Sentences with phrase «u.s. income per capita»

Statistics Canada has raised questions about the reliability of the measures commonly used to compare Canadian and U.S. income per capita.2 Shortcomings have been noted in the data on coverage, concept, and accuracy of hours of work.
Therefore, improving productivity in Canada is the only sustainable way to reduce the sizable gap between Canadian and U.S. income per capita that has emerged in recent decades.

Not exact matches

Far from an economic powerhouse, China's economy remains a middleweight when its vast number of poor people is taken into account — the country's per capita GDP is only around US$ 4,500, 1 / 10th that of the U.S. And as a share of the economy, household incomes have actually declined over the past decade.
As for income, Oregon's per capita personal income in 2016 was $ 45,049, 29th - highest in the U.S., according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
To pinpoint the average retirement income you would need to live comfortably throughout the U.S., GOBankingRates looked at five factors in all 50 states and the District of Columbia: Per capita spending on groceries, healthcare, gas and fuel, housing and utilities and personal consumption expenditures not included in the four other categories.
[181] Inflation - adjusted («real») per capita disposable personal income rose steadily in the U.S. from 1945 to 2008, but has since remained generally level.
Indeed, among Canada's 16 peer countries, the U.S. has the second - highest level of income per capita but also the highest rates of poverty and homicides and the lowest life expectancy.
To get an idea of the role each component of income per capita plays in the Canada — U.S. income gap, we used the equation shown above, substituting U.S. data for one component at a time, and keeping the country data for the other four components.
If Canada's level of labour productivity had increased to the U.S. level (and the other four factors had stayed the same), Canada's income per capita would have been $ 8,500 higher.
For example, to calculate what portion of the Canada-U.S. gap in income per capita is due to Canada's lower labour productivity, we substitute U.S. labour productivity into the equation but keep Canadian data for the other four components (hours worked, unemployment, labour force participation, and demographic structure).
To calculate the personal savings rate, we looked at data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) on the average income per capita for each city in the U.S..
If we use the Canadian data for four of the components, but use the U.S. productivity level (which is US$ 52.40 per hour worked) instead of the Canadian productivity level (which is US$ 41.50 per hour), the income per capita in 2011 is $ 44,638.
If Canada's ratio of employment to its labour force had decreased to the U.S. level (and the other four factors had stayed the same), Canada's income per capita would have been $ 500 lower.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, in 2016 the Massachusetts per capita personal income (PCPI) was $ 65,137, which was second - highest in the U.S. and 131 % of the national average, at $ 49,571.
From 1820 to 1994 the real per capita income of the U.S. increased by...
In India, for example, the average life expectancy is 301/2 years, compared to 681/2 years in the United States; the average annual income is less than $ 40, compared to $ 1,469 in the U.S. Energy utilized annually per capita, which is a rough index of living standard, is in some countries equivalent to.02 tons of coal, compared to 8 tons, or 400 times as much, in the U.S.. Two thirds of the world usually goes to bed hungry at night.
After adjusting for inflation, the per capita expenditures of the lowest - income one fifth of the U.S. population today exceed the per capita income of the median American household in 1955.
Qatar's economy grew 24 percent in 2006 alone, according to the U.S. State Department, and its per capita income that year was $ 61,540.
Few people know that The Bahamas have the third - highest per capita income in North America (after the U.S. and Canada), but Marvin does.
You read that the correlations are really phenomenal, that the U.S. is between four and five times the world average per capita income, between four and five times the world average per capita energy consumption and between four and five times the world average per capita CO2 emissions.
Note that the curve is not plotting GDP, which would grow with population and the overall size of the U.S. economy, but GDP per capita, which reflects something like the average income of each individual.
According to the National Research Council (2011), U.S. advances in science and technology account for «more than half of the tremendous growth to per capita income in the 20th century.»
The lowest of the four points in the figure represents the real per - capita income and the high - school enrollment rate in the United States in 1900, just before the expansion of secondary - school education as a result of the U.S. «high - school movement.»
To pinpoint the average retirement income you would need to live comfortably throughout the U.S., GOBankingRates looked at five factors in all 50 states and the District of Columbia: Per capita spending on groceries, healthcare, gas and fuel, housing and utilities and personal consumption expenditures not included in the four other categories.
The highest U.S. areas that receive benefits (in per - capita dollars) are in low - income areas.
The lack of correlation between income per capita and transportation and electricity emission per capita demonstrates that, at least among states of the U.S., there is no rigid relationship between affluence and emissions.
In the U.S., the average of per - capita income that goes toward taxes is 9.9 percent.
It has some of the wealthiest communities in the nation, while others are quite the opposite; Hartford, for example is one of the 10 communities with the lowest per capita incomes in the U.S. Heavy industry is a key driver of the Connecticut economy, with production of transportation equipment, especially helicopters, aircraft parts, and nuclear submarines; heavy industrial machinery and electrical equipment; military weaponry; fabricated metal products; chemical and pharmaceutical products; and scientific instruments.
The per capita expenditure was calculated by dividing a state's home visiting investment by the number of estimated low - income infants and toddlers who live at or below 125 percent of poverty, based on the U.S. Census's Current Population Survey.
In 2016, Connecticut had the highest per capita personal income (PCPI) in the U.S. at $ 71,033, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
As for income, Oregon's per capita personal income in 2016 was $ 45,049, 29th - highest in the U.S., according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
The per capita personal income (PCPI) which helps indicate the economic quality of life, was $ 43,567 for Nevadans in 2016, and ranked 34th in the U.S..
Combined, the three cities represent almost 4.4 million people; and, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce, West Palm Beach's 1996 per capita income ($ 33,518) was the highest in Florida, while Fort Lauderdale ($ 24,706) and Miami ($ 20,014) ranked in the top 20.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z