Sentences with phrase «us ethanol subsidies»

Also in the Post, Terence Corcoran wonders whether Corn Cob Bob — the friendly spokesmascot for the Canadian Renewable Fuels Association — will survive its ongoing battle with the C.D. Howe Institute, which recently released a report questioning the environmental and economic justifications for corn ethanol subsidies.

But clean energy with hundreds of thousands of new jobs is still in our future, and the administration has already begun by supporting further ethanol subsidies, which the «best science» — and not mere politics — has proven to be a boon to the environment.

As a business owner in renewable energy, I'd wager to say that most business - minded environmentalist think ethanol subsidies are a giant waste of money and damage the environment to boot.

In another stroke of luck, New York dairy farmers have been well - positioned in recent years because they tend to grow much of their own feed corn, putting them at a competitive advantage over their larger California competitors: West Coast dairies are struggling with the high price of corn brought on by international demand, drought conditions and ethanol subsidies.

Second, the U.S. should end its misguided corn - to - ethanol subsidies.

The World Bank has called for an end to ethanol subsidies.

Be sure and thank your legislators for corn - based ethanol subsidies.

Today, however, particularly in the US, those choices are cushioned by energy prices that don't even reflect what it costs to produce the energy (say «ethanol subsidies» three times), no carbon taxes, and no tax on oil to represent its real or even imagined threats to national security.

Yes, reporters can do better, but it's not an open secret that the greatest promoter of ethanol subsidies was powerful Republican senator Bob Dole:

The denial of market forces in the US by all politicians, in favor of market farces like ethanol subsidies, in a way emphasis the effectiveness of prices as one instrument.

He'll be running against a guy who has been against ethanol subsidies for years.

For different reasons, sugar subsidies, ethanol subsidies, corn and wheat subsidies, really just about any farm subsidies that aren't based on preventing soil erosion.

(Read here for more on this: «Sanity Alert: Senate Votes to End Billions in Ethanol Subsidies.»)

The efforts we've made to criminalize the act of checking out are scandalous and in a different world, one without ethanol subsidies or ear marks, we might see an end to it.

It's not coal to liquids per se that is hair brained, it is that we would subsidized such an expensive, carbon intensive process, if indeed we have any money left over after our ethanol subsidies.

The provision is the latest installment of the ethanol subsidy, a handout that has cost American taxpayers billions of dollars during the last three decades, with little to show for it.

«Direct cash payments to corn growers would be more economical than attempting to boost farm income through ethanol subsidies,» the report concluded.

In Iowa last month, possible Republican candidate Newt Gingrich derided «big - city attacks» on ethanol subsidies.

Imagine if instead of spending over $ 2 billion a year in direct ethanol subsidies, we directed that money into conservation measures.

Ethanol subsidies once included a high tariff and generous tax credits, both of which expired at the end of 2011.

The fifth point is that no coherent justification has ever been given for ethanol subsidies or mandates once its pollution and CO2 - emission reduction claims were exploded.

Along with EV charging, Ebell said the inclusion of ethanol subsidies in the amended resolution could spell trouble for the effort if it is brought up again in New Orleans.

«Until cellulosic ethanol production is feasible, or corn - ethanol technology improves, corn - ethanol subsidies are a poor investment economically and environmentally,» Jackson explained.

Former OMB analyst Ken Glozer demolishes the energy - security rationale for ethanol subsidies in Corn Ethanol: Who Pays, Who Benefits (April 2011), published by the conservative Hoover Institution.

Stripped of original language that would have eliminated a small ethanol subsidy, Senate Bill 888 was rearmed as a guided missile aimed at... Complete story»

They also spoke out against the former president's calls for larger ethanol subsidies.»

Are ethanol subsidies making Earth a better place?

MCCAIN CRITICIZES ETHANOL SUBSIDIES http://www.cbsnews.com/­blogs/­2008/­07/­18/­politics/­fromtheroad/­entry4271518.shtml From the Road column July 18, 2008, 11:32 AM McCain's Tough Talk to Auto Workers From CBS News» John Bentley

The Trump decision to permit year - round 15 - per - cent blends may be a shell game of another kind, since it's expected to be coupled with a transfer of ethanol subsidies from U.S. domestic consumption to exports, a move that could decimate ethanol use in the U.S..

But the models fail to account for dynamic reactions to a corn crop reduction (in this case a simple and very cost efficient response would be to end corn ethanol subsidies, thus redirecting corn to food rather than fuel, ending an inefficient industry and encouraging ethanol industries in tropical nations using sugar cane, which makes a lot more sense than corn ethanol).

You kill corn ethanol subsidies.

«We oppose ethanol subsidies because they distort economic signals about price and demand and create inefficiencies that divert resources from productive activities to politically favored ones.

The legislation in Congress that it backed in the name of fighting global warming contained ethanol subsidies, even though ethanol subsidies have been linked to famine, hunger, food riots, and political unrest in poor countries.

Ed Schafer, the U.S. agriculture secretary, tried to deflect blame from the ethanol subsidies, claiming biofuel production only accounted for 2 - 3 % of the rise in food prices.

Jacques Diouf, its head, reserved most of his reprobation for the U.S.'s billions of corn ethanol subsidies (roughly $ 12b in 2006), which he said were depriving developing countries of food, reports The Guardian's Julian Borger.He accused the U.S. of diverting close to 100 million tons of cereals from human consumption to «satisfy a thirst for fuel for vehicles.»

The corn - to - ethanol subsidy in the USA was not aimed at reducing GHG emissions, or even its ostensible purpose of reducing dependence on foreign oil, but at raising the price of corn to put money into farmers» pockets.

Regardless, dropping ethanol subsidies is probably a smart idea — corn ethanol is a huge water and energy suck, some speculate its production has led to food shortages, and is generally far from the fuel of the future it was once hoped to be.

A measure that would remove roughly $ 6 billion in annual ethanol subsidies just passed the U.S. Senate, signaling, among other things, a shift in public attitude towards the once - heralded alternative fuel.

He has been clear in his support for ethanol and ethanol subsidies.

In 2006 ethanol subsidies were costing the taxpayer billions of dollars in addition to what they paid at the pumps.

Obama's continued support of ethanol subsidies is one of the few positives in his energy policy, IMO.

Not exact matches

Prime Minister Stephen Harper also unveiled $ 1.5 billion in subsidies for ethanol and biodiesel production this past summer.

With the help of government subsidies, companies are investing in converting wood fibre (known as biomass) into ethanol and diesel.

Subsidies could also impact your grocery bill in the near future: the diversion of soybeans, corn and other edibles to ethanol production leaves less farmland to feed an every - growing world population.

In 2008, subsidies to produce corn ethanol reduced the amount of corn available for food.

Meanwhile, new reports in the United States showed that two million acres of native grasslands have been converted to corn and soy monocultures in the past five years alone, driven in part by government subsidies and targets for the ethanol industry.

«GMA applauds today's overwhelming and bi-partisan support for an amendment offered by Senators Feinstein and Coburn to end wasteful subsidies for corn ethanol.

Continuing the $ 1 - per - gallon subsidy for cellulosic ethanol and the renewable fuel standards will also help.

When you go to Washington to get stuff, sometimes you get the wrong stuff, like subsidies for corn ethanol — the wrong feedstock for the wrong fuel.

Corn ethanol would have never been able to make it on its thermodynamic merits, and w / o subsidies would have been dead in the water years ago *.