Sentences with phrase «trial court granted»

The trial court granted the Broker's motion for supplementary relief and also extended the Notice for another year.

The sellers and their broker moved for summary judgment on the buyer's claims against them, and the trial court granted their motion.

The trial court granted specific performance, and the Sellers appealed.

The trial court granted the injunction request, and Sowers appealed this ruling.

CBRE filed a motion seeking judgment in its favor, and the trial court granted the motion.

The trial court granted summary judgment for the broker, finding that the broker had no notice of any defect on the diving board.

The trial court granted judgment in favor of Century 21, and Gordon appealed.

The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants.

Instead of allowing a jury decision, at the close of the evidence, the trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of the appraiser defendants, finding that the appraised value was an opinion that could not be an actionable misrepresentation.

The trial court granted summary judgment for the sellers and sellers» representative, and the judgment was affirmed on appeal.

The trial court granted the motion based on this authority.

In January 2015, the trial court granted P&G's motion to exclude all of the plaintiffs» general causation experts, a decision that led to the dismissal with prejudice of 62 plaintiffs in April 2015; in June 2016, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed.

The trial court granted judgment in favor of Smith and Hirt, finding that the intentional spoliation claim «failed because she was unable to establish that either Smith or Hirt had physically destroyed evidence.»

The hospital ultimately moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted, finding that: (1) the technologist did not act within the scope of her duties, as is necessary for the hospital to be vicariously liable for the technologist's conduct; (2) the plaintiffs failed to adduce sufficient evidence to support a finding of intentional infliction of emotional distress; and (3) none of the plaintiffs suffered actual damages as a result of the technologist's conduct.

The trial court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment on her failure to warn claim, and a jury entered a verdict in Merck's favor in October 2011 on the design defect claim.

The defendant revealed in an amended pleading that it is a political subdivision of the state of Indiana, and the trial court granted summary judgment based on the plaintiffs» lack of notice under the ITCA.

After discovery, the trial court granted summary judgment against the contractor on the grounds that the contractor could not present evidence to prove this essential fact.

The trial court granted a «status only» judgment dissolving the marriage pending resolution of financial matters, imposing numerous conditions to

The trial court granted the defendants» motion to dismiss the fraud and conspiracy claims and the plaintiff appealed.

The trial court granted the defense attorney's motion to suppress all evidence obtained subsequent to the traffic stop, arguing that there was no particularized basis to stop him.

In this DUI trial the court granted the defendant's motion for a new trial because it became clear that part of the trial was conducted when the courthouse was already closed and locked for the night.

The trial court granted mother's petition to restore J.C. to her custody for a return to Korea.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the individual defendants and judgment on the pleadings for the City as to the sexual harassment claims.

The dual effort bore fruit: the trial court granted summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds and awarded attorney's fees for the costs of proving denied requests for admission, and the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's rulings in full.

The trial court granted the motion and awarded Flagstar more than $ 600,000 to reimburse the cost of defending the lawsuit to that point, and the Federal Circuit has now upheld that award.

The trial court granted the tavern's motion, effectively killing the negligent hiring and retention claim.

The trial court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgement, and the plaintiff appealed.

The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant.

The trial court granted Smith's motion, and the plaintiff appealed.

Trial court granted this motion and then ordered insurer to pay the remaining balance.

The trial court granted defendants dismissal, finding the plaintiff failed to submit evidence necessary to prove that she could have achieved a better result.

The trial court granted a «summary judgment» against the mother on her claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress but, sustained the claim of the sibling.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the company, and the court of appeals then reversed the decision.

In 2009, the defendants moved to dismiss the informed - consent claim and the trial court granted that motion.

Representation of Citibank in Citibank NA v. Silverman, in which the trial court granted a $ 57.2 million judgment in favor of Citibank for breach of loan agreements, and the First Department affirmed judgment

The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants.

When the state sought summary judgment on sovereign immunity grounds, the trial court granted it, but the appellate court reversed.

Instead, the trial court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the case, holding that Schaefer failed to show that he would have been successful at trial had the evidence been preserved and admitted into evidence.

Representation of Citibank in Citibank NA v. Solow, in which the trial court granted a $ 100.8 million judgment in favor of Citibank for breach of loan agreements, and the First Department affirmed judgment

The trial court granted the motion to stay and compel arbitration, and Bernard appealed, contending that, as a wrongful death beneficiary, he could not be bound to Lola's arbitration agreement.

The trial court granted the motion, and the Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that neither the discovery rule nor Trial Rule 15 (C) rendered Bradshaw's amended complaint timely.

Ultimately, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Bank because there was no evidence that Diaz ever provided medical clearance from a doctor that would allow her to return to work.

In this slip and fall action, the trial court granted Appellee Wal - Mart's motion for summary judgment based on the nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact that Wal - Mart had actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition.In this slip and fall action, the trial court granted Appellee Wal - Mart's motion for summary judgment based on the nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact that Wal - Mart had actual or constructive notice of a dangerous condition.

Thus, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

The trial court granted the motion and Rambo appealed to the court of appeals.

Prior to trial, the trial court granted the automotive manufacturer's partial summary judgment, holding that a manufacturer does not have a duty to warn about products manufactured by other companies.

The trial court granted the University's request for summary judgment and dismissed the professor's claims.

The trial court granted the motion and the Pielhaus voluntarily dismissed their remaining claims.

Even though the tree trial courts granted him bail, however, the defendant was on December 29, 2015, re-arrested by operatives of the Department of State Services, DSS, after his release from Kuje prison upon perfecting the bail conditions.

On appeal, the plaintiffs argued that it was an error for the court to dismiss their defect and negligence claims because the only grounds to grant the motion for summary judgment relied on the trial court granting the defendant's request to exclude the expert's testimony.