Traditional publishing An author who wishes to go the traditional route must have, above all, tenacity and a thick skin.
In fact,
traditional published authors who follow that route to publication also find it almost impossible to find an agent or publisher if they aren't doing the same thing that successful indie authors have been doing for years --- building a social networking author's platform.
The reality is that most authors self - publishing: a) Woudn't be able to get representation by an agent much less at an agency like Trident b) Are former
traditional published author who either couldn't get another contract or opted to self - publish because it offered them something they consider better c) Were tired of chasing the dream of a traditional contract and decided to go the self - publishing route.
Not exact matches
Traditional publishers will even get in on the game, only
publishing an
author who commits to buying a certain number of their own books.
King Arthur represents the legion of
authors who have tried to get
published through
traditional means for scores of years, only to be told «None shall pass!»
Some terrific
traditional publishing opportunities have also been created for
authors who have successfully self -
published.
The old vanity
publishing offered
authors who could not attract the interest of a
traditional publisher an opportunity to get their books
published.
I know so many pro self -
published authors now
who have made six - figures + from their books that I know
traditional publishing is NOT the path for me (at least not'til they make it worth my wild)
I don't know how many, but you can be sure that a lot of the
authors who eventually self -
published first tried to get a
traditional publisher.
In the
traditional publishing world, agents and editors sing the praises of
authors who meet deadlines.
Traditional publishing is the gold standard to which all indie
authors must aspire, and people
who work around books can give you pointers or tell you if you're on the right track or not.
Where a
traditional publisher may offer a royalty rate of 25 % of net sales,
authors who handle every aspect of
publishing their book keep all the profits if they can cover their costs.
Modern
authors often choose the present tense to add edginess and immediacy to a story, but the more
traditional use of past tense is generally better loved by big
publishing companies,
who are increasingly risk averse for financial reasons.Tales abound of
authors instructed by commercial publishers to rewrite an entire book to change the tense from present to past, before thy'll consider
publishing it.
# 1 The Acknowledgment that
Traditional Publishing Is Broken — Goodbye Snob Factor Just a decade ago, already published authors, the publishing community and the public in general looked down their noses at those who didn't publish via
Publishing Is Broken — Goodbye Snob Factor Just a decade ago, already
published authors, the
publishing community and the public in general looked down their noses at those who didn't publish via
publishing community and the public in general looked down their noses at those
who didn't
publish via New York.
For many
authors who've pursued or considered pursuing
traditional publishing contracts, a huge part of the overall appeal is two things:
But here's the thing: there's only one
author in the world right now
who has made two million dollars from self -
published e-book sales and another two million dollars on a newly - inked
traditional deal.
The fact is,
traditional publishers will not
publish a new
author who doesn't have a platform.
I got the impression that even if you
publish with a
traditional publisher, you're still expected to do all of the things a self -
published author is supposed to do: blog, network, sign books, endear yourself to any stranger
who might buy your book or
who knows someone
who might appreciate your prose.
I think many
authors who are rejecting «print» in reality are reacting to that
traditional publishing process's gatekeepers and middlemen.
It's fairly well - known that self -
publishing once carried a stigma (some would argue it still does), and that it was considered primarily a fall - back plan for
authors who couldn't find an agent or
traditional publisher to work with them.
In their blog post announcing the Macmillan acquisition, they state that, «
Authors who want or need more support will be able to join additional paid tiers for a revenue share — or may have the opportunity to transition to a
traditional publishing contract.»
Yes, there are some great
authors out there
who self -
publish, or bounce back and forth between
traditional and self -
publishing.
I believe you would best be described as a «hybird»
author, i.e. someone
who has written well enough in the past to have work survive the
traditional vetting process and be professionally
published.
They frequently cite that most of the Amazon bestsellers are written by indie
authors and that they are earning more money than writers
who get a
traditional publishing deal.
Traditional publishing houses are sweating, and
authors who went through the grueling process of courting them, and waiting (and waiting and waiting) are now feeling the sting, as people
who do it themselves are surpassing them by making more money for their efforts.
I take issue with the gentleman
who commented that
authors published by a
traditional house either know someone in the business or are good schmoozers.
Authors carve the creative control over their work, and they've come to realize that self -
publishing affords them an almost equal chance for income potential as a
traditional publishing deal, as evidenced largely by the fact that 24.8 % of those
who responded said they'd
published through a
traditional publisher
who offered a royalty split, but
who did not pay them an advance.
Join those of us
who are tired of being dictated to by a few large
traditional publishers, snobbish reviewers, and uninformed columnists, and buy ebooks
published by real people for real people — Indie
Authors.
At the same time, electronic
publishing has allowed brilliant
authors who are controversial and can't find a
traditional deal, or, did not care to wait years to
publish, an opportunity to share their work and get paid more equitably for it.
There are many great and experienced editors in
traditional publishing who can help a book become better for the
author, but at this point, with
traditional publishing in the state it's in, I'll take my chances on a couple of friends reading the book.
More than half of
authors who already were self -
published, as well as hybrid
authors, were hoping to
publish with
traditional publishers, at 53.5 percent and 57.8 percent, respectively.
I am one of those — a hybrid
author who has used
traditional publishers and self
publishing — and the reasons others cite line up with my own,
But lately, a lot of self
published authors are answering calls from agents and editors
who want them to consider a
traditional publishing deal.
With the term «indie publisher» being used more and more to describe an
author who has started their own
publishing company, what has happened to the «
traditional publisher?»
Yes,
traditional publishers are all competing for the important in - store shelf space, but there are enough self
published authors who are selling gangbusters in ebooks,
who would do well on shelves.
Force, a New York Times and USA Today contemporary romance
author who has written more than 50 books, was at the forefront of the indie
publishing wave in 2010 when she self -
published books that had been rejected by
traditional publishers.
I used to stress about bad reviews, my ego throbbing like a bee sting, but then I read something by Indie
author John Locke (
who set the record for eBook sales and is starting to turn «
traditional publishing» into a bad word) that completely changed the game:
-- 59.4 per cent of self -
publishing authors do so to have creative and financial control over their work, followed by just over one - third
who were unable to interest a
traditional publisher in their work.
While the program is in beta, only
authors who are
published through Amazon's
traditional publishing arm, Amazon Publishing, can pa
publishing arm, Amazon
Publishing, can pa
Publishing, can participate.
Those of you
who have read her articles in the past know that they are not short, but you also know that they're worth reading in their entirety — especially if you are a
published author (self OR
traditional).
As
authors moved towards circumventing
traditional publishers or small presses
who required that a book be accepted in order to be
published in return for payment (one hopes), we saw the advent of vanity presses and assorted
publishing opportunists.
And we have many
authors who are taking a «hybrid» path and are
publishing both with
traditional houses and also self - pubbing.
We've provided a lot of
authors,
who've spent in some cases decades being rejected by the
traditional houses, the chance to finally hold a
published copy of their book.
This includes: 1) Unpublished
authors that are just getting started, 2) Self -
published authors who now want to find a
traditional publisher, and 3) Previously
published authors that have lost their agent and / or publisher and want to find a new one.
I have other friends
who take the hybrid route,
publishing with both
traditional publishers and as indie
authors.
Traditional publishing used to be the only game in town for
authors who wanted a fair shake financially.
It means an
author who chooses to
publish some books with
traditional publishers and some books as an indie
author.
And
authors who were either ignored or rejected by
traditional publishers can now
publish their own books through those self -
publishing options.
Recently, I responded to a query from an
author who wanted to transition from self -
publishing to
traditional publishing.
This part of our
author blog features interviews with bestselling
authors who've been
published successfully with
traditional publishers like Random House or through self -
publishing.