A Guide To
Valuation Ratios If you don't know your P / E ratio from your Price / Sales ratio, this page is for you.
Not exact matches
Finally, it doesn't matter
if the low P / E
ratio is related to the company or the industry, because a low
valuation simply means the market does not believe in sustainable profit growth.
If one compares WLL (Jan 11 close — $ 47.55) & KOG (Jan 11 close — $ 9.20) on the parameters mentioned in the table below, WLL appears to be an obvious choice due to its lower
valuation and debt / equity
ratio.
If you like this metric, and insist on
valuation based on sales, a more appropriate
ratio would be the enterprise value to sales, as it accounts for debt in the capital structure, as Dan mentioned above.
Well, revenue growth would contribute 4 % annually
if the price / revenue
ratio was to remain at record extremes, but otherwise, we've also got to consider the effect of the change in
valuations.
Let's manually plug that 19.9
ratio into FASTGraphs and see what the
valuation looks like
if that P / E
ratio were used rather than 15.
For example, these
ratios won't be of that much use
if you compare the
valuation ratio of a company in an automobile industry with another company in the banking sector.
The problem
if you use only one
valuation ratio -LSB-...]
Value investors who follow fundamental analysis typically look at both qualitative (business model, governance and target market factors) and quantitative (
ratios and financial statement analysis) aspects of a business to see
if the business is currently out of favor with the market and is really worth much more than its current
valuation.
So,
if Markel's ROE averages 13 % over time, then at 1.3 times book (roughly the current
valuation), Markel currently has a P / E
ratio of just 10.
If you do the thought experiment where
valuations etc. remain identical but (say) someone turns up at the NYSE and drops $ 1.5 T in a helicopter to take MSFT, AAPL, XOM, IBM private then there goes $ 1.5 T from one side of the
ratio.
Therefore, a quick look at forecasts utilizing the normal P / E
ratio as a
valuation reference shows that future returns over the next year or two might not be that exciting
if the 7.4 normal P / E
ratio holds.
I also worry about markets» headline
valuation ratios, which keep marching higher, and question
if they're priced to reflect a growth renaissance, or simply fool's gold.
Also note that I will hedge what I can
if expected 10 - year returns get down to 3 % / year, which corresponds to a
ratio of 42.4 % in stocks, and the 95th percentile of
valuations.
The P / E
ratio of 15 is an extremely important and rational
valuation reference
if you understand the significance of what this metric really means.
If you spent time reviewing the graphs in this article it should now be clear to you how relevant the P / E
ratio of 15 truly is as a
valuation reference.
I believe that
if you spend a little time examining these graphs cognizant of how price reacts in accordance with the P / E
ratio of 15, you will gain incredible insight into how important a
valuation reference it truly is.
If you would like to tilt your asset allocation based on the market
valuation, I recommend researching Shiller's Cyclically Adjusted Price to Earnings
ratio.
the loans made by the scheme (for example, the type, location, proportion of loans in default, types of securities, future loan commitments, maturity profiles, loan - to -
valuation ratios, interest rates and
if the interest is capitalised)
The PEG
Ratio is a
valuation metric for determining
if a company is fairly valued.
Of course, any fan of Buffett already knows this (btw, don't worry, we'll be ignoring more exotic
ratios —
if you're happy with a company's balance sheet, long term underwriting record &
valuation, you're pretty much done!).
You could throw some light on why you do nt regard the often used PE
ratio as good
valuation tool (even
if you use normalized earnings)