Sentences with phrase «u.s. federal trial courts»

Not exact matches

A federal judge on Monday cleared the way for a U.S. government lawsuit seeking nearly $ 100 million in damages from disgraced former professional cyclist Lance Armstrong to go to trial, according to court papers.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Timothy T. Howard (R) speaks during closing arguments in the trial of Ross Ulbricht (L), the suspected operator of the underground website Silk Road, as seen in a courtroom sketch in Federal Court in New York February 4, 2015.

Reuters reported Tuesday that the U.S. Justice Department asked a federal court to start the trial March 3.

The trial will also test what remains of federal corruption law after the U.S. Supreme Court weakened it last year.

Citing disagreements on the law that have emerged in different federal appeals courts, Silver claims that at trial, U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni applied the wrong standards to money laundering, bribery and extortion charges.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to hear former Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver's bid to block his retrial on corruption charges, paving the way for a planned April 16 start to Silver's new trial in Manhattan federal cCourt on Tuesday refused to hear former Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver's bid to block his retrial on corruption charges, paving the way for a planned April 16 start to Silver's new trial in Manhattan federal courtcourt.

The Menendez case was the first major federal bribery trial since the U.S. Supreme Court in 2016 threw out the conviction of Republican former Gov. Bob McDonnell of Virginia and narrowed the definition of bribery.

U.S. Rep. Michael Grimm learned on Tuesday that he will not go on trial in federal court in December, as originally scheduled.

Today, the U.S. Appeals Court for the Second Circuit denied disgraced former Bronx Assemblyman Eric Stevenson's appeal of his federal trial judge's order seizing his pension contributions assets that can be used to pay his $ 22,000 restitution penalty.

Sheldon Silver, who for years was one of the most powerful politicians in the state, was «blinded by greed,» Assistant U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said in opening statements at Silver's bribery trial in federal court in Manhattan.

The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear former Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver's bid to block his retrial on corruption charges, paving the way for a planned April 16 start to the Manhattan Democrat's new trial in federal cCourt refused to hear former Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver's bid to block his retrial on corruption charges, paving the way for a planned April 16 start to the Manhattan Democrat's new trial in federal courtcourt.

SILVER was sentenced in Manhattan federal court by U.S. District Judge Valerie E. Caproni who also presided over the five - week jury trial.

Federal prosecutors argue in court papers that former state Sen. John Sampson doesn't deserve a new trial despite the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDoncourt papers that former state Sen. John Sampson doesn't deserve a new trial despite the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonCourt's recent decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

Federal prosecutors in a letter to U.S. District Court Judge Valerie Caproni filed Thursday signaled they will present evidence at the corruption trial of a former aide to Gov. Andrew Cuomo that a Connecticut lobbyist sought an internship for his daughter at the the energy company linked to the case.

A New York federal judge ruled Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos and his son can stay free on bail while appealing their convictions on corruption charges, saying jury instructions in their trial could be flawed in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

Testifying last week in the federal corruption trial of state Sen. Dean Skelos (R - Rockville Centre), Walker confirmed that the U.S. attorney office for New York's Eastern District is probing his role in «county contracts given to some of your political campaign contributors,» as prosecutors phrased it in court.

Also, FDA clears the party drug ecstasy for post-traumatic stress disorder clinical trials, and U.S. courts rule that the federal government must consider the impacts of major energy projects on climate change.

ZUG, Switzerland; CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts; BERKELEY, California; DUBLIN, Ireland; July 25, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE)-- CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ: CRSP), Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTLA), Caribou Biosciences, Inc. and ERS Genomics, Ltd. announced that The Regents of the University of California, the University of Vienna, and Dr. Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively «UC»), co-owners of foundational intellectual property relating to CRISPR / Cas9 genome engineering, today submitted an appellate brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the «Federal Circuit») seeking reversal of a decision by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board («PTAB») in an interference proceeding relating to CRISPR / Cas9 gene editing technology.

Appeal seeks reversal of Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision terminating interference without determining priority of inventorship of CRISPR / Cas9 gene editing Brief asserts that the Board failed to properly apply controlling U.S. Supreme Court and Federal Circuit precedents, and ignored evidence of multiple groups readily applying CRISPR / Cas9 gene editing to eukaryotic cells following teachings of Charpentier - Doudna team

The Apple e-book price - fixing trial finally got underway in U.S. federal court in Manhattan last week.

And so it is with Google's entry into the legal research field with its announcement yesterday that Google Scholar now allows users to search full - text legal opinions from U.S. federal and state appellate and trial courts.

We have represented plaintiffs and defendants in more than 100 trials and legal proceedings in all forums — state, federal and foreign courts; arbitration and mediation inside and outside the United States; and administrative proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), the USPTO and international patent offices.

Matthew Moffa has a broad intellectual property practice that includes litigating patent infringement claims before the federal courts, prosecuting patents for high - tech companies, and practicing before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

«A Deep Bench»: Today in The New York Times, Senior U.S. District Judge Ann Aldrich (N.D. Ohio), along with her judicial law clerks, Alex Frondorf and Richard J. Hawkins, have an op - ed that begins, «To succeed Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court, President Obama should select a nominee with experience that no other sitting justice has — service as a trial judge on a federal district court.&rCourt, President Obama should select a nominee with experience that no other sitting justice has — service as a trial judge on a federal district court.&rcourt.»

Federal criminal lawyers practice in a court where the jury trial «right» under the U.S. Constitution no longer truly exists as a right freely available.

It has appeared in more than 100 court filings, including in the U.S. Supreme Court, 9 federal courts of appeals, 14 federal district courts, 8 state supreme courts, 14 state appellate courts, and one state trial ccourt filings, including in the U.S. Supreme Court, 9 federal courts of appeals, 14 federal district courts, 8 state supreme courts, 14 state appellate courts, and one state trial cCourt, 9 federal courts of appeals, 14 federal district courts, 8 state supreme courts, 14 state appellate courts, and one state trial courtcourt.

Joel served as lead counsel in many landmark cases in both trial and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and participated in shaping several important pieces of federal legislation enforced by the FDA.

The federal racketeering trial of James «Whitey» Bulger kicks off today in U.S. District Court in Boston.

Judge William G. Young At the recent annual meeting of the Massachusetts Bar Foundation, U.S. District Judge William G. Young, in accepting the Great Friend of Justice Award, delivered a thoughtful and impassioned speech decrying the decrease in jury trials in the federal courts.

I just came across this Bureau of Justice Statistics report, «Federal Tort Trials and Verdicts, 2002 - 03», released in August, showing that the number of tort trials concluded in U.S. district courts declined by nearly 80 percent from 1985 to 2003 — from 3,600 trials in 1985 to fewer than 800 trials inTrials and Verdicts, 2002 - 03», released in August, showing that the number of tort trials concluded in U.S. district courts declined by nearly 80 percent from 1985 to 2003 — from 3,600 trials in 1985 to fewer than 800 trials intrials concluded in U.S. district courts declined by nearly 80 percent from 1985 to 2003 — from 3,600 trials in 1985 to fewer than 800 trials intrials in 1985 to fewer than 800 trials intrials in 2003.

Under Article I, Congress has created the U.S. territorial courts, the U.S. Tax Court, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and other administrative courts and tribunals.

On August 12, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted rehearing en banc to appellants in In re Aqua Products, Inc to consider the procedures used by the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to limit the ability of patent owners to amend claims during AIA post-grant proceedings.

Our forensics practice has lead internal and external forensic engagements in the U.S. and abroad for global companies, government, and international non-profits, served as forensic expert witness in hundreds of trials, and appointed by federal and state court judges as forensic neutrals.

Additionally, Joe has handled civil appeals in the United States Supreme Court, Federal Tenth Circuit, Federal Eleventh Circuit, the Alabama Civil Court of Appeals, the Alabama Supreme Court, all State Trial and Appellate Courts for Florida including the U.S. District Court for the Middle and Northern Districts of Florida.

But, the decision leaves Congress with the option of potentially changing that statute which currently limits the personal jurisdiction of federal trial courts to that of a state court of general jurisdiction in the same state, as it already does in cases that are predominantly «in rem» (e.g. interpleader cases and interstate boundary and real property title disputes), in bankruptcy cases, and with respect to the subpoena power of U.S. District Ccourts to that of a state court of general jurisdiction in the same state, as it already does in cases that are predominantly «in rem» (e.g. interpleader cases and interstate boundary and real property title disputes), in bankruptcy cases, and with respect to the subpoena power of U.S. District CourtsCourts.

In an en banc decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the appeals court may review the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's determination, in connection with a decision to institute inter partes review under 35 U.S.C. § 314, that a petition is not time - barred undCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the appeals court may review the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's determination, in connection with a decision to institute inter partes review under 35 U.S.C. § 314, that a petition is not time - barred undcourt may review the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's determination, in connection with a decision to institute inter partes review under 35 U.S.C. § 314, that a petition is not time - barred under...

Exclusive federal jurisdiction at the trial level, combined with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's exclusive jurisdiction over patent appeals, helps to ensure the uniform application of patent law natifederal jurisdiction at the trial level, combined with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's exclusive jurisdiction over patent appeals, helps to ensure the uniform application of patent law natiFederal Circuit's exclusive jurisdiction over patent appeals, helps to ensure the uniform application of patent law nationwide.

The Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that the USPTO acted within its authority in promulgating rules requiring the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to...

The case presents two procedural issues under the AIA trial format: First, whether the PTAB should construe claims during an IPR using the USPTO's «broadest reasonable interpretation» (or «BRI») construction standard; and second, whether the PTAB's decision to institute review is subject to review by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Our skilled and experienced lawyers at the Keen Law Offices, LLC practice before all state and federal trial courts and appeals courts in Utah, including the Utah Supreme Court, the Ninth and Tenth U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court, the Executive Office for Immigration Review and the Board of Immigration Apcourts and appeals courts in Utah, including the Utah Supreme Court, the Ninth and Tenth U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court, the Executive Office for Immigration Review and the Board of Immigration Apcourts in Utah, including the Utah Supreme Court, the Ninth and Tenth U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court, the Executive Office for Immigration Review and the Board of Immigration ApCourts of Appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court, the Executive Office for Immigration Review and the Board of Immigration Appeals.

In a recent decision, a three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) acted properly in issuing a final decision as to some — but not all — claims challenged in...

On August 12, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted rehearing en banc to appellants in In re Aqua Products, Inc to consider the procedures used by the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to limit the ability of patent owners to amend claims during...

Prominently featured in the LTN piece was Senior U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf, who last February launched the blog Hercules and the Umpire and quickly found notoriety when he published a post in which he declared, «A lot of what the Supreme Court does is simply irrelevant to what federal trial judges do on a daily basis.»

For example, the legal fight in the U.S. to hold bans on same sex marriage to be unconstitutional was fought in and resulted in ruling in dozens of courts at the trial court and state appellate court, and federal intermediate appellate court level before a uniform ruling was established by the U.S. Supreme Ccourt and state appellate court, and federal intermediate appellate court level before a uniform ruling was established by the U.S. Supreme Ccourt, and federal intermediate appellate court level before a uniform ruling was established by the U.S. Supreme Ccourt level before a uniform ruling was established by the U.S. Supreme CourtCourt.

The New York - based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will remain closed through Friday, along with federal trial and bankruptcy courts in Manhattan; Newark, N.J.; and Trenton, N.J., according to court websites and a summary by the Administrative Office of the U.S. CoCourt of Appeals will remain closed through Friday, along with federal trial and bankruptcy courts in Manhattan; Newark, N.J.; and Trenton, N.J., according to court websites and a summary by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Ccourts in Manhattan; Newark, N.J.; and Trenton, N.J., according to court websites and a summary by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Cocourt websites and a summary by the Administrative Office of the U.S. CourtsCourts.

These include: United States v. Resendiz - Ponce, which presents the question whether the omission of an element from a federal indictment can constitute harmless error (9th Circuit says no); Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., on whether a provider of pay phone services can sue a long distance carrier for alleged violations of the Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture ofederal indictment can constitute harmless error (9th Circuit says no); Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., on whether a provider of pay phone services can sue a long distance carrier for alleged violations of the Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture oFederal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture on them.

He litigates matters in state and federal courts as well as patent validity issues before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

He is registered to practice with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and represents clients in federal and state courts, before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and in arbitfederal and state courts, before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and in arbitFederal Circuit, and in arbitration.

Robert O» Hale Board Certified Specialist in State and Federal Courts Certified by NC State Bar as a specialist in criminal law in both State and Federal Court Legal Elite Best Lawyers in America Best Lawyers in NC Super Lawyer AV Rating - Martindale Hubbell (Highest Rating Possible) Top 100 U.S Trial Lawyers Top 100 U.S. DWI Lawyers Nation's Top 1 % Percent Attorney See AVVO Ratings and Reviews

In addition to his trial practice, Don has extensive experience in appellate litigation, including appearances before the United States Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and many other state and federal Federal Circuit, and many other state and federal federal courts.