Sentences with phrase «us subsidies for fossil fuel»

Unfortunately, however, government resources are actually flowing the other way: according to a report from the U.S. - based National Resources Defense Council, since 2009, global subsidies for fossil fuels have almost tripled to an estimated US$ 775 billion this year.

We will fulfill Canada's G - 20 commitment to phase out subsidies for the fossil fuel industry.

Setting aside the fact that in many cases clean energy competes on its own merits — for instance in the case of well ‐ situated wind farms and Brazilian sugarcane ethanol — this analysis shows that the global direct subsidy for fossil fuels is around ten times the subsidy for renewables.

The momentum created by such commitments spurred dozens of nations, joined by the World Bank and other influential institutions, to pledge to cut subsidies for fossil fuels.

By contrast, subsidies for fossil fuels amounted to $ 409 billion in 2010.

These include ending subsidies for the fossil fuel industry, boosting energy efficiency, advancing renewable sources like wind and solar power and moving away from the idea that «drill baby, drill» is a solution.

The US and China will be key to the growth in PV, with the need for their governments to offer solar incentives as well as reducing subsidies for fossil fuels.

Get your vaccinations next winter, and stop gabbling after government subsidies for fossil fuels.

It does not, for example, capture subsidised research and development or subsidies for fossil fuel production.

heck you cant even get agreement on what consititutes a subsidy for the fossil fuel industry or how to end them.

This applies equally to subsidies for fossil fuels — as is being pursued at the G20 meeting coming up and in the MDG..

The European Commission today announced new subsidies for fossil fuels, with nearly $ 200 million for gas projects, as part of a larger package of energy investments for 2018.

The expected subsidy for fossil fuels during 2015 is projected to be $ 5.3 TRILLION — for one year!

Do you care, in any way shape of form, about the massive subsidies for fossil fuel usage due to externalities not within the contracted prices?

You know full well that the subsidy for fossil fuels you are quoting is not for electricity generation.

«How can the Commission call on the EIB to grant $ 2bn to a mega gas pipeline and then release a report urging the member states and the same bank to do more to reduce subsidies for fossil fuels?»

The most the G20 gathering could manage this time around on the climate front was a solemn nodding of the heads when Obama suggested that it would be a great idea if they phased out subsidies for fossil fuels.

With a renewal of the wind production tax credit, which is designed to establish parity with the subsidies for fossil fuels, growth could be even faster in the years ahead, creating thousands of new jobs.

Global subsidies for fossil fuels have returned to levels not seen since before the financial crisis in 2008, estimated at $ 523 billion to $ 1.9 trillion, according to a new report.

The international community has committed to phase out subsidies for fossil fuel use, including in the electricity sector.

Sanders, with representative Keith Ellison, recently proposed an End Polluter Welfare Act, which they say would cut $ 135bn of US subsidies for fossil fuel companies over the next decade.

Commentary: Fossil - fuel consumption subsidies are down, but not out Subsidies for fossil fuels are falling but remain much higher than those for renewables 20 December 2017

For example, a country may have an ambitious emission reduction target but its legal framework may continue to give preferential treatment to grid - based large - scale utility energy generation, or subsidies for fossil fuels.

Energy companies reap even more subsidies for fossil fuel than for renewables.

Sanders claims that his plan will reduce emissions by establishing a revenue neutral carbon tax, eliminating subsidies for fossil fuels and increasing them for renewable energy.

A recent IMF paper put the magnitude of subsidies for fossil fuel energy sources at $ 5.3 trillion worldwide in 2015, including both direct fiscal costs and implicit subsidies from the failure to charge for environmental damages or tax energy at the same rate as other consumption products.

These measures include levying a price on carbon emissions, eliminating tax subsidies for fossil fuels and ending implicit subsidies, such as leasing federal lands that contain coal or oil at rates below the fair market rate.

Oil Change International estimates that the United States spends $ 37.5 billion on subsidies for fossil fuels every year.

Democrats believe the tax code must reflect our commitment to a clean energy future by eliminating special tax breaks and subsidies for fossil fuel companies as well as defending and extending tax incentives for energy efficiency and clean energy.

Someone has already crunched the numbers for us (see link below) and found that subsidies for fossil fuels amounts to $ 15,720.69 per megawatt - hour while subsidies for solar amounts to $ 19,280.42 per megawatt - hour.

As stated before I would like to see subsidies for fossil fuel removed and also external costs such as healthcare due to air pollution factored in as that would give a true cost of power generation.

Not sure this has or ever will translate into a vote for carbon pricing or support for stronger national or international emissions targets or even clear support for renewables and an end to subsidies for fossil fuel miners and big users.

These economic reforms can and should include carbon pricing, creating more liquid and fungible energy markets arbitrated by price, dispatch and carbon and eliminated subsidies for fossil fuels.

Environmentalists, meanwhile, have been urging the G20's members to commit themselves to phasing out subsidies for fossil fuels by the year 2020.

The researchers suggested switching $ 500bn in subsidies for fossil fuels worldwide to renewables as a «cost neutral» way to fast - track the energy transition.

A new report by Oil Change International identifies billions of dollars in subsidies for fossil fuel exploration from the world's wealthiest countries.

As of November 2011, a large majority of Americans (70 %) also opposed federal subsidies for the fossil fuel industry (coal, oil, and natural gas), including majorities of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents:

Subsidies for fossil fuels have grown 45 percent under President Obama's «all - of - the - above energy» strategy; worldwide, they're estimated to top $ 600 billion.

While more than 53 countries now have publicly committed to phase - out subsidies for fossil fuels, little concrete progress has been made.

Maybe we should take the gloves off completely, and do away with all subsidies for fossil fuels (including war costs) and internize (make them pay) ALL harms — from GW, acid rain, local pollution, etc..

Of course an obvious first step would be to end subsidies for fossil fuel consumption, but I think that would require us to discuss politics...

It came across to many as a step back from the agreement of a G - 20 meeting last year in Pittsburgh, where leaders formally proposed phasing out subsidies for fossil fuels.

The women - led network hopes to bring awareness to the threat climate change poses to reproductive justice, and to end U.S. subsidies for the fossil fuel industry.

You have to pinch yourself when the government announces another new subsidy for the fossil fuel industry, not only because they so recently said that renewable energy should stand on its own two feet, but also because they're announcing this just days before the latest climate conference in Paris — at which world leaders will gather to try and hammer out a global deal to reduce emissions.

Eliminate federal subsidies for fossil fuels and re-direct those federal funds to renewable energy development and energy efficiency programs.

Q2 «Is the domestic sale of fossil fuel products in oil exporting countries at the cost of production but below international market prices a subsidy for fossil fuels, like the IMF authors assume?»

Stunt highlights that massive amounts of public money go to subsidies for fossil fuels, rather than climate finance and renewables.

But they're in the same ball park, and the Bloomberg complaint is that «This analysis shows that the global direct subsidy for fossil fuels is around ten times the subsidy for renewables.»

«This analysis shows that the global direct subsidy for fossil fuels is around ten times the subsidy for renewables.»

An anti-coal symbol represented the demand for a phase - out of subsidies for fossil fuels.