, some
trademark holders aggressively pursue even borderline
cases to ensure they don't endanger their
trademark.
The scope of the statutory privilege would apply in
cases where the
trademark agent is seeking to advise on «any matter» in respect of «the protection of a trade - mark, geographical indication or mark referred to in paragraph 9 (1)(e), (i), (i. 1), (i. 3), (
n) or (
n. 1)».
(If you come from the assumption that ZFS
trademark is invalid, what would be the
case if it was
not?)
You may
not, without Company's express written permission, (a) link to any part of the Site through the use of frames, inline links or any other similar technology whereby the content will be displayed without leaving the linking web site, (b) use any
trademark, logo or content as part of a link, and / or (c) create any link implying, intentionally or unintentionally, that an endorsement, sponsorship or affiliation with Company exists when that is
not the
case.
Should it the
case that the Delegates who voted in St John's in October of 2010, regarding the Consent Agreement, were
not made aware of this subject material point regarding
Trademark Law and REALTOR, it would be more than sufficient to invalidate the vote that took place in St.John's Nfld., regarding whether or
not to accept the Competition Consent Agreement!
Ross K and Harvey Exner: CREA's
trademark is the capitalized word REALTOR,
not the lower
case word «realtor» that is used elsewhere in the world, especially throughout the USA.
Ruling that the trial court did
not apply the proper test in analyzing the Website's fair use defense, the court sent the
case back to the trial court to apply the above test to determine whether the Website's use of the Companies»
trademarked terms constituted a fair use.