Sentences with phrase «very old science»

Much of the science they are trying to debunk is VERY OLD science, not the updated more accurate sciences, such as their attack on carbon dating... you do realize that we have updated the science well past the AiG website representation of the science, right?

Not exact matches

Well, if it comes down to holy books, the oldest of the scriptures — the Rigveda of India has a take which is very different and much more in accordance with what science is finding:

This destroys not just the foundations of science and everydayliving but also the very heart of the Faith as revealed in both the Old Testament and the New.

They do not know that at this very moment scientific thinkers have abandoned that older mechanical picture of nature and have come to see, even to insist, that science does not exhaustively describe the whole range of experience nor everything in the world of nature.

In challenging the multiple migration model, the new genome data, published online today in Science, suggest that Europeans today are the descendants of a very old, interconnected population of hunter - gatherers that had already spread throughout Europe and much of central and western Asia by 36,000 years ago.

«These are very old fish, imagine these are like your grandmothers and grandfathers,» says Scott Hinch, a salmon ecologist at the U.B.C. who co-authored the Science paper.

Some of my old friends in the sciences are very worried about the biotech companies and how their intrusion into academic science skews the agenda.

In 2006, Dobrzyn learned that the Nencki Institute was running a competition to hire Poland's best young biologists — demonstrating, Dobrzyn says, that it's «one of the very few Polish institutes trying to change this very old - fashioned way that science is organized.»

Braithwaite adds, «small biotech is really fueled by innovation,... so it's very important to be getting experience in techniques that are really the cutting edge of science and not just the old standard techniques.»

Derek did actually leave off some of that that I'm very proud of that I would like to mention, partly because I'm heard by the old giant, is that I founded an organization called Science Debate 2008 which was an organization which was trying to get the presidential candidates to have a debate on science; and we didn't succeed, we got it on to 14 of our member - synthesized queScience Debate 2008 which was an organization which was trying to get the presidential candidates to have a debate on science; and we didn't succeed, we got it on to 14 of our member - synthesized quescience; and we didn't succeed, we got it on to 14 of our member - synthesized questions.

The old real - estate adage about what's really important proved applicable to astrophysics as astronomers used the sharp radio «vision» of the National Science Foundation's Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) to pinpoint the distance to a pulsar.

Location, location, and location: the old real - estate adage about what's really important proved applicable to astrophysics as astronomers used the sharp radio vision of the National Science Foundation's Very Long Baseline Array to pinpoint the distance to a pulsar.

On June 29, 2011, a team of astronomers using the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope and other telescopes around the world announced their detection of ULAS J1120 +0641, which is the oldest known quasar measured thus far with a redshift of z ~ 7.08 and which indicates that its light has taken around 12.9 billion years to reach Earth from just 770 million years after the Big Bang (ESO science release).

Modern science actually seems to support very old - fashioned milk in this case.

A plethora of new and old science supports cholesterol as a very vital substance for creating hormones, producing vitamin D from sunlight, cell walls, and brain and nervous system tissue.

Hello frnds my name is Raj hussain 23 year old from India at this time present in oman working in sattelite company I have copleted diploma in d.n.y.s. (doctory in naturopthy and yog science) and very soon i am going to c..

Dating sites for 18 year olds I was in the sciences which meant very few women.

As in the world of gamification you can never stand still because your product gets old very quickly, we are working now on developing Science games directly in English Language, because it is a subject in the Community of Madrid and other parts of Spain directly taught in that language and that is part of the bilingual curriculum that schools are offering right now.

There's a very old expression in computer science that applies here.

Upon recommendation from our vet, we started Vetri - Science senior vitamin therapy for our 11 year old - her next set of blood work ~ 6 months later showed normal iron levels - our dogs have always been very active so this was the insurance that our Bella wouldn't feel the fatigue or intolerance to our daily exercise and activity!

My daughter is 21 years old and presently studying towards Veterinary Science through UNISA, she love nature very much, during school holidays she used to work (partime) at Pretoria Zoo.

But in no case should a reporter who wishes to portray with accuracy the debates about global warming, present a minority view unbacked by science and promoted by businesses with a small, old dog in a very tough dog fight, as equivalent to hard science from unbiased scientists with no economic interest in anything but getting the facts and predictions right.

Re # 513 (John Mashey): I'm all for social science research (with or without quotation marks), but it seems very likely to me that some of these posters are bright 12 year olds playing games, some are paid provocateurs, and some wouldn't tell you the truth to save their lives (and maybe a couple are sincere and don't know how to use an index or search engine).

How could guys that once put their very lives in the hands of science be so dumb about it as they get old?

Trying to provide a summary statement for science which is less than a decade old and still very much the subject of discussion is foolishness.

There is far wider scope than just the «deleted emails» for the new House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology to revisit the UEA inquiries, as well as the old Committee's very hasty and inconclusive inquiry, and particularly to question the people involved: Acton, Davies, Russell and Oxburgh.

Viewed from 2014, however, that two - year - old Prussian post is very prescient - except in respect of the bit about how «Mann has arranged humiliation for himself and a public discredit to climate science».

So even though this is all old hat for regulars, repeating the discussion occasionally is very important because the primary goal for all of us is the advancement of science and the education of those who have been messed up by our education system.

Here I linked two very recent reports (both less than one month old) from the National Academy of Science (and the Royal Society of England) and the American Association for the Advancement of Science that state clearly what they think about AGW.

Cyclomania is a very old fashioned science — not one that can be all that persuasive.

I know that some climate science / activists aren't «happy» with such mitigants (and often only work on the warming ones rather than the cooling ones), but it's interesting to see how the temperature record is currently reflecting them all being out on the table as we get closer to leaving the lower bound of 95 % confidence on a very expensive climate modeling effort that is hardly very old.

assuming what you say about skeptics changing topic as you describe is accurate, and at this point I do we are talking about data that is less than 200 years old, out of which extraordinary claims are made as to how that data relates to distant past and future trends tough sell assuming that all adjustments to the data are scientifically sound, It is very difficult for me to believe that measurements that have gone through so many iterations can be trusted to.0 and.00 in most other sciences, I doubt they would tough sell (the photo of the thermometer is downright funny) in terms of goal post moving I observe predicted heat being re-branded as «missing» a prediction of no snow re-branded as more snow a warming world re-branded to a «warm, cold, we don't know what to expect» world topped off with suggestions that one who thinks the above has some sort of psychological disorder extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence especially when you are teaching children that their world is endangered

This aspect of science is actually very old hat.

Remember also we are talking about a 1990 paper; anyone relying on a 20 - year - old paper that has not stood up to subsequent follow - up studies is doing very poor science.

Somewhat fortuitously given the long list of special interest groups which Dr Carter has affiliations with, he feels that the standard practice in science of disclosing where funding for research comes from is «a very quaint and old fashioned practice».