Sentences with phrase «traditional owner stated»

One Traditional Owner stated:

Not exact matches

Using state - of - the - art traditional and alternative medicine, surgery and nutrition to improve the health, happiness and longevity of pets, giving their owners the peace of mind they need to experience the true joy of pet ownership.

Therefore, owners of choppers, dirt bikes, sports bikes and traditional motorcycles must register their vehicles with the state.

The state, has also created the Indiana Auto Insurance Plan to help vehicle owners who have been turned down for traditional policies.

Therefore, owners of dirt bikes, sport bikes, choppers and traditional motorcycles must register their vehicles and carry the state - required liability insurance coverage.

For those unaware, Dolby Atmos is a relatively new standard of 3D surround sound that's built upon traditional 5.1 and 7.1 layouts, which means it should be fairly easy for owners to upgrade their setup to support the state - of - the - art technology.

A few statutes provide for compensation to be paid in recognition of the disturbance to traditional land from mining.77 A number of regimes provide for royalties, or an amount equivalent to the royalties received by the state or federal government, to be paid to the Indigenous owners.

To borrow a phrase used by my former clients, traditional owners from northwest Victoria — which was often used in negotiations with the State «its time to put some flesh on the bones» of these agreements and principles.

Earlier sections discuss the use of connection reports (section 1, Identification of the traditional owner group) and state governments» legalistic attitudes (section 7, Legal issues).

The rights of traditional owners should reflect the fact that, like other Australian citizens, they are members of a modern state involved in a global economy.

In subsequent discussions where I have expressed concern about the lack of community consultation on the issue of town leasing, the OIPC have also noted that they are not obliged under the legislation to consult with the community, just with a section of it, that is traditional owners, which the government has stated could mean just one person in some instances.

This means that state and Commonwealth governments, industry, and traditional owners must share the goal of sustainable development.

For example, in relation to a future act where the Victorian Government is a party, the state will require that traditional owners provide basic certainty about the identity of the group; description of claimed rights and interests; traditional basis of connection and some evidence of traditional physical connection to a part of the land under claim.

One NTRB stated that first and foremost, the process of capacity development should aim to empower the traditional owner group.

An example of this is in the recent agreement in South Australia between various exploration companies, the Yandruwandha / Yawarrawarrka Traditional Land Owners (Aboriginal Corporation), and the State government which established a process for agreed land access and usage.

As the Native Title Report 2003 detailed, a common theme of state and federal native title policies as they currently exist is a preference for negotiation over litigation.180 This agreement - focus provides an invaluable opportunity for governments and traditional owner groups to ensure that native title agreements respond as far as possible to the economic and social development needs of the native title claimant group rather than just the demands of the legal system.

Commendably, some state governments are explicitly guiding their various departments and agencies to engage with traditional owner groups as a particular part of the broader Indigenous community.

A number of respondents stated that resource development was not the only way traditional owners could work towards social and economic goals.

State governments must be commended for funding negotiations and other initiatives that increase the potential for beneficial economic and social development outcomes for traditional owner groups.

[14] Victorian Traditional Owner Land Justice Group, Towards a Framework Agreement between The State of Victoria and the Victorian Traditional Owner Land Justice Group, Discussion Paper, 26 August 2006, p 5.

The Murray - Darling River Basin is home to a number of Indigenous Traditional Owner groups across the five states and territory.

In addition, Commonwealth and state governments and NTRBs must recognise that the process of traditional owner decision making is just as important as the native title outcome.

Traditional owners» development initiatives occur within a system of interrelated levels and understandings, including the local, regional, state, national and international levels.

Negotiation threshold tests (28) differ from state to state but essentially require the claimants to provide to the state evidence that they are the biological descendants of the traditional owners, (29) that they can demonstrate continuing connection with the land of their forebears, and that they have continued to observe their traditional laws and customs.

In November 2006, the Group decided that its main purpose would be to negotiate a new policy framework with the state government so that native title could better meet the aspirations of traditional owners.

However, where there is an opportunity to give legal recognition to traditional owners inherent rights through consent determinations and particularly where such rights can provide a basis for or contribute to the economic, social and cultural development of the group, then governments, both State and Federal, should conduct the negotiations in such a way as to maximise this opportunity.

As indicated in my discussion of State and Territory policies (96) a preference for negotiation over litigation provides an invaluable opportunity for governments and traditional owner groups to ensure that native title agreements respond to policies directed to the economic and social development of the native title claim group rather than to the demands of the legal system.

Under this approach a state may enter into negotiations with the traditional owner group either through the mediation process offered under the NTA or by means of their own processes without waiting for the collection of evidence by the claimant group in relation to the continuity of their connection, the continuity of their observance of traditional laws and customs and the compilation of a tenure history by the state.

Over a year into negotiations with traditional owners over the location of a proposed LNG processing plant in Western Australia, the government of that state changed.

Some States, guided by a broader policy direction towards the economic and social development of traditional owner groups, proceed to negotiate with native title claim groups when they are certain that the group with whom they are negotiating are the traditional owners of the relevant land.

While there are many examples of native title agreements that do provide economic and social development outcomes for traditional owner groups these are not usually a result of applying native title policy goals, but rather come out of the intersection of native title with the States» other policy priorities.

The South Australian government's commitment to the State - wide ILUA negotiation process (also referred to as a State - wide Framework Agreement) means that native title negotiations involve a high level of participation by traditional owner groups.

Native title offers a process by which traditional owner groups are brought into a relationship with the State through the lodging of a native title claim.

In these cases the future act provisions of the NTA provide processes for the conduct of negotiations between the State and native title claimants and an opportunity for States to negotiate with traditional owner groups as if these groups had legally recognised rights to the land.

In contrast to the assessment model some States proceed to negotiate with native title claim groups prior to assessing the merits of their legal claim, so long as they are confident they are dealing with the traditional owner group.

In 2005, Native Title Services Victoria (NTSV), a service delivery body that performs some of the functions of a NTRB for the state of Victoria, supported the establishment of the Victorian Traditional Owner Land Justice Group (LJG) «to find a better way of doing business and achieving workable native title and land management outcomes in Victoria».

Using negotiation as the process by which a State develops its policy approach to traditional owner groups ensures that the development objectives identified by Indigenous people, rather than the objectives identified by the State, have a central place in that policy.

In February 2008, the Attorney - General stated that the government would ensure that Traditional Owners and their representatives were adequately resourced so that they are in a position to pursue beneficial outcomes.

Negotiation threshold tests, shaped by the legal tests, play a crucial role in determining whether, and if so how, the State will negotiate with traditional owner groups.

In addition, Prescribed Bodies Corporate have no funding source at all from the Commonwealth or State governments and are thus unable to provide a governing institution for the traditional owners» ongoing development.

In South Australia, in addition to the Aboriginal Lands Trust Act 1966 (SA) referred to above, there are two Acts each providing that large parts of the western part of the State are held as inalienable freehold by a corporation that directly represents traditional owners.46 A lease can be granted for any period to a traditional owner or organisation comprising traditional owners; to a government agency for up to 50 years; or to anyone else for 5 years or less.47 The Anangu Pitjantjatjara corporation must have regard to the interests of and consult with traditional owners with a particular interest in the affected portion of the lands and shall not approve the lease unless it is satisfied that those people have given their informed consent.48 The Maralinga Tjarutja corporation must consult with traditional owners.49

(4) It was also discussed in Chapter 3 how many state Governments are conducting native title negotiations within this narrow legal framework by focusing primarily on the settlement of native title claims rather than the economic and social development of the traditional owner group.

A historic meeting of Traditional Owners of Victoria was convened with the meeting endorsing a statement calling on the State Government to consider a raft of land justice measures.

However, in November 2009 the Victorian Traditional Owner Land Justice Group expressed concerned that the Victorian Settlement Framework was «in jeopardy as a result of disagreement over funding between the State and Commonwealth Governments».

[62] The Victorian Settlement Framework «provides for out of court settlement packages that allow Traditional Owners to settle their land claim directly with the State outside the Federal Court process».

I congratulate the State of Victoria and the Traditional Owners of Victoria on this significant achievement.

The statement calls on the State Government to commit to a process of negotiation with the Traditional Owners of Victoria; consider traditional owners preferred model for cultural heritage and engage in a process of negotiation for land justice settlement iTraditional Owners of Victoria; consider traditional owners preferred model for cultural heritage and engage in a process of negotiation for land justice settlement in VicOwners of Victoria; consider traditional owners preferred model for cultural heritage and engage in a process of negotiation for land justice settlement itraditional owners preferred model for cultural heritage and engage in a process of negotiation for land justice settlement in Vicowners preferred model for cultural heritage and engage in a process of negotiation for land justice settlement in Victoria.

[144] It does so by authorising the creation of a series of agreements between the State of Victoria and entities which represent traditional owner groups.

I urge the Government to support conservation efforts of Traditional Owners through join - management of national park arrangements under ILUAs or State land rights regimes, and recognise these practices as eligible projects under the CFI.

[140] The Framework «provides for out of court settlement packages that allow Traditional Owners to settle their land claim directly with the State outside the Federal Court processes».