Sentences with phrase «union citizens living»

The Directive quite unambiguously applies only to Union Citizens living in a state other than their own (Article 3).

The executive director of the Britain Stronger in Europe campaign and son of Labour grandee Jack Straw had suggested that European Union citizens living in the UK could be sent back to the country they were born in should Britain vote to leave on June 23.

Not exact matches

Does it count in her favor that a Russian Jewish atheist made heroic (yes, heroic) efforts to leave the Soviet Union and become an American citizen, and that she defended her adopted home for the rest of her life?

Imagine an American citizen who, bankrolled by millions of dollars from the Soviet Union, spent his entire life as an apologist for Communist oppression, including Stalin's murder of many millions by planned famine and the terror of the gulag archipelago.

If every U.S. state had its own «citizens» and tried to tax them regardless of where they lived in the union (or the world) I expect that would be impracticable.

It also means working every day as citizens, as communities as a country to live up to our highest ideals and continue our long march to a more perfect union.»

NY1 and its co-sponsors, WNYC, POLITICO, Citizens Union, Civic Hall, Intelligence Squared, and the Latino Leadership Institute will host the first general election debate Oct. 10, with a live audience at Symphony Space on the Upper West Side.

Earlier this week, Mr Reckless suggested that some EU citizens living in the UK would only be able to stay for a «transitional period» if the UK left the European Union - although he and his party later clarified the comments to say anyone legally in the UK would be able to stay.

Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, in a recent speech on ethics reform to at a Citizens Union forum, says we are living in a «golden age of graft.»

All registered electors (British, Irish, Commonwealth and European Union citizens) living in England and Wales (except London) who were aged 18 or over on Thursday 15 November 2012 were entitled to vote in the PCC elections.

Category: Africa, Asia, Central America, English, English, Environmental Sustainability, Europe, European Union, Gender Equality, global citizenship education, Global Partnership, Mercosur, Middle East, Millennium Development Goals, North America, Oceania, South America, Transversal Studies, Universal Education, Welcome from Director, Your ideas · Tags: Another World is Possible, big history, biomimicry, Climate Change, co-evolution, cosmopolitan, Earth, ecological footprint, Education for Sustainable Development, global citizens, global citizenship, global citizenship education, Global Goals, green economy, International Volunteer Day, life, SDGs, social footprint, sustainable development, Sustainable Development Goals, transdisciplinary, transnational, volunteers

Zachary Herrnstadt is government relations associate for the Wisconsin Farmers Union, a member - driven organization committed to enhancing the quality of life for family farmers, rural communities and all citizens through educational opportunities, cooperative endeavors and civic engagement.

Afact believes that the push for milk from untreated cows is being driven by advocates like Consumers Union and PETA, «who make a profit, living and business by striking fear in citizens,» Mr. Miller said in an e-mail message.

The reason for this is that the UK, even fervent Brexiteers, had always maintained that it had no desire to throw out Union citizens already living in the country, and so very quickly the two sides could agree on a guiding principle: a freezing of the status quo.

There are some difficulties applying Lounes to Brexit: the Union citizen who lives in the UK and acquires a second British passport is no longer in a Member State after Brexit, and so one could argue that the «logic of integration» no longer applies.

The Advocate General was somewhat more dismissive: if the Union citizens had to leave the territory of the EU, it was only because of the deliberate decision of their mother based on «the whims and vagaries of his mother's married life rather than a constraint imposed by the implementation of the national legislation.»

The Court continued that the right of petition as set out in the treaties is a fundamental right which is to be exercised under the conditions laid down in Article 227 TFEU and which constitutes an instrument of citizen participation in the democratic life of the European Union.

Its provisions are intended to protect the rights of UK and EU citizens and «enable the effective exercise of rights derived from union law and based upon past life choices, where those citizens have exercised free movement rights by the specified date».

AARP Foundation Litigation, ACLU of Northern California, ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties, American Association for Justice, Asian Law Caucus, Asian Pacific American Legal Center, California Alliance for Retired Americans, California Employment Lawyers Association, California Foundation for Independent Living Centers, California Labor Federation, California Reinvestment Coalition, California Teamsters, Public Affairs Council, California Women's Law Center, Center for Justice and Democracy, Coalition of Disability Access Professionals, Consumer Action, Consumer Federation of California, Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, Designing Accessible Communities, Disability Rights Advocates, Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, Equal Rights Advocates, Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, Gray Panthers, Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Lawyers» Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area Legal Aid Society, Employment Law Center, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children Mexican, American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, National Center for Youth Law, National Consumer Law Center, National Immigration Law Center, National Senior Citizens Law Center, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, Protection & Advocacy, Inc., Public Advocates, Public Counsel, Public Interest Law Project, Speak Out California, Strengthening Our Lives (LA County Federation), Teamsters Union Local No. 70 Utility, Consumers» Action Network, Western Center on Law & Poverty, Women's Employment Rights Clinic, and the Youth Law Center.

The spouse must have continuously resided in the United States after be coming a n LPR for at least three years immediately preceding the date of filing the naturalization application and must have lived in marital union with his or her citizen spouse for at least those three years.

However, Article 21 (1) TFEU can only be relied on «where the residence of the Union citizen in the host Member State has been sufficiently genuine so as to enable that citizen to create or strengthen family life in that Member State».

The Court argues at paragraph 29 that such an administrative failure can undermine the purpose of the mechanism of the European Citizens Initiative «of encouraging participation by citizens in democratic life and of making the European Union more accessibleCitizens Initiative «of encouraging participation by citizens in democratic life and of making the European Union more accessiblecitizens in democratic life and of making the European Union more accessible.»

«Born and raised in Burlington, Ontario, a citizen of Canada and the European Union, Owen currently lives in Toronto.»

(8) As regards the devastating effects of crime linked to such dealing, the first recital in the preamble to Framework Decision 2004 / 757 / JHA (9) states that illicit drug trafficking poses a threat to health, safety and the quality of life of citizens of the European Union, and to the legal economy, stability and security of the Member States.

Does Article 20 TFEU preclude a third country national from being refused a residence permit because of lack of means of subsistence in a family situation in which his spouse has custody of a child who is a citizen of the Union and the third country national is not the child's parent, does not have custody of the child, and does not live with his spouse or with the child?

42 In the present case, as the Union citizens concerned, both of whom are minors, have never made use of their right of freedom of movement and have always lived in the Member State of which they are nationals, they are not covered by the concept of «beneficiary» within the meaning of Article 3 (1) of Directive 2004/38, so that that directive does not apply either to them or to their family members (Dereci and Others, paragraph 57).

36 The referring court asks whether the fact that the applicant for a residence permit lives together with his spouse, is not the biological father of the child who is a Union citizen, and does not have custody of the child may affect the interpretation to be given to the provisions on citizenship of the Union.

By its question, the national court is asking, in essence, whether acts of sexual abuse of a 14 year old minor, sexual coercion and rape committed within the family constitute imperative grounds of public security which may justify the expulsion of a Union citizen who has lived for more than 10 years on the territory of the host Member State.

67 In paragraph 48 of the judgment in Dereci and Others, the Court took the view that, in so far as the disputes in the main proceedings concerned Union citizens who resided in a Member State and their family members who were third country nationals who wished to enter and reside in that Member State for the purposes of living as a family with those citizens, Directive 2003/86 was not applicable to those third country nationals.

(Citizenship of the Union — Article 20 TFEU − Directive 2003 / 86 / EC − Right to family reunification − Union citizens who are minor children living with their mothers, who are third country nationals, in the territory of the Member State of which the children are nationals — Permanent right of residence in that Member State of the mothers who have been granted sole custody of the Union citizens — Change in composition of the families following the mothers» remarriage to third country nationals and the birth of children of those marriages who are also third country nationals — Applications for family reunification in the Member State of origin of the Union citizens — Refusal of the right of residence to the new spouses on the ground of lack of sufficient resources — Right to respect for family life — Taking into consideration of the children's best interests)

Similarly, British Citizens living within the European Union also want certainty about their respective positions.

The government, in its white paper «The process for withdrawing from the European Union», identified the following prominent examples of areas as being of interest to UK citizens living in the EU so as to have to form the subject of negotiations in the context of agreeing a withdrawal agreement, whether by way of transitional provisions or a permanent new «future relationship» between the EU and the UK:

This service is currently limited to citizens living inside the European Union, as it uses SEPA bank transfers, a service only available to European banks.

To achieve this it proposes policies that ensure a high level of environmental protection in the European Union and that preserve the quality of life of EU citizens.