Sentences with phrase «true value method»

The NetWorth RealtyTM True Value Method is a streamlined process for finding a property, securing funding, unlocking its value through renovations, and selling or leasing that home as soon as the upgrades are complete.

Not exact matches

EU countries have been looking into methods to tax digital companies, including Amazon.com Inc. and Facebook Inc., in a way that captures the true value created in the region.

To get true value from buyer insights research and buyer personas, you need to use the right qualitative techniques and methods.

These business valuation methods are predicated on the idea that a business's true value lies in its ability to produce wealth in the future.

Until we know more about the validity of in vitro methods, it is not recommended that they be used in clinical or epidemiologic research applications or for food labeling purposes because of the potential for large over - or underestimates of true GI values.

This is part of the reason why we believe that the Singapore Math Method our online math tutors use is so helpful, because traditional teaching methods tend to value repetition, instead of focusing on true mastery.

The True Market Value ® (TMV ®) price is our exclusive method for calculating what others are paying for a 2018 Chevrolet Express Cargo 2500 in null, null (based on actual sales data from your region).

True interest cost: In a competitive bid municipal bond offering, a method of calculating the interest cost that takes into account the time value of money.

As with most valuation methods, this formula is not designed to give a true value of a stock.

The most annoying part of his valuation method is that he calls the value that gets calculated for the stock not the «true value» or «fair value» but «sticker price.»

You may not have Warren Buffett's money, but his value - oriented strategy is one of the best tried and true methods of consistently staying ahead on investments.

But your statement: «Given that, it's easy to see why a subjective Bayesian method will usually NOT produce perfect probability matching when averaging over a distribution for true parameter values that is different from the prior it uses» reveals a major problem.

Miker613, Jeffreys» prior means that the outcome of the analysis is influenced strongly by the method we use in the measurements in addition to to the true value that we are trying to find out.

So if we condition, it must be on where the data tells us we are (using our method, whatever it is), and not on the true parameter values.

It's true that the above approach does not describe well the case where the method used can not differentiate effectively values over a wide range, or where the empirical result is best compatible with two or more separate ranges of the value that we wish to determine.general

Ice thickness is more difficult, and I would assign greater error bars, but the increase is quite remarkable, and, as Willis recently pointed out, while the exact m = thickness may be disputable, the method used is consistent, therefore the change documented is true relative to the past, even if the exact value is not known.

NCDC uses a common anomaly method, not RFM.The reason why station values in the distant past end up getting adjusted is due to a choice by NCDC to assume that current values are the «true» values.

But in all of this I think an unbiased look at all the methods for ESTIMATING ECS reveals that there is room for honest debate about the true value, whether it is 1.6 or 4.5 IS AN HONEST DEBATE, its not denialist bull crap.