Wiley, Director of Asia Society's International Studies Schools Network, blogs from Helsinki about the differences in how Finland and
the U.S. value their teachers.
Not exact matches
In recent years, 14 states in the
U.S. have begun assessing
teachers and schools using
Value - Added Models, or VAMs.
Educators can then apply the
value of the gift card to any classroom project at DonorsChoose or a project they create themselves, if they are eligible
U.S. public - school
teachers.
Fully 82 % of
teachers believe it is especially important to teach foreign - born students to
value the
U.S. and the meaning of citizenship, and 89 % of
teachers working with ELL students say the same.
Teacher Supply, Demand, and Shortages in the
U.S.» Although initial coverage mainly took the report at face
value, others have started to push back.
As a mark of the expected
value of OER, a number of major philanthropic organizations, including the Hewlett Foundation, Next Generation Learning Challenges (NGLC), and the CK - 12 Foundation, are investing in the creation and development of OER content and OER curation tools; and the
U.S. Department of Education (DOE) has a project, called the Learning Registry, which helps make OER content easier for
teachers to find.
Within a series of prior posts (see, for example, here and here), I have written about what the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), passed in December of 2015, means for the
U.S., or more specifically states» school and
teacher evaluation systems as per the federal government's prior mandates requiring their use of growth and
value - added models (VAMs).
The
U.S. Department of Education should support ongoing research to establish the validity and reliability of comprehensive
teacher evaluation programs, further examine the efficacy of
value added models of
teacher evaluation, and support adequate training and professional development of evaluators to insure fidelity of implementation of evaluation models found to be effective in improving teaching and learning.
A study released yesterday by Mathematica Policy Research (and sponsored by the
U.S. Department of Education) titled «
Teachers with High «Value Added» Can Boost Test Scores in Low - Performing Schools» implies that, yet again, value - added estimates are the key statistical indicators we as a nation should be using, above all else, to make pragmatic and policy decisions about America's public school t
Teachers with High «
Value Added» Can Boost Test Scores in Low - Performing Schools» implies that, yet again, value - added estimates are the key statistical indicators we as a nation should be using, above all else, to make pragmatic and policy decisions about America's public school teac
Value Added» Can Boost Test Scores in Low - Performing Schools» implies that, yet again,
value - added estimates are the key statistical indicators we as a nation should be using, above all else, to make pragmatic and policy decisions about America's public school teac
value - added estimates are the key statistical indicators we as a nation should be using, above all else, to make pragmatic and policy decisions about America's public school
teachersteachers.
Some proponents of
teacher evaluation reforms have conjectured that if districts would eliminate the bottom 5 to 10 percent of
teachers each year, as measured by
value - added student test scores,
U.S. student achievement would increase by a substantial amount — enough to catch up to high - achieving countries like Finland.3 However, there is no real - world evidence to support this idea and quite a bit to dispute it.
Value - added assessment of
U.S. teacher preparation programs: A critical evaluation.
Whereas most
U.S. districts are mired in antiquated
teacher assessment models, there are indeed some progressive schools and districts that have endeavored to create evaluation systems that truly
value the professional learning of
teachers.