Sentences with phrase «u.s. federal court hearing»

via Hot Off the Presses: Highlights & Official Transcript of U.S. Federal Court Hearing on Whether ICOs Are Subject to SEC Jurisdiction LinkedIn.

Not exact matches

Tsarnaev's death sentence, once confirmed at the hearing, would make him one of just 59 prisoners condemned to execution in U.S. federal courts, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

A three - judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is scheduled to hear arguments Monday from lawyers for Bayou Bridge Pipeline LLC, federal regulators and...

At a hearing in San Francisco federal court, U.S. District Judge William Alsup said he was skeptical Waymo could ultimately prove that Uber's self - driving car program used Waymo trade secrets.

A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments over President Donald Trump's temporary travel ban on people entering the U.S. from six Muslim - majority countries.

The two sides were set to face off in court on Tuesday, but late on Monday a federal judge in Riverside, California, agreed to the government's request to postpone the hearing after U.S. prosecutors said that a «third party» had presented a possible method for opening an encrypted iPhone.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Google's appeal of a lower court's ruling that narrowed the scope of patents that can be challenged before a federal tribunal whose proceedings have led to the cancellation of many patCourt on Monday declined to hear Google's appeal of a lower court's ruling that narrowed the scope of patents that can be challenged before a federal tribunal whose proceedings have led to the cancellation of many patcourt's ruling that narrowed the scope of patents that can be challenged before a federal tribunal whose proceedings have led to the cancellation of many patents.

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court is hearing Christie et al vs NCAA et al, the crux of which is whether the state of New Jersey can legalize sports betting in its state, despite a 1992 federal law that banned sports betting everywhere in the U.S. except Nevada.

The week before, after three days of hearings in a U.S. District Court in Indianapolis, Federal Judge James Noland reversed a USAC ban that would have kept six CART teams — numbering among them drivers such as defending Indy champ Al Unser, his brother Bobby, and former winners Johnny Rutherford and Gordon Johncock — from competing in this year's race.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Nassau County's appeal of a federal court ruling upholding a $ 43 million judgment won by two men who — after spending years in prison — were exonerated in the 1984 rape and murder of a Lynbrook teenCourt declined to hear Nassau County's appeal of a federal court ruling upholding a $ 43 million judgment won by two men who — after spending years in prison — were exonerated in the 1984 rape and murder of a Lynbrook teencourt ruling upholding a $ 43 million judgment won by two men who — after spending years in prison — were exonerated in the 1984 rape and murder of a Lynbrook teenager.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to hear former Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver's bid to block his retrial on corruption charges, paving the way for a planned April 16 start to Silver's new trial in Manhattan federal cCourt on Tuesday refused to hear former Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver's bid to block his retrial on corruption charges, paving the way for a planned April 16 start to Silver's new trial in Manhattan federal courtcourt.

Singh was ordered jailed until at least a hearing Thursday by U.S. Magistrate Arlene Lindsay at the federal court house in Central Islip.

Also at 9:30 a.m., advocates from the Taxis for All Campaign hold a rally to coincide with a federal court hearing concerning the city's proposed «Taxi for Tomorrow,» and demonstrators in wheelchairs will attempt to hail taxis following the hearing; courtroom 11A and Worth Street entrance of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl St., Manhattan.

In the chaotic hours after Trump signed the sloppily written executive order meant to fulfill his Muslim ban campaign promise, Stephen Miller called the home of Robert Capers to dictate to the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District how he should defend that order at a Saturday emergency federal court hearing.

The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear former Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver's bid to block his retrial on corruption charges, paving the way for a planned April 16 start to the Manhattan Democrat's new trial in federal cCourt refused to hear former Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver's bid to block his retrial on corruption charges, paving the way for a planned April 16 start to the Manhattan Democrat's new trial in federal courtcourt.

BUFFALO - The two men accused of killing Mary Whitaker last month in her Westfield summer home have pleaded not guilty to all federal charges during a hearing Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Buffalo.

One big challenge to U.S. efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions comes this week, as a federal circuit court hears arguments over a challenge to the White House's major climate change initiative, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) regulations targeting emissions from power plants.

Following a federal court hearing, the U.S. Navy has agreed to limit its use of sonar in specified areas around the Hawaiian Islands and southern California.

Senator Tom Harkin (D — IA) called the hearing of the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on labor, health and human services, and education in the wake of the 23 August ruling by Chief Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., that hESC research violates a law barring federal funds for research that harms human embryos.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined last week to review a federal appeals court's ruling that a Texas teacher who resigned under pressure should have been granted an administrative hearing before his resignation took efCourt declined last week to review a federal appeals court's ruling that a Texas teacher who resigned under pressure should have been granted an administrative hearing before his resignation took efcourt's ruling that a Texas teacher who resigned under pressure should have been granted an administrative hearing before his resignation took effect.

With Senate hearings on U.S. Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts Jr. scheduled to begin Sept. 6, several education groups said last week that they were content to wait on opining about whether the federal appellate judge should become the high court's next associate jusCourt nominee John G. Roberts Jr. scheduled to begin Sept. 6, several education groups said last week that they were content to wait on opining about whether the federal appellate judge should become the high court's next associate juscourt's next associate justice.

Racial desegregation: The U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments on whether the DeKalb County, Ga., schools should be freed from federal - court oversCourt hears oral arguments on whether the DeKalb County, Ga., schools should be freed from federal - court overscourt oversight.

It is in this context that a federal appeals court (and possibly the U.S. Supreme Court) will hear Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, which takes on compulsory teacher - union dues direcourt (and possibly the U.S. Supreme Court) will hear Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, which takes on compulsory teacher - union dues direCourt) will hear Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, which takes on compulsory teacher - union dues directly.

February 24, 2017 — Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court have or will soon hear cases involving the appropriate scope of services guaranteed by federal special - education law, government aid to religious institutions providing educational services, and restroom access for transgender students.

A New Hampshire couple who alleged that the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act violated their rights to religious freedom lost their bid last week for a hearing in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Several Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court asked last week whether federal - court supervision of the Kansas City, Mo., school district has gone too far as the Court heard oral arguments in a major school - desegregation Court asked last week whether federal - court supervision of the Kansas City, Mo., school district has gone too far as the Court heard oral arguments in a major school - desegregation court supervision of the Kansas City, Mo., school district has gone too far as the Court heard oral arguments in a major school - desegregation Court heard oral arguments in a major school - desegregation case.

The denial of a review is especially concerning given the existing split among federal circuit courts of appeal, one reason NSBA and school district lawyers met late last year with the U.S. Solicitor General, urging the administration to encourage the Supreme Court to hear the case even if it disagreed on the merits.

1912: NEA endorses Women's Suffrage 1919: NEA members in New Jersey lead the way to the nation's first state pension; by 1945, every state had a pension plan in effect 1941: NEA successfully lobbied Congress for special funding for public schools near military bases 1945: NEA lobbied for the G.I. Bill of Rights to help returning soldiers continue their education 1958: NEA helps gain passage of the National Defense Education Act 1964: NEA lobbies to pass the Civil Rights Act 1968: NEA leads an effort to establish the Bilingual Education Act 1974: NEA backs a case heard before the U.S. Supreme Court that proposes to make unlawful the firing of pregnant teachers or forced maternity leave 1984: NEA fights for and wins passage of a federal retirement equity law that provides the means to end sex discrimination against women in retirement funds 2000s: NEA has lobbied for changes to the No Child Left Behind Act 2009: NEA delegates to the Representative Assembly pass a resolution that opposes the discriminatory treatment of same - sex couple

The U.S. Federal Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is scheduled to hear oral arguments Wednesday on a lawsuit challenging Wake County's school board election maps.

A federal judge in San Francisco has ordered parties in a landmark global warming lawsuit to hold what could be the first - ever U.S. court hearing on the science of climate change....

The U.S. Supreme Court decided on Monday that it will hear the case over Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Order 745.

On Tuesday, a U.S. District Court judge in San Francisco, William Alsup, ruled that the Oakland and San Francisco lawsuits must be heard in federal court, a potential setback for the plaintCourt judge in San Francisco, William Alsup, ruled that the Oakland and San Francisco lawsuits must be heard in federal court, a potential setback for the plaintcourt, a potential setback for the plaintiffs.

At least that's the assertion offered by U.S. Department of Justice lawyer Wendy Ertmer, representing the DEA at a federal court hearing Nov. 14 in Bismarck, where she insisted before U.S. District Judge Daniel Hovland that the agency's «administrative process» for granting the permits to grow the crop is, in fact, «not futile.»

A U.S. District Court in San Francisco will be the setting for a first - ever hearing on the science of climate change, scheduled for March 21 by William Alsup, a federal judge.

With a decision that could have far - reaching implications, a federal judge in California has ordered the first ever U.S. court hearing on climate science for a «public nuisance» lawsuit, meaning that major oil and gas companies for the first time may have to go on the record regarding what they knew about the planetary impacts of their products — and when.

In the U.S. Federal appellate courts, and maybe all of the state appellate courts, they have a procedure (as I understand it) by which a judge of the appellate court who wasn't on the hearing panel can request the full court reconsider the decision.

I took a few days off last week and was disappointed to return and find that the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had issued a decision barring the webcasting of a hearing in a recording industry file - sharing case pending in federal court in BoCourt of Appeals had issued a decision barring the webcasting of a hearing in a recording industry file - sharing case pending in federal court in Bocourt in Boston.

The latest procedural dispute between Apple and Google (Motorola) is over which U.S. appeals court — the Federal Circuit or the Seventh Circuit — should hear the parties» cross-appeal of a FRAND contract ruling handed down in November 2012 by the United States District Court for the Western District of Wiscocourt — the Federal Circuit or the Seventh Circuit — should hear the parties» cross-appeal of a FRAND contract ruling handed down in November 2012 by the United States District Court for the Western District of WiscoCourt for the Western District of Wisconsin.

Of the hundreds of federal subagencies today, just three of those subagencies — the Social Security Administration, Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals, and the U.S. Immigration Court — are reported to maintain a backlog of approximately 3 million cases.

Supreme Court to hear challenge to public - sector union fees, Reuters Federal court strikes down abortion ultrasound law in Kentucky, Reuters International Russia tells U.S. to step back from dispute over military observation flights, Reuters Turkey's Erdogan links fate of detained U.S. pastor to wanted cleric Gulen, ReCourt to hear challenge to public - sector union fees, Reuters Federal court strikes down abortion ultrasound law in Kentucky, Reuters International Russia tells U.S. to step back from dispute over military observation flights, Reuters Turkey's Erdogan links fate of detained U.S. pastor to wanted cleric Gulen, Recourt strikes down abortion ultrasound law in Kentucky, Reuters International Russia tells U.S. to step back from dispute over military observation flights, Reuters Turkey's Erdogan links fate of detained U.S. pastor to wanted cleric Gulen, Reuters

But the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at Richmond, Virginia, held that the hearing was prohibited by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which provides that if a federal habeas petitioner has «failed to develop the factual basis of a claim in state court proceedings,» a federal habeas court «shall not hold an evidentiary hearing on the claim» regardless of the reasons for this faiCourt of Appeals at Richmond, Virginia, held that the hearing was prohibited by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which provides that if a federal habeas petitioner has «failed to develop the factual basis of a claim in state court proceedings,» a federal habeas court «shall not hold an evidentiary hearing on the claim» regardless of the reasons for this faicourt proceedings,» a federal habeas court «shall not hold an evidentiary hearing on the claim» regardless of the reasons for this faicourt «shall not hold an evidentiary hearing on the claim» regardless of the reasons for this failure.

On Tuesday of this week, while the rest of the United States is going to the polls, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument in Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, et al..

We regularly represent clients in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Boards of Contract Appeals, agency hearings, arbitration panels and various state or local tribunals in connection with claims and performance disputes, bid protests, SBA size and status protests and civil fraud under the False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Act.

denied, 541 U.S. 1085 (2004): A federal appeals court held that federal courts should abstain from hearing a constitutional challenge to the canons by a judge who was the subject of an imminent disciplinary proceeding; instead, the judge must raise his constitutional claims in the disciplinary process itself.

Tomorrow, the U.S. Supreme Court hears an incredibly important case called Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, stemming from a federal lawsuit brought under the Alien Tort statute, a remarkable federal law that allows people from countries outside the United States to sue foreign individuals and multinational corporations that commit human rights violations abroad - like torture, crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocide, disappearances, summary execution, that kind of thing.

In the May 26, 2008 of Texas Lawyer, John Council had an article that begins, «In a mandamus case that could significantly alter one of the hottest federal civil dockets in Texas, the full 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments on May 22 over whether a trial judge's discretion should be limited when a party moves to transfer venue.

Yesterday the Federal Circuit heard oral argument on the mandamus petition filed by TC Heartland in an underlying case lodged in the District Court of Delaware (The underlying case is Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. TC Heartland LLC, case number 1:14 - cv - 00028, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware).

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday will hear oral arguments in a landmark case over whether federal law enforcement can force...

Michael Koribanics, attorney for Chmielarz, told the E-Commerce Times on Tuesday that his client planned to enter a not guilty plea at a hearing scheduled for later in the day before U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael Hammer in Newark federal court.

The court is expected to announce shortly whether it will hear Carhart v. Gonzales, another case challenging the federal abortion ban, and the Bush administration has 90 days to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Planned Parenthood v. Gonzcourt is expected to announce shortly whether it will hear Carhart v. Gonzales, another case challenging the federal abortion ban, and the Bush administration has 90 days to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Planned Parenthood v. GonzCourt to hear Planned Parenthood v. Gonzales.