I would, at a minimum,
upvote the answer for now, but I can't due to limited rep.
Even when Trump makes me s *** my pants when he talks, I have to
upvote this answer because what you say sounds coherent.
Like I said, I wanted to
upvote your answer but as it stands it's just too reductionist.
I would
upvote the answer if it weren't for the unnecessary use of «DUH».
I will
upvote all answers which mention «increase supply» on the grounds of them being the only right answers;)
Thanks to everyone because every answer or comment was useful for me and
I upvoted every answer or comment but I accepted the answer given by @Evren Yurtesen because I'm doing what he mentioned in his answer.
But in fact as the answer shows the use of the lights is one of the facts required for the passage through the red signal to be legal in NSW, yet for some reason you have not
upvoted the answer, let alone accepted it.
Not exact matches
Most interesting to us (and the
answer most
upvoted) was his
answer to what the U.S. faced as its greatest threat.
@DrunkCynic But that's not how this (for some reason
upvoted)
answer describes it.
If you left out that sentence, which is more personal opinion than part of the
answer, I think you would get more
upvotes.
I
upvoted most of the other
answers talking about Mixed Economy, but they used a political approach while mostly ignoring the economics, which I think is really the heart of the issue here (since we are talking about how to organize an economy).
What's hilarious is that the «correct»
answer with tons of
upvotes doesn't cite any sources either.
As I said previously in my
answer, I urge you to visit StackOverFlow elections page and see how well implemented
upvote / downvote system is working in practice, for moderator election.
If it really is unrealistically high and you can show that with convincing data, i'd definitely
upvote such an
answer.
Sam I am, people don't write
answers here in order to be
upvoted in the first place.
Users with a total
answer score (total
upvotes minus total downvotes) of 5 or more on the tag, can vote for tag synonyms.
If you agree with an existing
answer, you may just
upvote it.
I'm not sure if I should downvote for incorrectly getting the definition (it's not «waving at»), or
upvote for the videogame origin story (which is as far as I know somewhat correct, bit not relevant enough that I was too lazy to chase it down to include in my own
answer)
This is the only
answer I feel comfortable
upvoting, no matter how much I suspect that higher - voted (but speculative)
answers may be right.
@Philipp Lots of
answers that don't provide sources gets
upvoted all the time.
Your brilliant
answer sheds light upon the unique methods of anti-communist «defensive» propaganda adopted over the years, which can influence public opinion in deep and unexpected ways through popular culture — I appreciate and
upvote!
Since I can't comment or even
upvote here, I'll just copy a part of comment of @CsBalazsHungary as an
answer (if @CsBalazsHungary puts this as an
answer, I'll remove mine): «I have only an opinion, so I post it as a comment: US does support anti-russian actions only to show US is still the strongest country, and when they say stop, everybody will obey.
I would have just closed your
answer if it hadn't had 6
upvotes already.
I don't understand why people
upvote such
answers.
While I'm not surprised that you got a ton of
upvotes on here, this
answer is full of premises that are just wrong.
I
upvoted this for that aspect of the
answer
Users with a total
answer score (total
upvotes minus total downvotes) of 5 or more on the tag, can vote for tag synonyms.
Answer good,
upvote because even if visible damage does not reach the cords they could be weakened.
One item per
answer please,
upvote the best ones.
I've
upvoted everyone, and am accepting Patrick's
answer as the most informative.
The site allows for people to vote on
answers to questions, which ranks the question as an «
upvote» or «downvote.»
I actually
upvoted you given that your
answer is about as good as it can be considering the quality of the question.
Mandatory
upvote of your
answer as I all but came to a similar conclusion as you after some serious surgery on my
answer.
I'm on StackOverflow, Workplace, and SoftwareEngineering mostly to just
upvote the useful
answers (for me, that is).
I can't help but wonder how this ended up on Hot Network Questions with such a low number of views and
upvotes, and a single
answer that essentially says «don't ask this here.»
Users with a total
answer score (total
upvotes minus total downvotes) of 5 or more on the tag, can vote for tag synonyms.
We're sorry that we have to sandbox new users, but the first few
upvotes on your questions or
answers will quickly elevate you out of it!
Users with this privilege and a total
answer score (total
upvotes minus total downvotes) of 5 or more on the tag, can suggest tag synonyms.
Users with a total
answer score (total
upvotes minus total downvotes) of 5 or more on the tag, can vote for tag synonyms.
I
upvoted yours because yours is the correct
answer; however, can you cite to the MRPC or caselaw that states A-C is at the whim of the client.
We're sorry that we have to sandbox new users, but the first few
upvotes on your questions or
answers will quickly elevate you out of it!
Your update really
answers the question, so it would work better as an
answer (can be
upvoted, shows question has an
answer etc.).
Thanks to this reputation system, it doesn't matter if you get a responsive
answer from a person that uses his IRL name, or from a user with a mysterious pseudonym that has the picture of a slice of pie as an avatar... if this user was «
upvoted» thousands of times in forums related to the field of computer programming you are most interested in.
@hellyale: Even without enough rep to
upvote you, as the asker, can do something perhaps better: Click the checkbox to accept the
answer.
Answer upvoted, but I believe your first point is a bit off.
But I don't know of any statute broad enough to include downvoting a question or
answer, on a site people post on knowing that the whole purpose of posting is to allow their posts to be
upvoted and downvoted.
They can also post new feedback posts,
upvote existing feedback and search for posts, along with
answering mini-surveys targeted for the general public.