Not exact matches
The only thing, as far as I am concerned, that keeps us permanent is our belief in the
value of goodness, and how we translate that into daily action, even across the
boundaries of race, gender, class, and creed... That is real permanence precisely because it does not, as a form of consciousness, submit to dogma that, with the way reality and history simply IS, or plays out, CAN NEVER
give us all the answers...
Boundaries with yourself empower you, ground your feet, create confidence, increase harmony with others and
give you a sense of owning your
values and morals.
I
value and believe strongly in articulating an identity of a teacher educator as an education professional operating in a «third space» as a
boundary spanner working in a territory
given little attention in the scholarly literature.
We are capable of exploiting human behavior, and this is often done in the service of
giving players a good time, we must be conscious of and explicit about setting
boundaries for when the
value proposition of such manipulations begins to skew heavily to the player's disadvantage.
In doing so, they fail to recognize the important distinction between the operational hurricane forecasting problem (a classical initial
value problem) and the
boundary value problem addressed in KT04, where one is concerned with the maximum hurricane intensity that is possible for a
given set of largescale environmental conditions (i.e., a climatological or statistical distribution of maximum intensities).
Whilst I agree, in principle, that there may be statistical properties that can be meaningfully estimated from the complex dynamics of the climate system, if you want to be doing science you need to provide supporting evidence for this, and not just hand - waving about
boundary value problems and
giving inappropriate analogies.
It's also not surprising that an off - the - cuff prediction that the future will look like the past is not a bad way to predict the future, but the models were not
given the benefit of that shortcut, and so what was at issue was their ability to yield reasonable output on the basis of inputted physical principles, initial and
boundary values, parametrizations, and appropriate choice of simplifying assumptions.
The equations for Rossby waves (Calculation of the Meridional Wave Number, Physics of the Parameter, and Calculation of the Amplitudes) show that this can occur if a set of necessary conditions are met: u ¯ > 0 in the midlatitude region; the highest
value of l within the waveguide is in the range of the meridional wave numbers lm dominantly contributing to the external forcing with a
given m, which provides closeness of the k waves to respective m waves not only in terms of the zonal but also the meridional wave numbers, favoring the QRA of the m waves; the total latitudinal width of the waveguide is no less than the characteristic spatial scale of the relevant Airy function (25), which is used as the
boundary condition at its southern and northern
boundaries; and latitudinal distribution of l is sufficiently smooth in the waveguide, and both TPs lie within a midlatitude region of ∼ 25 ° N — 30 ° N and ∼ 65 ° N − 70 ° N, as the necessary condition for the application of quasilinear Wentzel − Kramers − Brillouin (WKB) method (25) when solving the equations for Rossby waves.
In particular, the court noted [at paragraph 29] the established principle that «though discretionary decisions will generally be
given considerable respect, that discretion must be exercised in accordance with the
boundaries imposed in the statute, the principles of the rule of law, the principles of administrative law, the fundamental
values of Canadian society, and the principles of the Charter.»