While Forbes makes
a valid point by arguing how the subsidized student loan takes into consideration not the job prospects after college, but instead the socio - economic of the student prior to college, they seem to fail to make the whole connection.
But if you think you're making
a valid point by comparing Gibbons against what looks like an entire athletic department complicit in a ongoing, years - deep culture of rape and assault of dozens if not hundreds of people (that goes for all three programs), then you have nothing valid to offer to this discussion.
Not exact matches
I don't understand at which
point you are sending the offer to be signed
by the owner, does the escrow mail it, how does it happen that the verbal contract becomes
valid, at what
point?
While the
points made
by these gentlemen are both
valid and critically important, they fail to take note of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune from prosecution — even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private justice system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden from public view until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.
However the person going
by»...» has a
valid point and you have proven it
by making this as.sumption!
Wright notes that «we need to note carefully that to invoke «the literal meaning of scripture,» hoping thereby to settle a
point by echoing the phraseology of the Reformers, could be
valid only if we meant, not «literal» as opposed to metaphorical, but «literal» (which might include metaphorical if that, arguable, was the original sense) as opposed to the three other medieval senses...»
The problem Brigitte, when you go on these long philosophical journeys, is that you show not the slightest ability to pay attention to (or even comprehend it seems) the very
valid points being made
by all the commenters who have attempted to reason with you.
My
point being that taking a member of the set of all things Jesus never explicitly taught on and positing, if only
by implication, that his silence is an endorsement of that thing is not a
valid foundation for making a sound argument.
You are demonize Islam, and while many of your
points is
valid you conveniently forget the mass murder and suffering done
by western religions (The Dark Ages, the Crusades, forcing people to pay a «fee» to be buried in a consecrated graveyard, on and on and on).
Peter's
point is
valid in the context, but I don't think we can say that just because God is not restricted
by time, this means that God doesn't comprehend time, or that God doesn't care that we struggle with how long His plan takes.
The
point is, rather, that the community of rights can not be overridden
by pursuit of the maximal good and, therefore, teleological ethics can not be
valid.
O'Malley is especially single - minded in eschewing the use of terminology such as «liberal» or «conservative», making the
valid point that such broad groupings were not easily identifiable at the time and were often marked
by a certain fluidity in connection with particular issues.
your
points are solid and
valid... The bible is indeed full of contradictions, and the virtues upheld
by christianity are not unique.
If Bultmann's concern for demythologizing is a
valid one, and if the sole
point at issue is where exactly the line is to be drawn between myth and kerygma, the only way forward is to take certain specific problems of exegesis one
by one.
the
point about who goes to heaven is very
valid and my heart goes out to you over your father... it is not for us to judge... remember that Abraham (first Jew) was saved
by faith and did not know who Jesus (God Incarnate) was (this is in Paul's writings).
You must live
by that Sadly, calling me names don't make it true or any of your now lost
point valid.
Whether or not you find this position, one held for centuries
by countless Christians (church fathers, saints, and regular Christian folk like me), to be
valid, I trust that we can peacefully disagree on theological
points and affirm others like the Triune God (albeit there are differences here as well — Athanasian Creed, anyone?)
You make some
valid points, all of which are made irrelevant
by using the term «retarded».
I understand those who are not as impressed
by his GA, since he was playing in front of Price most of the time, that's a
valid point.
you made a really
valid point and I don't knw why u've been thumbed down
by some people.
But if we win the FA
by defeating Chelsea, then your
point may be a little
valid... It will be interesting to defeat Chelsea in the final as it will make the trophy even bigger and we would have had a proper final as against playing Hull city...
Merson is quite clearly and vocally in the Wenger Out Brigade and if the Frenchman said the sun was going to come up tomorrow I reckon Merson would disagree, but that does not necessarily make any less
valid his
point about the pursuit of Vardy being the wrong move for Arsenal, as reported
by Sky Sports.
I do nt really understand why Kev ia on here as he is always moaning and negative... Midkemma made a
valid point that Sead os a left back / left - sided and was then subject to an onslaught
by Kev Is there no moderation on this site?
I think the second
point here is also
valid,
by the end Jalen goes into «hero» mode and starts attacking the lane and sharing the ball less....
That proposal was supported
by the majority of Football League chairmen, who voted in favour of a
points sanction on the basis that the club emerged from administration without a
valid CVA, despite the fact a
valid CVA was unachieveable.
It seems that, even in this year and at this
point where it feels like we all know we're supposed to respect everyone's right to make different - but - equally -
valid choices, if you're a mother feeding her baby
by any means at all, you're doing something wrong.
So many of you have argued very well for co-sleeping and I think your
points are very
valid and obviously backed up
by a lot of good research and information.
I just want to make the
point that although women stop breastfeeding for many
valid reasons, they shouldn't feel influenced or even harassed
by peer pressure, pop psychology, or especially
by some idiot
pointing or saying «Euwww».
In addition to all of the
valid points made
by other breastfeeding supporters, what was noteworthy to me was that the mothers in the intervention group were taught to supplement their newborns with biologically appropriate feeding volumes consistent with the recommendations of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine.
But these very
valid points are undermined
by her unnecessary finger -
pointing at feminism, which feels more like a tactic to spur book sales rather than an honest assessment of how the movement actually deterred breastfeeding.
@DavidGrinberg -(1) while a
valid ethical
point, this seems like such a rare edge case that in real life it would never affect any decision making
by either side.
By this
point, it is often too late to stop them progressing, even when
valid issues are raised.
Hazel Blears has some very
valid points picked up
by the telegraph.
Jenny Jones, a Green Party politician in London, UK, raises
valid points about how to tackle worsening air pollution
by...
Marilyn Lott makes a
valid point about calling the «Affordable Health Care Act»
by its correct name (Letters, 11 February).
If all one is interested in is perusing a range of
points of view, whether backed up
by valid science or not, it's a reasonable source.
But you make a
valid point — you can still totally get inspiration from others and I always get inspired
by your photos / outfits!
One potentially
valid criticism audiences may have is the runtime of which is exacerbated
by the slow middle
point of the movie.
So if
by unpredictable Guy means ignoring the Academy's perplexing grading system then I believe he is making a
valid point.
And the script cowritten
by Pellington
by Alex Ross Perry makes
valid points about how, after all the physical and material reminders of a life are gone, all you've got left is love.
Kang does, however, make a
valid point in her piece that Ava DuVernay should not be defined
by this movie if critics decide to collectively call it a failure.
A super
valid point, and probably a sentiment shared
by many others.
Counting up one -
by - one is a perfectly
valid entry
point for students who are not ready for chunking.
Rhee and Fornia make a
valid point that not all teachers enter the profession at age 25, and their paper also includes the graph below showing the actual distribution of California teachers
by the age at which they began teaching.
Among the cases deemed
valid, we find suggestive evidence that students taught
by TFA teachers in elementary and middle school were less likely to miss school due to unexcused absences and suspensions (compared to non-TFA teachers in the same school), although
point estimates are very small.
I have read this review several times now and i am having great difficulty locating any
points made
by the reviewer which are
valid criticisms.
He made a
valid point and she completely avoided it
by jumping back to a term she disapproved of.
This is because research is the only thing which makes the
point valid that has been written in assignment
by the student.
Given that many of your
points are being called into question and you are not defending the criticisms with anything resembling logic, I'm not sure that your
points remain
valid by saying «They're
valid» loudly enough.