Sentences with phrase «trial board procedure»

Not exact matches

Whether the committee statement, if adopted, will ever be used as a basis for such serious procedures as heresy trials can not now be predicted, but that it will be used by Boards of Ordained Ministry in screening candidates can be confidently stated.

The white paper recommends that practitioners follow relevant guidance documents and that deviation from consensus recommendations should be supported by clinical studies or pursued in the setting of a clinical trial approved by an institutional review board; that practitioners receive training in a new procedure before beginning its practice, that the training should include a practical, «hands - on» component and that all team members directly involved with the radiation therapy decisions should participate in at least five proctored cases before performing similar procedures independently; and that professional societies should accelerate the generation of new or updated guidance documents for the following disease sites and techniques: skin, central nervous system, gastrointestinal, lung or endobronchial and esophagus, and, while outside the charge of this panel, assess the need for updated guidance documents for accelerated partial breast irradiation using electronic brachytherapy.

Inter partes review (IPR) is a procedure within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) which authorizes a board (namely, the Patent Trial and Appeals board) to reconsider and cancel an already - issued patent claim.

On August 12, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted rehearing en banc to appellants in In re Aqua Products, Inc to consider the procedures used by the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to limit the ability of patent owners to amend claims during AIA post-grant proceedings.

On August 12, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted rehearing en banc to appellants in In re Aqua Products, Inc to consider the procedures used by the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to limit the ability of patent owners to amend claims during...

On October 4, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision rejecting certain procedures adopted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) limiting a patent owner's ability to amend claims during Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings under the America Invents Act.

On April 1, 2016, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published final rules modifying some procedures used in AIA trials before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

Tags: 35 U.S.C. § 103, 35 USC 102, CBM, Christy, class action, compensation, Court of Federal Claims, covered business method review, due process, Fifth Amendment, inter partes review, IPR Proceedings, lawsuit, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, PGR, post grant procedures, post grant proceedings, post grant review, PTAB Trials, Takings Clause, vacuum cleaner

Beyond the AIA anti-joinder rules, there are at least two other changes to the landscape in recent years: the availability of the review procedures at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the USPTO, and the Supreme Court's decision of the Alice v. CLS Bank case in June of 2014.

Beyond the AIA anti-joinder rules, there are at least two other changes to the landscape in recent years: the availability of the review procedures at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the USPTO, and the Supreme Court's decision of the Alice -LSB-...]