Trial testimony showed that the seller had removed old plasterboard and put up wood paneling over the basement walls four days before putting the house on the market in September 1993.
Not exact matches
According to sources, Cigna believes the bench
trial in November produced
testimony that
shows Anthem didn't hold up its end of the merger agreement.
State Sen. John DeFrancisco, a GOP candidate for governor, said
testimony and evidence in the
trial showed that when Percoco was off the state payroll for most of 2014, and managing Cuomo's re-election campaign, he continued to use his state offices and privileges, making 837 phone calls and meeting with other Cuomo aides.
And the head of the state's Republican Party, Ed Cox, has said that
testimony in the
trial, including Percoco's use of the state offices while he was not an employee,
shows that Cuomo fostered a «culture of corruption and disrespect for the law».
The wife of former top Cuomo aide Joseph Percoco was paid more than $ 22,500 for less than half a week's worth of work at an alleged «low -
show» job, according to
testimony at her husband's corruption
trial Wednesday.
The head of the state's Republican Party, Ed Cox, has said that
testimony in the
trial, including Percoco's use of the state offices while he was not an employee,
shows that Cuomo fostered a «culture of corruption and disrespect for the law.»
Testimony in Percoco's federal corruption
trial showed he used his old New York City office, which was right next to Cuomo's, numerous times.
Testimony at
trial showed that Percoco spoke with Cuomo while his Westchester County house was raided by federal agents.
State Senator and GOP candidate for Governor John DeFrancisco says
testimony and evidence in the
trial showed that when Percoco was off the state payroll for most of 2014, and managing Cuomo's re election campaign, continued to use his state offices and privileges, making 837 phone calls and meeting with other Cuomo aides.
When The Post raised the issue earlier this week, Shafran insisted «the governor's decisions are not influenced by contributions, as
testimony in the
trials showed.»
If the answer or information is being read into evidence to
show that a witness's
testimony at
trial is not to be believed, answers or information given by the witness earlier must be put to the witness as sections 20 and 21 of the Evidence Act require.
«Disagreeing with the
trial court's grant of summary judgment, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has held that 3 incidents over two years, combined with other
testimony showing continuing problems in the workplace, is enough to require a jury [to] sort out whether a restaurant should be held liable for sexual harassment...»
Since the plaintiff did not provide notice that the physician who prepared the expert affidavit intended to provide expert
testimony at
trial, the affidavit was insufficient to
show a genuine issue of material fact as to the defendant's lack of requisite skill at
trial.
At the Order of Protection
trial, Gus cross-examined the accuser and the accuser's witnesses,
showing the judge that the accuser's
testimony was not credible.
In an unusual turn of events at the Texas
trial now under appeal, the state was caught red - handed: Four of the state's five expert witnesses were forced to change their
testimony on the stand when confronted with emails
showing they had lied about who had written their reports.
The
trial is just like you see on TV
shows, with an opening statement,
testimony from witnesses and a closing statement.