Sentences with phrase «us nuclear forces»

Russian President Vladimir Putin gave a wild state of the nation address to the country's elites on Thursday, and he chose to conclude the speech by hyping up a bunch of doomsday nuclear devices and threatening to retaliate against anyone who attacks the US with nuclear force.

«It is a fatal miscalculation if the countries (in the United Nations) would even think that they can delay or hold in check the eye - opening development of the (North's) nuclear forces even for a moment,» a spokesman for North Korea said, Reuters reported.

«Neither shall we flinch even an inch from the road to bolstering up the nuclear forces chosen by ourselves, unless the hostile policy and nuclear threat of the U.S. against the DPRK are fundamentally eliminated.»

Russia has said it plans to add several subs to its Black Sea fleet, which is a point of focus for Moscow — along with the Northern fleet, which has Russia's sea - based nuclear forces and is based close to NATO territory in Norway.

Kim said Tuesday his country would keep making «more latest weapons and equipment» to «bolster up the nuclear force in quality and quantity», the country's official news agency KCNA reported.

Consisting of Los Angeles, Seawolf, Virginia and Ohio - class boats, this all - nuclear force is silent and deadly, prowling the world's waterways without anybody the wiser.

cited growing pressure on nuclear - disarmament treaties like the Intermediate - Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) and ongoing security concerns in Eastern and Central Europe.

«We're modernizing and creating a brand - new nuclear force.

If you can satisfactorily explain strong nuclear forces and weak gravitational forces and dark matter without creating an even more complicated model to try to get all the pieces to fit, please write a paper and let the Nobel committee know.

Anti-falling physicists have been theorizing for decades about the «electromagnetic force,» the «weak nuclear force,» the «strong nuclear force,» and so - called «force of gravity and they tilt their findings toward trying to unite them into one force.

The laws of physic requires that there be forces and objects that interact with each other, such as the four forces now known, of gravity, electro - magnetism, the strong and weak nuclear forces (and now there is possibly dark energy) that is interwoven within matter.

Another finely tuned constant is the strong nuclear force (the force that holds atoms together).

Modern humanity has become expert in its knowledge of the scientific, exterior forces in the world — electricity, gravity or nuclear force — but we know little about the existential forces of the inner world — love, hate, hope, fear, doubt and faith.

Thanks to the mechanical devices which we increasingly charge with the burden not only of production but also of calculation, the quantity of unused human energy is growing at a disturbing rate both within us and around us; and this phenomenon will reach its climax in the near future, when nuclear forces have been harnessed to useful work.

To pick an example from the cosmology chapter, if the strong nuclear force, one of the four fundamental forces recognised by modern physics, and which controls amongst other things the burning of the Sun, were slightly larger or slightly smaller, we could not exist.

Why the strong and weak nuclear forces?

to close and we fry, to far and our sun would be dead from old age 6 - of the 3 forces (weak nuclear forces, strong nuclear forces and gravity) scientist are stumped why gravity was not evenly split like the other 2.

On the other hand, if the nuclear force were substantially weaker than what it actually is, then the complex atoms needed for biology could not hold together.

Thing is, they have no more of a clue than anyone else... Last time I checked science has no explanation for «nuclear force»... or even simpler things like..

That Whitehead excludes the weak and strong nuclear forces is understandable — these were not identified until the 1930s — but why is gravity omitted?

Where they explained the phenomena in terms of gods and spirits, we do so in terms of electrons and quarks, gravity and nuclear forces, DNA and chromosomes, immune systems and amino acids, neurons and synapses.

weak nuclear force constant if larger: too much hydrogen would convert to helium in big bang; hence, stars would convert too much matter into heavy elements making life chemistry impossible if smaller: too little helium would be produced from big bang; hence, stars would convert too little matter into heavy elements making life chemistry impossible

Popper points out that nuclear forces are thus potentialities and become operative only under conditions which are extremely rare, namely tremendous temperatures and pressures.

If anything positive can be said about this grim and ironic situation, it is that as victims of terrorism we may be forced to rethink our own policies on the use of force (including nuclear force) in order to bring them into line with our moral denunciations of terrorism.

By the way, the only way to make a 6,000 year old rock appear 4 billion years old is alter the weak nuclear force by many orders of magnitude.

Our «science» is simply a way for us to explain the world around us... nobody has ever seen a graviton but we know it warps space / time and that it interacts across vast distances but in a much smaller way than the strong nuclear force for example (which again is a made up force on our part to just understand our universe)

Pentagon documents refer to fighting a nuclear war «over a protracted period» and argue that American nuclear forces «must prevail and be able to force the Soviet Union to seek earliest termination on terms favorable to the United States.»

Or James Schlesinger, former Secretary of Defense under Nixon and Ford, one of the foremost architects of late Cold War nuclear targeting strategy and nuclear force modernization.

And since he and others argue that stateless actors are near - immune to the threat of nuclear force, the overall deterrence value of such weapons are heavily discounted.

This is where the details surrounding the capability and speed of nuclear force reconstitution come into play.

If North Korea gets an operational nuclear force, both South Korea and Japan may be prompted to go nuclear themselves.

-LSB-...] For example, the United States» nuclear force exceeds the requirements of minimal deterrence, and is structured to strike numerous targets in multiple countries and to have the ability to conduct successful counterforce strikes with high confidence.

Like I pointed out in the comments, the United States assumed that if they were in a Second Strike scenario, they would lose 97 % of their nuclear forces on First Strike.

I think moving all your nuclear forces to boomers is actually more destabilizing and scary, as it isn't a sign that you are insuring a MAD strategy, but that you intend to attempt an aggressive first strike.

But gravity is also one of the universe's four fundamental forces (the others being electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces).

Without the nuclear force, no material can exist stably.

In a recent experiment performed at the Radioactive Isotope Beam Factory at RIKEN, an international collaboration with scientists from eleven countries, led by scientists of the Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC (Spain) and the RIKEN Nishina Center (Japan), made a very surprising observation: High - energy gamma rays — which are mediated by the electromagnetic force — are emitted in the decay of a certain excited nucleus — tin 133, in competition with neutron emission, the decay mode mediated by the strong nuclear force.

Modern physics is trying to understand the nuclear force as a part of a more general «baryonic force.»

A Lambda hypernucleus consists of a Lambda particle, the lightest baryon with strangeness, in addition to protons and neutrons, so the study of Lambda hypernuclei extends our knowledge of the nuclear force to the more general «baryonic force.»

This is called as the charge symmetry of the nuclear force.

The other two forces are the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force.

And the Higgs is entirely responsible for the mass of some particles, notably the W and Z bosons that transmit the weak nuclear force.

The strong nuclear force binds quarks into protons and neutrons and sticks protons and neutrons together to make atomic nuclei.

The weak nuclear force is responsible for — well, nothing much, as far as familiar phenomena are concerned.

James Clerk Maxwell combined electricity, magnetism and light into a single theory of electromagnetism; a century later physicists added the weak nuclear force to form a unified «electroweak» theory.

The nuclear forces are short - range only, so we can ignore them in the macroscopic world.

Strings can account for all the known physical forces: gravity, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces, which cause radioactive decay.

The standard model of particle physics does a great job of accounting for the fundamental particles of nature and three of the forces that act upon them — the weak and strong nuclear forces, and the electromagnetic force.

The remaining ones — electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces — merely describe how objects move through space.

Hadron A class of subatomic particles made of quarks that interact with other particles via the strong nuclear force.