The details won't be out for another week, but in their version of the 2013 budget for the Department of Energy (DOE), legislators on a spending panel in the House of Representatives would reverse dramatic cuts to
the U.S. fusion research program that the White House proposed in February.
Not exact matches
Dr. Peter Turchi, who worked on
fusion experiments in the 1970s, including Linus for the
U.S. Naval
Research Lab, also concludes that General
Fusion has several technical advantages now that could help them succeed.
Users of NIF include scientists from the
U.S. Department of Energy national laboratories, worldwide
fusion energy and high - energy density science
research centers, academia, and other national and international facilities.
NIF users include scientists from the
U.S. Department of Energy national laboratories, worldwide
fusion energy and high energy density science
research centers, academia, and other national and international sources.
The trio's hunt for the cause of big blackouts grew out of the two physicists»
research on
fusion energy at the
U.S. Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee.
The
U.S. National Ignition Facility will devote less time to energy
research going forward, after failing to demonstrate the principles of a futuristic
fusion power plant
The president's request also calls for cuts to
fusion work at NIF and an immediate axing of funding to the Nike laser at the
U.S. Naval
Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, D.C. «The loss of NRL and eventual loss of LLE would greatly reduce the physics capability and innovation in the ICF program,» says NRL's Stephen Obenschain.
The request came as the
U.S. program was struggling to maintain a viable
research program amid stagnant budgets and the growing financial commitment to ITER, which is consuming an increasingly large share of
U.S. fusion funding.
That conclusion will please many scientists in the field who have been concerned that the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory — the world's largest and most advanced inertial
fusion facility — was poised to dominate the
U.S. research effort.
With further increases in ITER payments required in coming years, can
fusion research in the
U.S. survive?
If the president's request is approved by Congress it will put a severe squeeze on the
U.S. domestic
fusion program and will force the closure of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Alcator C - Mod reactor, one of only three large machines, known as tokamaks, in the United States that are doing vital
research in preparation for ITER.
In the past 15 years,
research in the
U.S. and other countries has increased by 10,000,000 times the
fusion power level produced in experiments, and we have now achieved production of 10 megawatts of
fusion power on the Tokamak
Fusion Test Reactor at Princeton.
Given the high projected cost of creating a burning physics experiment and given that the
U.S. now funds only about one sixth of the world
research effort, a strategy based on international collaboration on
fusion energy
research and development can be highly cost effective.
Some lawmakers say it may be time for the United States to bow out, especially as the growing ITER commitment threatens to starve
U.S. - based
fusion research programs.
The Obama Administration has proposed slashing spending on the domestic
fusion research by 16 % in the 2013 fiscal year that begins on 1 October and is using the savings to help pay for the
U.S. contribution to the international
fusion experiment ITER, under construction in Cadarache, France.
Acting on two (of 12) spending bills under its jurisdiction, the panel agreed on Wednesday to increase the president's request for
fusion research at the Department of Energy by a total of $ 76 million, including $ 48 million more for the domestic program and $ 28 million for the
U.S. contribution to the ITER
fusion reactor being built in France.
As a result, one leading national laboratory began to impose mandatory 2 - day - per - month «unpaid holidays» on its science staff, several laboratories began laying off researchers, the
U.S. portion of the international program to develop plentiful energy through nuclear
fusion was reduced to «survival mode,» America's firms continued to spend three times more on litigation than
research, and many young would - be scientists presumably began reconsidering their careers.
The PPPL Off - Site University
Research (OSUR) Program provides scientific outreach to a broad range of
U.S. colleges and universities in various areas of plasma and
fusion science.
New
research indicates that understanding the combined heating shows how we could improve the production of
fusion in ITER and other next - generation
fusion facilities — a key finding of physicists at the
U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), the DIII - D National
Fusion Facility that General Atomics operates for the DOE, and other collaborators.
«
U.S. fusion - energy
research has well - defined goals and programs,» says Logan.
The
Fusion Energy Sciences Postdoctoral
Research Program offers recent doctoral degree recipients the opportunity to conduct research in the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) fusion energy research and development p
Research Program offers recent doctoral degree recipients the opportunity to conduct
research in the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) fusion energy research and development p
research in the
U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE)
fusion energy
research and development p
research and development programs.
Francis «Rip» William Perkins Jr., a pioneering plasma physicist whose contributions to the
U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) ranged from seminal advances in
fusion energy and astrophysical
research to the education of a generation of scientists, died on July 26 in Boulder, Colo..
As a past leader of the
U.S. federal
fusion program, I played a significant role in establishing tokamak
research to the
U.S., and I had high hopes for its success.
At this moment,
research investment by the rest of the world — China, Korea, the EU — is surging in magnetic
fusion, while the
U.S. investment is stagnating.
«Someday, the results of this
research may provide the scientific foundation for producing power through
fusion,» Smith said in his opening statements at a hearing held Tuesday on the future of
U.S. fusion energy
research.