Upon application for Judicial Review, the High Court found that Ofsted's complaints process was defective because it did not permit a substantive challenge to the most serious criticisms, namely, when a school was found to have serious weaknesses or requiring special measures.
Not exact matches
Cs made their claim and in doing so, relied
upon the commentary in Volume 38 (2) of the Encyclopaedia of Forms & Precedents that states the inclusion of a «call - in» clause should at least be considered in any case other than: «the very simplest cases such as an
application for change of use or
for the carrying out of relatively minor building operations where... it is unlikely that the grant of planning permission would be challenged by third parties by way of
judicial review....»
and the person aggrieved or the Chief Electoral Officer or any elector applies under the
Judicial Review Procedure Act
for an order commanding the returning officer to perform the duty that is shown to have been not performed, the notice of
application shall be served
upon the returning officer and
upon the persons who were candidates at the election.