Sentences with phrase «uniform domain name dispute»

The panel discussed and evaluated current practical considerations in asserting and defending cybersquatting claims, trademark considerations in light of Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy («UDRP») decisions, litigation concerns under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act («ACPA») 1999 amendment to the Lanham Act, and related enforcement and defense approaches, as well as counseling strategies for assisting clients that are operating and staking claims online., Moderator, Trademarks, Domain Names & Cybersquatting, NY State Bar Association, IP Section Trademark Committee, 2016

At WIPO's request, he regularly acts as a panelist under its Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.

He also writes the UDRP Tracker blog, providing analysis of recent domain name disputes under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).

Reflecting on the chasm that that often exists between domain and brand owners over the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, Julius Stobbs from Stobbs IP calls for «a healthy and even - handed debate».

uniform domain name dispute resolution policy WIPO set up the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy in December 1999, which provides a speedy and cost effective dispute resolution procedure.

eResolution was accredited by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and entrusted to apply its Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) to resolve domain name disputes.

While the plaintiff may be correct that this claim is not within the jurisdiction of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy prescribed by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, this court is not convinced that this aspect of the claim should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to rule 21.01 (3)(a).

A standard policy exists for resolving trademark disputes (e.g. cybersquatting) for most registered domain names, namely the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).

For counsel not yet familiar with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, this chapter provides a high - level overview of the policy.

She is also active in trademark prosecution and proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and she has successfully represented clients in arbitration proceedings under ICANN «s (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy to recover infringing domain names.

She negotiates and structures trademark and copyright licenses and assignments; regularly shuts down on - line auctions of infringing goods and false advertising on social media platforms; and resolves domain name disputes through negotiation, federal court litigation, and arbitration under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.

She also has extensive experience in the enforcement of Internet and domain names, through the implementation of strategies ranging from cease and desist letters, Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) complaints, individual website complaint procedures and even trademark litigation under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA).

UDRP Tracker is a blog that tracks recent decisions under the the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).

The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Database provides access to decisions issued in accordance with the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).

Not exact matches

At the moment, this WG is dealing with an overview of the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS), and the next step will be an overview of the traditional Uniform Domain - Name Dispute - Resolution policy (UDRP).

Successfully represented clients in Uniform Domain - Name Dispute - Resolution Policy (UDRP) complaints and other adverse proceedings involving trademarks and copyrights.

Connecticut business litigation lawyer & attorney Neyah Kane Bennett of Aeton Law Partners LLP, offering services for non-compete agreements, breach of contract, interference with contracts, severance packages, home improvement lawsuits, partnership and business disputes, cyber liability, privacy laws, data loss, technology errors, domain name disputes, defamation, slander, trade secrets, non-disclosure agreement, copyright infringement, software licensing, shareholder rights, business fraud, uniform commercial code, serving Hartford, Middletown, Glastonbury, East Hartford, Manchester, Wethersfield, Windsor, South Windsor, New Haven, Waterbury, Meriden, Rocky Hill, Berlin, Enfield, Bloomfield, New Britain, Southington, Bolton, Vernon, Rockville, New London, Milford, Bridgeport, West Hartford and the state of Connecticut.

Domain name disputes, including substantial experience with Uniform Domain - Name Dispute - Resolution Policy (UDRP) proceedings, representing clients before the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center and the ADR Fname disputes, including substantial experience with Uniform Domain - Name Dispute - Resolution Policy (UDRP) proceedings, representing clients before the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center and the ADR FName Dispute - Resolution Policy (UDRP) proceedings, representing clients before the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center and the ADR Forum

It refers to the ICANN Uniform Domain - Name Dispute - Resolution Policy that applies to.

We also have extensive experience in litigation cases under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and handling of domain name arbitrations under the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy.

Muscovitch was the founder and publisher of Domain Name Law Reports - a volunteer organization that helped lawyers research Uniform Domain - Name Dispute - Resolution Policy and cases.

«This finding is consistent with the majority of Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy cases, which have recognized a domain name registration as a trademark owner's exclusive right, and that permitting such a registration would allow any distributor, wholesaler or retailer to monopolize a third party's real trade mark as a domain name based upon the mere fact that it sells the party's products or services,» says Gowlings.