Not exact matches
In the U.S., we generally believe that publicly - held firms are to be managed for «shareholder
value» (technically, the Securities Exchange Commission's Code of Ethics for CEOs only requires the firm to provide full, fair, accurate and timely financial reporting, and to flag any known
conflicts of interest or violations of securities law, but state laws
often impose stricter fiduciary duties on the firm's top managers).
Dewey calls this
value «quality,» but by the term he means neither mathematical nor secondary qualities; he uses the term to refer, first, to the wholeness or deeper reality, in some aspect of the world,
often as that wholeness is presented in a work of art. 24 If this were called the objective locus of quality, the subjective locus would be the emotional intuition of the objective quality; this subjective quality gives the experience itself the unity which makes it that particular experience.25 It is this empirical discernment of quality which provides the substance of the derivative and propositional resolution of the
conflict between the individual and its environment.
Social change
often involves
conflicts and communication problems between various groups, each with its own identity,
values, commitments, goals, and power dynamics.
Unfortunately, however, we are
often not sensitive to the
conflict of
values and remain all too silent.
Conflict resolution scholar Daniel Druckman of George Mason University and Macquarie University, who studies how groups react to heretics and renegades, says that while each group member has a set of
values to consider, groups will
often, over time, come up with a cohesive response to any violation of the norm.
Often values conflict and you may not be able to have it all.
Baker's combination of acute emotional intelligence and raucous,
often bawdy humor sometimes brings to mind Fatih Akin, a German filmmaker of Turkish descent who also likes to set his films (Head - On, The Edge of Heaven, Soul Kitchen) in tough urban areas where
conflicting cultural
value systems meet and clash.
Every society has its own internal system of
values which
often are in
conflict with the universal
values of human rights.
A reverse mortgage loan seems to
conflict with inheritance aims, because
often the reverse mortgage balance matches or even exceeds the
value of the home.
Unfortunately, one opportunity's usually far more attractive than the other... And all too
often, you'll have to evaluate
conflicting merits: a) a great business opportunity, but a poor investing opportunity — the curse of the growth investor, or b) a great investing opportunity, but a poor business opportunity — the downfall of the
value investor.
Confronted with complex issues with high decision stakes, uncertain facts and
values in dispute, scientists may still aim to deliver truth, but
often there are many competing interpretations of the same problem (
conflicting truths), none of which can be refuted given the state of knowledge — so that a consensus can only be an enforced reduction of complexity into single «best of our knowledge» claim.
If one learns nothing else in law school, one should learn that one's claimed ethical
values often directly
conflict with one's own interests.
I realize that, in some circles, «Diversity» is a buzzword representing a narrowly defined set of
values, such that «diveristy» is only achieved through conformity with those
values, the diversity that most Canadians take pride in involves tolerance (if not approval) of a wide variety of,
often conflicting,
values and belief.
Secondly, as a Gottman therapist I see the
value in incremental behavior change («small things
often»), but where is the friendship, emotional connection, mutually respectful management of
conflict, making life dreams come true, and shared meaning in the training of one's partner like an animal in captivity.
Collaborative Law is worth considering if some or all of the following are true for you: (a) you want a civilized, rational resolution of the issues, (b) you would like to keep open the possibility of a viable working relationship with your partner down the road, (c) you and your partner will be raising children together and you want the best working relationship possible, (d) you want to protect your children from the harm associated with litigation between parents, (e) you have ethical or spiritual beliefs that place high
value on taking personal responsibility for handling
conflicts with integrity, (f) you
value control and autonomous decision making and do not want to hand over decisions about restructuring your financial and parenting arrangements to a stranger (a judge), (g) you recognize the restricted and
often unpredictable range of outcomes and «rough justice» generally available in the public court system and want a more creative and individualized range of choices available to you and your spouse or partner for resolving the issues.
Attorney - mediators who exclusively limit their work to mediation
often undergo an important transformation in their
conflict resolution style and
values.
Since issues of interpersonal
conflict, power, control,
values, and ethics are
often more pronounced in relationship therapy than in individual therapy, there has been debate within the profession about the different
values that are implicit in the various theoretical models of therapy and the role of the therapist's own
values in the therapeutic process, and how prospective clients should best go about finding a therapist whose
values and objectives are most consistent with their own.
To make raising children even more confusing, there is a bewildering array of
conflicting information for parents, the media feeds off stories of family drama and distress, and cultural change during the past thirty years has been so extensive that many family
values are
often seen as being old - fashioned or outdated.