Sentences with phrase «transfer fee amounts»

On a $ 5,000 transfer, the 5 % balance transfer fee amounts to $ 250 verses a balance transfer fee of 3 % which amounts to $ 150, which makes this card slightly more expensive if you decide to transfer a balance after the $ 0 introductory balance transfer fee period ends.

Transfer fee amounts are often a percentage of the total balance transferred.

Not exact matches

Each balance transfer transaction will be assessed a 4 % fee of the amount transferred ($ 10 minimum).

Some firms charge different fee amounts for a full transfer and a partial transfer.

The promotional APR on balance transfers isn't as generous as that for purchases, and keep in mind that Discover also charges a balance transfer fee equal to 3 % of the amount transferred.

With each transfer to the card, you will have to pay a fee of $ 5 or 3 % of the transfer amount, whichever is greater - this is a standard rate, and is found on most credit cards of this type.

Payouts via wire transfer are costly for small amounts, and other services» fees and country limitations make receiving small payouts impractical for some affiliates.

After the introductory periods end, a variable APR of 16.49 % -25.24 % applies on balance transfers and purchases, and there will be a fee of either $ 5 or 5 % of the amount of each transfer, whichever is greater.

For their services, Romit charges a flat 4 % fee on any amount of transferred funds.

Balance transfer fee: 3 % of the amount of each transfer, Annual Fee: Nofee: 3 % of the amount of each transfer, Annual Fee: NoFee: None.

The amount of the purchase is charged to your credit card as a purchase or moved from your bank account as an ACH or wire transfer, including any transaction fee.

After that, the fee for future transactions is 5 % of the amount transferred, with a minimum of $ 5.

Balance transfer fee: 3 % of the amount of each transfer.

After the first 60 days your account is open, the fee for future balance transfers is 5 % of the amount transferred, with a minimum of $ 5 †

After six transfers in a month, the fee goes up the nonsufficient funds fee amount of $ 12.

Balance transfer fee is 5 % of the amount transferred, $ 5 minimum and No Annual Fefee is 5 % of the amount transferred, $ 5 minimum and No Annual FeeFee †

Wire transfers can be done at reduced or no costs if they are over $ 500; smaller transaction amounts will be charged a fee of $ 25.

Balance transfer fee is 5 % of the amount transferred, $ 5 minimum.

The transaction fee is added to the total of your transaction amount, which is why you can only transfer slightly less than what you have in your Bitcoin wallet.

The bottom line is that your buyer must know the exact amount that will be sent to their lawyer on closing, to make sure they have enough to make up the rest of the down payment, land transfer tax and legal fees.

And after the first 60 days, the balance transfer fee is $ 5 or 5 % of the amount transferred, whichever is greater, so you'll need to make transfers early.

The total amount of your balance transfer requests, including fees and interest charges, can't exceed your available credit or $ 15,000, whichever is lower.

These fees are usually assessed based on a percentage of the amount that is transferred — usually around 3 %.

Cash Advance and Balance Transfer Fee: Either $ 10 or 4 % of the amount of each transaction, whichever is greater.

Balance transfer fee of either $ 10 or 5 % of the amount of each Balance Transfer, whichever is transfer fee of either $ 10 or 5 % of the amount of each Balance Transfer, whichever is Transfer, whichever is greater.

These days, such activity has been discouraged by card issuers, given the higher fees applied to balance transfers (typically 4 % of the transfer amount) and the low rates of return of alternative investments and savings accounts.

Balance transfer fee is 3 % of the amount transferred with a $ 5 minimum.

Balance transfer fees range from 3 % to 5 % of the transferred amount.

Even with the 3 % -5 % balance transfer fee it should be clear that you can save a good amount of money by taking advantage of a 0 % balance transfer credit card offers.

His transfer fee is double the amount paid in the previously highest of # 89m Manchester United paid for Paul Pogba last year.

Our summer transfer budget has been stated by the club as been in the region of # 75 million and when you consider that Arsenal fc have spent that amount on the combined fee's of Ozil and Sanchez, it's a bit harsh slating the powers that be at the club!

And that is only done, when a transfer is agreed to and hammering out the amount of transfer fee is a formality.

The amount of money he's going to spend for transfer fees and actual relocation expenses would have been more than enough to bridge the gap to build a new stadium where Qualcomm is now.

Of course Dortmund have every right to demand that crazy amount of money given the player's quality, as well as the way that transfer fees are thrown around in the current transfer market.

You don't get it do you?I'm not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez for all eyes will be on him.

The problem was thought to be the hefty transfer fee that we would have to pay but we know that Chelsea are happy to cough up huge amounts on players so why have they given up on Lukaku unless they know it is a pointless chase?

The amount of money involved, both the for the transfer fee and for Pjanic's potential wages, would be massive, and it's hard to see Arsenal stumping up.

According to The Mirror, the club are set to invest a huge amount of money in Walker, as not only are they set to make him the most expensive defender in history with a # 54m transfer fee, but he'll secure a five - year deal worth close to # 200,000 - per - week with bonuses included, meaning that the entire amount spent on the 27 - year - old could reach # 100m.

Now I am sure we would all love to see Messi at Arsenal, but as he is now 28 I can imagine Arsene Wenger having a heart attack if someone told him that he would have to pay a player that amount of money, and that's not even thinking about if an astronomical transfer fee would be involved!

He never complains about growth or amount of his paycheck, however player wages and transfer fees are ridiculous.

Because transfer fees being so high, even for normal players, nobody will want to pay the amount of money demanded, more and more players will go to the end of their contracts.

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

Perez, speaking to the Intereconomia television channel, has revealed that the club have insured Bale for the full amount of his transfer fee, which he confirmed was $ 91 million (# 78 million).

After all the talk of smashing the world transfer, it appears that Real Madrid have managed to bring the transfer fee for Gareth Bale down to a slightly more sensible amount of 84 million euros, with the possibility of it rising to 91 million if certain conditions are met, probably to do with goals, appearances and success.

A # 34 million loss for the last recorded accounting period (2012 - 3), including staff costs of # 26.1 million is far from small beer and if the television deal Leicester will enjoy from August makes those amounts look piddling at face value, the wages and transfer fees required to compete at the top level will almost certainly be sufficient to keep the club in the red for some time to come.

He played under Mourinho at the Bernabeu during the manager's three - year spell and although signed a new deal last year, that contract is up in 2017 and he wouldn't cost United the kind of astronomical amounts in transfer fees Bonucci would command.

Also interesting is the amount of money spent on transfer fees over that did not come from the revenue generated by player sales.

Although it would probably be a «minimal» amount (in Premier League transfer fee terms), and probably not more than a couple of hundred thousand pounds.

Everton would still ask for a fee around the # 25m mark in the summer, an amount Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is unlikely to be unwilling to spend in order to secure a transfer for the player.

The court is looking into a complaint made by a Brazilian investment group which claims it was financially harmed when Barcelona and Neymar allegedly withheld the real amount of the player's transfer fee from Brazilian club Santos in 2013.