Accuracy of Model Predictions and the Effects of Atmospheric Stability on Wind
Turbine Noise at the Maple Ridge Wind Power Facility, Lowville, NY Schneider, Clifford
Not exact matches
On a blustery, overcast day last week, the blades of the 156 - foot wind
turbine just west of the grapevines
at Pindar Vineyards cut through the air with a quiet whooshing
noise.
«
At a time when issues of
noise are one of the main barriers to the building of wind
turbines, for example, a method for reducing the
noise they generate is most welcome.»
Another optional extra available for both models is an acoustic pedestrian warning, which makes it easier for pedestrians to notice the vehicle when driving
at low speeds in all - electric mode by generating a distinctive identifying sound similar to the
noise from a
turbine.
That didn't happen here, although one proposed farm was abandoned because the vibration from the wind
turbines would have increased the «seismic
noise»
at the Laser Interferometry Gravitational Observatory», half of which is located on the Hanford Site, looking for gravitational waves.
I accept that
noise at a level that could cause physical harm would constitute «pollution» but given that wind
turbine noise is more of a small background hum
at distance of about 400m, that falls far short of a reasonable threshhold for measurable harm.
Lyme, N.Y., Wind Energy Conversion Systems Law [7.5 - MB PDF]-- 1 / 2 - mile setback from property lines, 1 - mile setback from schools, churches, public gathering places; 30 / 35 - dBA +18 - dBC
noise limit
at property line Union, Wisc., Large Wind
Turbine Citizens Committee Setback Recommendations Report [24 - MB PDF]
This industry has been well aware of the problems directly caused by wind
turbine noise since 1987, when Dr Neil Kelley's research [12] establishing direct causation of annoyance symptoms from infrasound and low frequency
noise was presented
at the American Wind Energy Association conference.
Mr Barnard also fails to mention the opinions of rural family physicians such as Dr Sandy Reider, from Vermont, who is
at the front line of clinical care for those affected by wind
turbine noise, that «wind
turbine syndrome» is a euphemistic description which does not sufficiently depict the clinical severity of the clinical cases he is seeing [10].
Professor Hansen's team's research findings have now supported Dr Laurie's statement in 2011 about the distance of impact and are consistent with the residents» consistent reports for nearly four years of a low frequency
noise problem from the wind
turbines at Waterloo, which severely disrupts their sleep.
«Picton, Ontario, November 16, 2010 — High levels of low frequency
noise (LFN) are produced and can be measured
at wind
turbine developments according to Richard James INCE, acoustics specialist from Michigan.
As for the tranquillity that the EMLRLG talk about, wind
turbines do not make much
noise and can not often be heard
at all
at distances greater than a kilometre or two.
Turbine towers could not be taller than 500 feet from base to blade tip, and they could not emit
noise greater than 45 decibels
at the property line.
The level of background
noise at distances of a kilometre or more from wind
turbines makes measuring the effect of sound from wind
turbines on people
at such distances complicated.
The consequences of exposure to impulsive infrasound and low frequency
noise generated by wind
turbines were also clearly well known to the global wind industry, because of the dramatic change in design which resulted, and because the results were presented
at the AWEA sponsored conference.
He went on to say «It found many people living near wind
turbines at a wind farm near Cape Bridgewater in Victoria are suffering health complaints caused by low - frequency
noise generated by wind
turbines».
For a taste of their highly relevant qualifications and experience why not check out their thumping CVs here: Schomer and Hessler; and both of them were involved in another proper piece of investigation into the adverse impacts of
turbine generated low - frequency
noise and infrasound on neighbours
at Shirley, Wisconsin back in 2012 (see the report here and our post here).
However,
at the moment, uncertainty about how factors such as low wind speeds, high levels of turbulence,
noise, visual impact, and animal strikes influence the performance of micro wind
turbines make it hard to determine their true potential in this form.
At that meeting, WAWC learned that the
noise assessment data for the as yet untested Enercon
turbines was not complete, and there was no timetable for when it would be available.
On January 9, 2009, the New York Supreme Court annulled a town law regulating large wind
turbines because the town board did not take a «hard look»
at relevant areas of environmental concern, and it disregarded study committee recommendations for setbacks and
noise standards to protect the health and well - being of residents.
In several records, staff noted that wind
turbine noise exceeded regulations: ««Staff have attended
at the complainants homes on multiple occasions...
noise measurements were obtained... subjective observations were made by Provincial Officers... the conclusion of the POs were that the
noise emissions from the wind
turbines were causing an adverse effect contrary to S. 14 (1) of the EPA
at the complainants locations...»
In Australia, where the controversy is reaching new heights, a wind industry executive has been singling out Dr Sarah Laurie in a bid to make the public forget the many other health professionals who alert the public to the dangerous effects of wind
turbines: «[T] he largest public relations issue for the industry
at the moment is the theory of an ex-doctor that infrasound or low frequency
noise from wind
turbines is likely to make anyone within 10 km of a wind
turbine sick» (2).
«Whilst the aerodynamic
noise from a rotating
turbine blade produces energy in the infrasound range, measurements of infrasound
noise emissions from modern upwind
turbines indicates that
at distances of 200 metres, infrasound is in the order of 25 dB below the recognised perception threshold of 85 dB (G) and other similar recognised perception thresholds (Hayes Mckenzie Partnership Ltd, 2006).
There is some evidence to suggest that audible
noise from wind
turbines at elevated sound pressure levels may be associated with disturbed sleep and negative emotions.
Kamperman, George; and James, Richard Simple guidelines for siting wind
turbines to prevent health risks ~ Also see «How - to guide to criteria for siting wind
turbines to prevent health risks from sound» by the same authors Paper presented
at Institute of
Noise Control Engineering (INCE) NOISE - CON 2008, July 28 - 31, 2008 George W. Kamperman, INC
Noise Control Engineering (INCE)
NOISE - CON 2008, July 28 - 31, 2008 George W. Kamperman, INC
NOISE - CON 2008, July 28 - 31, 2008 George W. Kamperman, INCE Bd.
I hear
noise in the house day and night since the wind
turbines were switched on
at Alltwalis Wind Farm.
There is no evidence that health or health - related effects from wind
turbine noise would be any different to those from other
noise sources
at similar levels.
The Victorian Department of Health (DH)(WorkSafe, 2010) has examined both the peer - reviewed and validated scientific research and concluded that «the weight of evidence indicated that there are no direct health effects from
noise (audible and inaudible)
at the levels generated by modern wind
turbines.»
On both nights I slept
at Waterloo Wind Farm I visited Waterloo and listened for
turbine noise both in the evening and again in the morning.
«75... the Tribunals did not have before them expert evidence which seriously called into question the principle underpinning the EPA's renewable energy project regulatory regime — i.e. that wind
turbines which are set back 550m from a dwelling house and which do not generate
noise levels in excess of 40 dBA
at the lowest specified wind speed do not cause serious harm to human health based upon the current state of scientific knowledge.»