Sentences with phrase «under the reference scenario»

Under the Reference scenario, overall EU energy demand is estimated to fall by 13 % compared to the control period, though it would increase by 8 % in Southern Europe due to increased demand for cooling.

Not exact matches

The Medicare Board of Trustees, in their annual report to Congress, references an alternative scenario to illustrate the potential understatement of costs under current law.

He references this AMEG nonsense, presents it as valid science (although it is the furthest thing from), grossly exaggerates articles to make a point, and claims utter nonsense (6 °C by 2050, more than 100 % more than any credible institution predicts under any scenario) and never backs up his claims with numbers (especially his feedbacks, apart from the AMEG / methane stuff).

The latest relevant ABARE publication («Economic impact of climate change policy», ABARE Research Report 06 - 7) says that global CO2 emissions in its reference case closely follow those under the IPCC's A2 scenario to 2030 and that the latter scenario assumes a decline in economic growth after that year (pps.

The estimated increase in the global use of electricity between 2000 and 2030 under the IPCCâ $ ™ s B1 scenario is more than twice as great as under the IEA Reference Scenario, and the increase under the IPCCâ $ ™ s A1FI scenario is nearly three times ascenario is more than twice as great as under the IEA Reference Scenario, and the increase under the IPCCâ $ ™ s A1FI scenario is nearly three times aScenario, and the increase under the IPCCâ $ ™ s A1FI scenario is nearly three times ascenario is nearly three times as great.

In practice the growth in emissions is likely to be considerably less than this, because the IEA Reference Scenario does not take account of new policies that are under consideration in many countries.

As global population rises and more people move into cities, global cement production is set to grow by 12 to 23 % by 2050, and despite increasing efficiencies, direct carbon emissions from the cement industry are expected to increase by 4 % globally by 2050 under the IEA Reference Technology Scenario (RTS).

«Plausible» internal climate migration scenarios by 2050 across Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America under three scenarios: the «pessimistic (Reference)» scenario (yellow), the «more inclusive development» scenario (blue) and the «more climate - friendly» scenario (green).

Comparison with the (non 2 °C compliant) EIA AEO Reference case implies that new leases will enter meaningful production in 2031 under a BAU scenario.

These include a conservative scenario, which considers a slower decline in the relative cost of EVs; a reference scenario, which assumes technology costs and performance improve over time across the economy under existing state - level policies and targets; a progressive scenario, which includes a carbon value of $ 15 / ton of carbon dioxide starting in 2020 in the reference scenario; and a transformation scenario, in which the carbon value starts at $ 50 / ton in 2020.

[6] The Energy Information Agency of the US Department of Energy forecasts in their Annual Energy Outlook 2010 that 2020 fossil CO2 emissions in the US will be 3.2 % lower than they were in 2005, this under a reference case (i.e., a business - as - usual scenario) in which the United States does not enact national climate policy.

Bottom: Provided for reference, estimated amount of carbon that would warm the planet approximately 2 °C (Allen et al., 2009; uncertainty estimate in this value discussed in this reference) and estimated total amount of carbon to be released by the year 2100 under business - as - usual scenarios (IPCC, 2007c).

My reference to hubris was made simply to bring under your attention that horror scenario's expect mankind to continue growth at the same rate as ever: Assumptions like that used to be considered pipe dreams.

Many of the 71 conclusions in the «Current Knowledge About Future Impacts» section of the Working Group II Summary for Policymakers are imprecise statements made without reference to the time period under consideration or to a climate scenario under which the conclusions would be true.

The actual cause of concern is rather a scenario in which, because of a prior reference to the ECJ by a lower court, under the CILFIT doctrine a supreme court would no longer be bound by Art. 267 TFUE and could therefore come before the ECtHR for a «second» preliminary opinion.