Sentences with phrase «try speaking to him about it»

Try speaking to him about it and get him to see your side.

Not exact matches

Sources told The Times that Facebook's communications team wanted Zuckerberg, who rarely speaks about Facebook's operations in such a public forum, to avoid being defensive and try to answer questions as directly as possible.
I remember seeing a highlight of his appearance on «The Oprah Winfrey Show» back in 1997 and he spoke about his early days trying to make it in the entertainment business.
The president also has cast aside the constraints the retired four - star Marine general tried to place on Trump about whom he could see and speak to.
He talks about accountability and support structures, about how we need to speak to people, our friends or co-workers, and let them know about the changes we're trying to make.
Some people are stubborn or hesitant to speak up about going home and will try to work through sickness when they're actually at their most contagious.»
Whenever we are in meetings, nobody has to be nervous to speak about how they think we should approach a task, because we are all trying to achieve a common goal and everyone is very supportive of that.»
Even though the bots are voice - equipped and «speak» several languages, only about a quarter of people try talking to them.
Mr. Trump also spoke at length about the standoff with armed protesters who last Saturday seized the headquarters at a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon, suggesting that he would have called the leader of the group to try to make a deal to end it — and would have acted against them if negotiations failed because «you can not let people take over federal property.»
As Kashuv's media profile grows, Shapiro told me, «I do worry about Kyle and his exposure to the media,» adding that he speaks to Kyle regularly to «try to caution him against mistakes I made when I was his age.»
In the call later Monday, Quarta spoke about the company's search for a new CEO and said the company is trying to conclude the process as quickly as possible, but that «it must be done both thoroughly and properly.»
I'm trying to imagine how you spoke with your wife, a marriage counsellor, about this conviction...
Both politicians ran into trouble because they didn't really know very much about the people they were trying to explain, having much more in common with the ones they were speaking to.
The veses prior to God speaking up, is where Job and his friends trying to console him, are saying things they mis - understood about what God did, based on the understanding of the day, then.
Part of you is still reeling from the revelation and trying to reconcile the fact that a man who you respect (ed), who taught about things like integrity and honesty, was apparently more able to speak those truths than live them out.
So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.
What is wrong with people, why are you trying to act all high and mighty as if these people that were polled were evil racist people because they spoke the truth about how they feel about a candidate.
I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing to answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone to deepening my belief, who accept everyone as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need to try to be hip, who speak about things without inserting politics, who are wiling to trash the temple to bring us back to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be real.
I was trying to acknowledge someone's complaint about the strong language while at the same time explaining that it is only another way to speak that might require a small effort to translate.
I'm not trying to insult you, Craig, but you speak in a very authoritarian way for someone who has so many misunderstandings about the Bible.
Regarding the events of the last few weeks... this is about as balanced of a summary you are going to find when you are faced with a disagreement and one side refuses to speak and instead tries to actively repress the speech of the other.
Lately I've been getting invitations to speak to youth about the virtues, so I've been trying to recall my own early training on the subject.
You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.
Again just a cursory reading above shows you are trying to speak for others, making claims about absolutes that were not made.
If the Christian right seeks to gain earthly political power (something Christ himself rejected when tempted by Satan), why don't they at least try to find candidates who support the very issues Christ actually spoke about & challenged us to address as his followers?
I have tried to read books and internet to get some clarification of the bible, I think well this person would be good to learn from because they are so knowledgeable about the Bible and then they speak about faith and works and I get so confused all over again.
So Luke, drawing on this Old Testament material, tries to heighten the Elijah story to stretch his language sufficiently to speak about Jesus.
Don't try to force people to think how you think, however speak your feelings with good intentions, and let others decide for themselves how THEY feel about it.
only reason y i say this is because of Santification, once we give our life to the Lord, we streight way (so to speak) begin the process of Santification, this is Christ making us like him, and this Is SUFFERING It does nt happen over night, but for the duration of our time here, as you have said, its sort of like sin being done unto us, and we are handleing it just like Christ did, (with Love) of coarse with the help of the Holy Spirit, This Does NOT feel Good At ALL since our soulful flesh is Corrupt, (but our spirit is saved) This is were your trails and tribulation, your own desire, and All play apart, Now Moment by Moment we choose by our own will, And Jesus helps in these times, as he was tempeted, but without sin, The devil can do nothing but try and decieve the Christian into thinking that he has to work for his salvation as you have said, this thing here is about your Inheritance In Christ, Its gonna be some show nought broke christian in Heaven, because their trying to set of for themseleve trasure on earth, and their is going to be weeping and gnat of teeth, but it wont be, because of their going to Hell, It will be cause they miss out on what they could have had, and it is Devistation, cause they waste so much time, and they wont be able to attend the wedding, supper of the lamb, they wont be, getting the position over city, galacy, ectt... just check it out some of the points i have made, God Bless you!
In the same way that the Black Lives Matter movement simply seeks to highlight that black lives do, in fact, matter (in a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous points).
@ Bubble - brain — Well (and I'll try to speak slowly) what do we know about Santa?
Speaking about his intentions while in the Holy Land, Welby said: «I think the aim is to try and be as positive as possible.
I've realized that people are more moved when I speak from my heart, from a place of unshakable faith about an unfailing personal Savior than when I try to rely on solely my intellect or how well I can communicate my ideas.
They even tell us we cant even speak what we feel trying to make all feel bad about our convictions.
Eating the flesh and drinking the blood have overtones of the Lord's Supper, and many scholars have tried to point out in these words the influence of the mystery religions, which often spoke about eating the body of the dying and rising savior god.
Of «unconscious wishes,» naturally, one can speak with less assurance, but at least I am not wholly unacquainted with the better - known theories about these also, and have tried to take them into account.
The Reformers spoke in biblicist terms when trying to rid Christendom of what they identified as Catholic errors, but biblicism became a less functional standard once Protestants began to disagree among themselves about the meaning of the Bible.
When the pastor speaks of faith in eternal life, he will try to show that this faith is a declaration about present reality, not only a promise of something beyond death.
In Metz's words, political theology «tries to carry out the same task that Christian theology has always carried out — that of speaking about God by making the connection between the Christian message and the modern world».
When the bible speaks about being in Christ and the Holy Spirit dwelling in us we start to try to figure out how to do this.....
---- the egyptian mystery systems — maybe they are not as mysterious as you think, maybe worth another look, — this time without preconceived notions — like that they are pagan, like that they are about gods and goddesses — try to find and establish the «Eye», which the glyphs speak of ---- Comparison is the key, to the door which is Life --
About the only major force trying to uncover truth and speak it in power is the loose networks of NGOs13 that operate locally, regionally, and, by increasing measure, globally.
Speaking about human freedom, he is trying to cope with the Kantian dilemma of freedom and necessity within the framework of the categories of his organic logic.
«Christianity is not being attack the devil is a liar / people today will sue by association, irs is coming after me in 2011 after i left my business partner in 2008 he did nt pay them or others creditors they do nt care if you do nt owe it they want the money i own another company, a person give me a bad check for 100.00 he got a attoney in n / c trying to sue me for 4000.00 there was no voilation, but everyone i spoke to said it would be cheaper to offer and settlement / he owed the debt he bouced the check, why should i pay, so its about the mighty green but all liars will have their part in the lake of fire, he without sin cast the frist stone
We are now in position to see more clearly how Paul understood the necessity of the incarnation, (This term can scarcely be avoided, but will be understood, when applied to Paul, in the light of what I tried to say earlier), about which we were speaking in the preceding lecture.
Jesus spoke to Peter about feeding his sheep, and to his apostles about people who lacked the eyes to see and the ears to hear and how they will never understand his parables even if they try (and, interestingly, he said this as the reason he taught using parables rather than just stating things out explicitly).
@TJP — So once again, why aren't you giving any credence to what Christ actually spoke about and trying to ban remarriage?
And here, in speaking specifically about the helmet of salvation, Paul tells us that one of the main truths that Satan tries to attack is what we know about our salvation — specifically — whether we have salvation or not.
On this level, I speak about hermeneutics trying to understand the specific perspective underlying the above - mentioned propositions.
Or once again, in Leonard Hodgson's way of phrasing it, we are trying to find what the state of things really is, how things really go, in a fashion which makes sense to us, when we grant that men and women who lived at that time, under those conditions, with those presuppositions, spoke about the matter in that way.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z