Sentences with phrase «use of objects as»

Even as his work historically emerges from these traditions — organizing simple structures, the use of objects as integers in a larger series, a simple declarative use of materials — his work also foregrounds aspects of such works that have become lost in the art historical context.

The boxes will be «customised» by Bailey with text works that pertain to the use of objects as supports for lifestyles.

«Use of objects as hunting lures is very rare among animals, being known to date only in captive capuchin monkeys, a few bird species and one insect,» the authors wrote.

Not exact matches

The experiment itself was simple: a hundred and forty - five undergraduate students were given a standard test of creativity known as an «unusual use» task, in which they had two minutes to list as many uses as possible for mundane objects such as toothpicks, bricks, and clothes hangers.

In her research, behavioral and learning scientist Marily Oppezzo tested groups of people as they brainstormed creative uses for everyday objects.

Tom Chi, former head of experience at Google X, used everyday objects such as coat hangers to quickly simulate Glass» augmented reality.

This web of associations develops over time as you use an object (think of how experts recommend that you don't use your bed for nearly anything besides sleep so that your body learns to associate the space with rest and begins to unwind as soon as you lie down).

For example, in a 2012 study conducted by two researchers at the University of California at Santa Barbara, 145 undergraduates were asked to come up with as many uses for daily objects (clothes hangers, bricks, toothbrushes, etc.) as they could in two minutes — a standard exercise to measure creativity.

The study was conducted by researchers at the University of Sydney and examined three groups of students, who were tasked with completing an «alternate uses» test — a common creativity drill wherein subjects are given an object and asked to come up with as many uses for it as they can.

If mold grew as a result of that water damage and then ruined something you owned, you should be able to use your renters policy to have the objects replaced.

I refer to the object of this price appreciation as «land» because it does not represent profit on capital investment as economists use the term.

Not - for - profits can engage in profit - making activities as long as those activities are compatible with the not - for - profit objects of the NFP, and the profits are used exclusively for promoting its stated goals.

But in this case, the system uses a combination of prior maps as well as the lidar, which sends out a signal and gathers data on the range and intensity of objects in its path and around it in order to determine where the vehicle is driving in real time.

Used correctly, as a means of Grace rather than an object of faith, both Sacrament and Bible point beyond themselves to the Ultimate Reality of the Living God.

Amy Mandelker has drawn attention to the term «reverse perspective» as used by Russian Orthodox theologians to describe the unusual dimensions of icon paintings, with the gaze of the viewer drawn to the level of earthly events and yet given a peculiar perspective, as from a heavenly seat, so that people and objects do not have their expected everyday appearance.

C. All information, content, services and software displayed on, transmitted through or used in connection with the Company web site, with the exception of User content as defined herein, including for example, news articles, reviews, directories, guides, text, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips, video, html, source and object code, trademarks, logos, and the like, as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Company, except for those items that are copyrighted and / or owned by their respective businesses or individuals.

In population control, euthanasia, abortion, and eugenics, the human person is treated as an object or product to be used or eliminated according to the purposes of those who have power over others.

With the definition of religion given, Marxism would have to be considered a religion, at least for those who do not use it as a means to some political or economic end, but who find «in the conception of the «dialectic of history» with its inevitability, its total relevance, its impersonal justice - making power, the object of supreme valuation and complete relevance to life....

Already in this sense he recognizes that Jesus» teachings were used by the primitive Church as kerygmatic proclamation of the exalted Lord: «One can hardly object that Jesus» preaching was after all not Christian preaching, on the grounds that Christian preaching proclaims him, but was not proclaimed by him.

Vorhanden, which Heidegger uses of the peculiar mode of being characteristic of inanimate objects, as contrasted with responsible human Dasein, I have translated by «tangible», as in Bultmann the antithesis is not so much between Vorhandensein and Dasein as between the tangible realities of the visible world and eternal realities, very much like the Pauline contrast of kata sarka and kata pneuma.

Ultimately, of course, beauty is a function of experience, but we commonly use the term to refer to objects so structured as to stimulate such experience.

II, p. 241) At the stage of development represented by such an attitude, the value of religion was measured by the control given the devotee over superhuman powers and, so far as prayer was used, its object was to persuade a god to do the bidding of a man.

I object to Stanton Jones» use of the words homosexuality and heterosexuality as equivalent descriptions of different kinds of sexual behavior, because doing so ignores the facts that 1) «heterosexuality» is the result of the allocation of genetic material at conception that determines which reproductive organs people are born with» male or female» and 2) «homosexuality» is sexual action by people who are heterosexual.

too true; you're right, we are holistic people in a holistic world living holistic lives and political theory, religion, ethics, behavior, psychology, these and many others are all so inextricably intertwined with each other that it may be better to think of them as different views of the same object rather than distinct objects that are inter-related (using «object» here, of course, metaphorically)

And I object to anyone trying to claim such and use it as a means of control over others.

Hartshorne is willing to begin with the metaphysical reality of God and other selves (not just as a postulate, but as concrete existences), and then to use inference and imagination to provide an account of their nature and relations — an account which can he more or less adequate to its object, given the limitations of our form of consciousness.

But for a goodly while now I have been wondering why a segment of American Protestantism — partly informed by Tillich — can not grasp the anger of blacks at being used as objects.

But the conceptual characterization of community is an extension of the concrete experience of physical community, just as the common eternal object used to characterize the nexus is derived from the physical feeling of entities - requiring - each - other.

More generally, an event is «a nexus of actual occasions» (Process 73).4 Just as he used his technical term «eternal object» rather than the standard term «universal» (Process 48), so he used his technical term «nexus» rather than the standard term «event.»

By making language use its central object of study contemporary philosophy seems to have committed itself to an even more extreme form of that same anthropocentric orientation that Whitehead saw himself as combating.

We have not provided satisfactory answers to question such as: 1) What caused tons of steel used in WTC buildings to literary turn into dust 2) Why WTC 7, after all it was not hit by any planes 3) what did hit pentagon 4) Why Cheney was commanding NORAD on 911 5) What did hit pentagon 6) Why did cheney ordered complete stand by as the object was approaching pentagon....

Cobb prepares for this analogy early in his book; during his first discussion of societies (p. 41) he uses a molecule as his example of an enduring object.

Again, it is the examples Whitehead uses which seem to be the source of Cobb's confusion: «membership» does not refer to subordinate enduring objects «such as the life of an electron or of a man.»

Quite to the contrary, this view alone allows to non-human existing beings their true «otherness» as something more than the passive objects of our thought categories and the passive tools of our will to use.

For the young girls who are used as sex objects and infected with HIV to die so young, globalization of the market economy is really violence against them.

I do not think the proposition that future possibilities as causal in the present is contestable, though some will object to the use of the word God in relation to the reality of future possibilities and their lure upon the world.

As such, if the religious want it let them put it in one of their churches but DO NOT display it as an object of spiritual significance on government land using public funds in a memorial to commemorate a disastrous attack that affected the lives many, many people who do not share your beliefs in Christ and crosseAs such, if the religious want it let them put it in one of their churches but DO NOT display it as an object of spiritual significance on government land using public funds in a memorial to commemorate a disastrous attack that affected the lives many, many people who do not share your beliefs in Christ and crosseas an object of spiritual significance on government land using public funds in a memorial to commemorate a disastrous attack that affected the lives many, many people who do not share your beliefs in Christ and crosses.

Bullshit is commonly an object of disgust, and thus, to use the term as an expletive is to utter an obscenity.

My cartoon today was inspired by the story of Doug Phillips, a «Christian giant» who is being sued for using his young, beautiful nanny as a sex object.

Tom, it's so absurd that I have to respond every time I read this... and I pulled a page out of his book and copied it so I can paste it every time he does uses this as an argument... I suspect he really objects to the word «marriage» being used.

Broadly, I use it to mean any style of thought that sees events and processes as more fundamental than self - contained entities such as the physical objects we see and touch.

As for the conclusion of Aidan O'Neill QC, that schools will be within their statutory rights to dismiss staff who refuse to use stories or textbooks promoting same - sex marriage and that parents who object to gay marriage being taught to their children will have no right to withdraw their children from lessons, does that sound at all unlikely, given the cases of the Strasbourg four, which were considered by the European Court of Justice in September?

He amusingly quotes an unnamed liberal - minded Catholic bishop who objected to the use of the word «bounty» in new liturgical translations (he could equally have used paschal or consubstantial) as a case in point.

Familial life when at its best is so ordered that the personal quality of others is augmented; they can not be treated as if they were merely objects or things to be used by one person simply to promote that person's own development.

A textbook I use for my introductory poetry classes, the classic Western Wind, defines sentimentality as «emotion in excess of its object.»

We are guilty of using «the poor» as objects or foils sent to teach us about ourselves rather than people in their own right.

Here is the definition of sexual abuse adopted by the bishops: «Sexual abuse includes contacts or interactions between a child and an adult when the child is being used as an object of sexual gratification for the adult.

Naturally, he does not object to the use of such terminology as «body» and «soul,» provided it is remembered that the human body is essentially a vastly complex society of actual occasions and the human soul is the unifying, purposive agency of the body.

From this viewpoint it makes good sense that Whitehead describes the actual entity in categories of subjectivity and thus makes methodic use of the analogy of human subjectivity.34 For actual entities are not to be treated simply from the outside, as objects to which other objects stand as past, simultaneous, or future.

In his exposition of Psalm 90 he even used the daring metaphor that the subject of faith was a mathematical point, so far was he from regarding faith as a subjective experience through which man's understanding of himself is illuminated, and so exclusively should faith be defined in reference to its object, the extra se of the historic Christ.