Not exact matches
Senators Biden, Metzenbaum, and Kennedy, relying in part upon the «expertise» of the noted Harvard legal
scholar Laurence Tribe, fashioned a lengthy laundry list of political and
constitutional horrors that would presumably follow upon Bork's elevation to the
U.S. Supreme Court.
Donald Trump is taking his time in responding to Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, which
constitutional scholars describe as the most significant
U.S. Supreme Court abortion ruling in a decade.
This would leave the question of which particular
U.S. District Court was the proper one to file in as a question of venue (which does not have a
constitutional dimension) rather than a question of jurisdiction (which is subject to
constitutional considerations), and many legal
scholars have urged Congress to do just that.
The changes have come in the wake of a growing movement across the state, led by legal
scholars, immigration attorneys and youth advocates who have contended for years that these referrals to the
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency violate a state law created to protect a juvenile's privacy, as well as the
constitutional rights of these minors.