Sentences with phrase «upside reward potential»

Upside reward potential is strong as the stock has to go over $ 82 / share to trade at a value that implies the company's profits will experience a 0 % decline, a no - growth scenario.

Not exact matches

Pacific Crest's Andy Hargreaves continues to believe there is meaningful upside potential for Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) in the long term, although the risk / reward is «more neutral» at the current valuation levels.

Significant upside potential coupled with CSCO's 3.4 % dividend yield provides investors with an attractive risk / reward opportunity.

Opening new trades at the current levels involves taking on too much risk with minimal upside potential (negative reward - risk ratio).

Large upside potential coupled with SCS» 4 % dividend yield provides investors a low risk / high reward opportunity.

«A startup's ability to issue stock options levels the playing field by giving potential employees something unique: the ability to share in the company's rewards as well as its risks and participate in the upside of a new and exciting venture.»

Significant upside potential coupled with GIS» 3.6 % dividend yield provide investors with an attractive risk / reward opportunity.

NTU assesses equities based on their risk / reward ratio as upside potential needs to always be measured against the downside risk.

This is a nearly 1:5 and 1:8 risk - reward trade, which means that this trade offers nearly 5X to 8X more potential upside than downside.

Yet we believe equities offer a better risk - reward profile than credit given their potential for greater upside in returns and more balanced downside risks.

The upside to using a community bank: the potential for better rewards and interest rates.

Going forward, investors still need to weigh the upside potential for reward against the real risk of financial loss.

And I still prefer European equities: In my opinion, lower corporate margins, cheaper valuations, Europe's position (vs. the US) in the economic cycle, and the ECB's huge & still untapped firepower (vs. that of the Fed), all present a superior risk - reward proposition — in terms of market upside, and in terms of potential restructuring and M&A.

I think that's how things turned out here — a potential risk has now become an actual (& obviously unfair / coercive) risk, but fortunately the original price & upside potential provided ample protection & reward.

For each stock, that's an exercise in assessing upside potential (i.e. current share price vs. your latest estimate of intrinsic value), and then weighing that reward against the level & range of risk (s) involved.

Analogously, we sometimes attribute the so - called Low Volatility Anomaly to behavioral causes; risk - seeking investors prefer to buy exciting stocks for their perceived upside potential, while investors in lower - volatility stocks reap the reward of risk - seekers» undue enthusiasm; figuratively, they are selling lottery tickets.

We attempt to mitigate our investment risk by purchasing stocks where, by our calculation, the potential gain is at least three times the potential loss (an Upside reward - to - Downside risk ratio of 3:1 or greater).

That doesn't mean I simply recommend buying a few of the highest upside potential stocks — high reward often means high risk, and everybody's portfolio & investment approach is different, so what might be suitable for me mightn't be suitable for you.

That's not to suggest upside potential is the final arbiter — high reward stocks are often high risk too.

Because the stock offering the greatest diversification is almost inevitably the stock offering the best risk / reward equation, even if it presents less obvious upside potential than your other buy candidates.

Sure, one of these stocks is worth a bet occasionally, but usually (by comparison) a superior stock / company with just half the upside potential will still offer the better risk / reward proposition...

And looking at the elevated valuations of (far less compelling) income & defensive stocks today, it's not difficult to argue companies who offer genuine long term secular growth (regardless of the economic environment), may actually deliver far superior risk / reward & upside potential from current levels.

That's less than ideal, but since Marriott Rewards points are seldom worth even a cent each on award night redemptions, I don't consider it a great sacrifice given the potential upside of the experiment.

And with Ultimate Rewards you retain the potential of big upside when transferring and redeeming.

This includes an evaluation of the risk parameters relating to outcome and costs on the downside and the potential reward on the upside.

The fact that you're reading this today suggests that you've been looking for a good, honest home business — one that's profitable, yes, but is also rewarding and has unlimited upside potential.