Sentences with phrase «use of pronouns such»

• Use of pronouns such as I, me, my, we and us • Soft skills such as personable and trustworthy • Objectives that are vague and self - serving, such as «Currently seeking a position in which I can grow and develop...»

The results of the research paper show that the use of pronouns such as «I,» «me,» and «my,» spoken by the spouse, and «you,» and «your,» by the patient, reflect positive marriage quality.

Not exact matches

-- Harassing an employee because of a gender transition, such as by intentionally and persistently failing to use the name and gender pronoun that correspond to the gender identity with which the employee identifies, and which the employee has communicated to management and employees.

Of believers / the godly / the just to whom he is writing, he uses the pronoun «you» (v. 1,3,13) But of the ungodly / the wicked / those who are reserved by God for judgment / the ungodly / etc the writer always designates such by the pronouns «them», «these», «their» and «they» (v. 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11,12,13,14,17,18,19,2021,22) So your theory that the false teachers of verse 1 who bring upon themselves swift destruction / perdition are believers is entirely a fabrication divorced from the contexOf believers / the godly / the just to whom he is writing, he uses the pronoun «you» (v. 1,3,13) But of the ungodly / the wicked / those who are reserved by God for judgment / the ungodly / etc the writer always designates such by the pronouns «them», «these», «their» and «they» (v. 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11,12,13,14,17,18,19,2021,22) So your theory that the false teachers of verse 1 who bring upon themselves swift destruction / perdition are believers is entirely a fabrication divorced from the contexof the ungodly / the wicked / those who are reserved by God for judgment / the ungodly / etc the writer always designates such by the pronouns «them», «these», «their» and «they» (v. 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11,12,13,14,17,18,19,2021,22) So your theory that the false teachers of verse 1 who bring upon themselves swift destruction / perdition are believers is entirely a fabrication divorced from the contexof verse 1 who bring upon themselves swift destruction / perdition are believers is entirely a fabrication divorced from the context!

One such lawyer, C. C. Converse, in 1884 proposed the introduction of a new pronoun, «thon,» formed by combining «that» and «one» Use of this form made sufficient headway to warrant its inclusion in Webster's International Dictionary, second edition, where, apparently, it has quietly died.

Since God transcends any of the categories of human intelligence into which we may try to fit Him, the only question is whether we do less injustice to His majesty by referring to Him in personal pronouns, or by using impersonal abstract nouns, such as «Ground of Being» and «First Cause.»

However, the use of «she» as a pronoun for the Holy Spirit is more than a matter of personal choice; such usage appears to have some theological possibilities, especially if serious attention is given to certain research on early Christian texts, apocryphal as well as canonical.

The reason people's use of pronouns and other function words provides such a window into the mind may stem from their connection to social behavior at a neural level, Pennebaker suggests.

Though we're seldom if ever aware of it, she argues, nuances of people's language — such as their use of personal pronouns, articles or contractions, among many other linguistic choices — provide clues to their mental state or social status.

Pennebaker analyzed the participants» conversations based on their use of pronouns and articles, such as «him,» «the,» «and,» «as» and «be.»

The use of pronouns often seeps into the lessons in a number of different aspects: Subject pronouns are discussed when forming and conjugating sentences in the various tenses, object pronouns are introduced through questions words such as «who» or by a discussion of transitive and intransitive verbs, possessive pronouns and adjectives also get thrown into the mix by discussing the question word «whose», or when pointing out how the possessive adjective modifies the noun.

Some errors are common to ELLs; others are common to anyone using English, such as incorrect use of subject (I, he) and object (me, him) pronouns or subject verb agreement.

I concede that Folland's use of the word, «this,» in the last quoted sentence above, lends itself to interpretation; it's usually preferable to avoid pronouns in such cases.

Notice that the use of personal pronouns such as I, me and my have been avoided.

You can see many mistakes such as improper writing style, use of pronouns, sentence structure and inconsistent verb tense.

Small errors such as the use of first - person pronouns can be a way to get thrown quickly into the «not a fit» category.

Limit the use of articles such as «the,» «an» and «a,» and never use pronouns.

Avoid the use of personal pronouns, such as I and my.