«While the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence (ODNI) does not dispute the CIA's analysis of Russian hacking operations, it has not endorsed their assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, The position of the ODNI, which oversees the 17 agency - strong U.S. intelligence community, could press his assertion that no evidence implicates Russia in the cyber attacks..
Intelligence (ODNI) does not dispute the CIA's analysis of Russian hacking operations, it has not endorsed their
assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, The position of the ODNI, which oversees the 17 agency - strong
U.S. intelligence community, could press his assertion that no evidence implicates Russia in the cyber attacks..
intelligence community, could press his assertion that no evidence implicates Russia in the cyber attacks...» 17!
The objective was «supporting radical groups, users dissatisfied with [the] social and economic situation and oppositional social movements,» echoing the
intelligence assessment's central view that Russia began its election interference to heighten domestic
U.S. political discord.