Sentences with phrase «value rate regression»

Not exact matches

Averages of appreciation rates for different geographic areas and time periods are calculated using statistical regressions and the index values are derived from these averages

Here is the HSwOptT2 regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates HCTVR versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.373 x +2.9701 plus and minus 0.8 %.

Here is the CLHOptB regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.5436 x +1.6339 plus 4.0 % and minus 2.0 %.

Here is the HLHOptF regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.4663 x +2.3191 plus 1.4 % and minus 0.8 %.

Here is the HLHOptC regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.5772 x +2.0241 plus 3.5 % and minus 1.4 %.

Here is the HLHOptA regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.5546 x +2.1411 plus 3.0 % and minus 1.2 %.

Here is the HLHOptD regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.544 x +2.1606 plus 3.0 % and minus 1.4 %.

Here is the CSwOptT2 regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Constant Terminal Value Rates CTVR versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.3645 x +2.2578 plus 1.2 % and minus 0.8 %.

Here is the HLHOptE regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.557 x +2.1471 plus 2.5 % and minus 1.0 %.

Here is the CLHOptD regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.518 x +1.6456 plus 3.5 % and minus 1.8 %.

Here is the HSwAT2 regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.4437 x +2.4023 plus 1.0 % and minus 0.7 %.

Here is the HLHOptG regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.5018 x +2.2599 plus 2.0 % and minus 0.8 %.

Here is the CLHOptE regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.5355 x +1.6179 plus 2.5 % and minus 1.6 %.

Here is the HLHOptB regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.5703 x +2.1513 plus 3.5 % and minus 1.4 %.

The Value D regression equation is y = 0.2694 x +5.0841 plus 3 and minus 2, where x = 100E10 / P and y = the historical surviving withdrawal rate.

Beauty Master, LLC (Atlanta, GA) Spring 2010 Internal Organizational Consulting • Conducted management / employee interviews and surveys to determine functional health of company • Quantified surveys / interviews by running regression and utilized results as basis for policy changes • Created and implemented new employee evaluation matrices resulting in increased productivity • Developed employee incentive program including bonus plans to build company morale • Strengthened and oversaw leadership development program building employee skill sets and value • Cut company employee turnover rate by 50 % through incentive and development programming • Generated 5 % increase in company sales revenue within 2 months of programming changes