That's why California is the defendant in
the Vergara tenure case and why New Jersey is the defendant in the Abbott funding cases.
Not exact matches
Education reform groups like StudentsFirstNY and the New Teacher Project say a lawsuit against New York State inspired by the
Vergara case could change local
tenure laws and present a long - awaited opportunity to legally assess long - term sticking points with the unions, such as merit pay and seniority rules.
A California Supreme Court majority declined to hear
Vergara v. California, the
case that challenged teacher
tenure and other job protections for teachers.
But the groundbreaking decision in the
Vergara case makes it clear that early, and effectively irreversible, decisions about teacher
tenure have real costs for students and ultimately all of society.
Also in this issue: six recommendations to fix Detroit's broken school system, three expert opinions on whether high schools should offer two - tiered diplomas, and a piece on the
Vergara v. California
case that considers whether litigation is the best approach to reforming teacher
tenure policies.
She pointed out that the California Teachers Association has racked up three wins since spring, with the appellate court's unanimous ruling to overturn
Vergara, the Supreme Court's decision this week to decline to review the
case and the thwarting of her own bill that would have made changes to teacher
tenure and dismissal procedures.
More on the federal suit filed against Connecticut, backed by Students Matter, the California - based group that recently challenged teacher
tenure in the
Vergara vs. California
case.
The plaintiffs in the
case,
Vergara v. California, argued that the
tenure system for public school teachers in California verges on the absurd, and that those laws disproportionately harm poor and minority students.
Tenure and seniority both have received black eyes of late — due, at least in part, to California's
Vergara case — and have been replaced with the kinder and gentler due process and importance of experience.
The decision, which was enthusiastically endorsed by Education Secretary Arne Duncan, brings a close to the first chapter of the
case,
Vergara v. California, in which a group of student plaintiffs backed by a Silicon Valley millionaire argued that state
tenure laws had deprived them of a decent education by leaving bad teachers in place.
Hence, it would appear that the only hope for burying seniority — and the foul
tenure and dismissal statutes — lies with the
Vergara v. California (Students Matter)
case, which is set for a ruling by early July.
The article summarizes, or I should say celebrates, the
Vergara v. California trial, the
case in which nine public school students (emphasis added as these were not necessarily these students» ideas) challenged California's «ironclad
tenure system,» arguing that their rights to a good education had been violated by state - level job protections making it «too difficult» to fire bad teachers.
Last month, the state Supreme Court refused to take up
Vergara v. California, a landmark
case that challenged teacher
tenure and declared some school employment laws unconstitutional.
The attorneys involved in
Vergara v. California, a landmark
case that challenged teacher
tenure laws, announced Tuesday they have filed a federal lawsuit in Connecticut challenging that state's laws that they say restrict school choice options.
Teacher
tenure laws were ruled unconstitutional Tuesday by a California Supreme Court judge in the
case Vergara v. California, which could have far - reaching effects on education, reports Mel Robbins of CNN.
California attorney Michael Smith of Lozano Smith in Fresno spoke about how the
Vergara v. California court
case has the potential of overturning teacher
tenure in the state.
He also worked for Students Matter, which brought the landmark
Vergara v. California
case that challenged the state's teacher
tenure laws.
The union campaign depicts Brown, who leads a group that has filed a New York State lawsuit modeled on the
Vergara v. California
case that found teacher
tenure laws unconstitutional, as the puppet of former D.C. schools chancellor Michelle Rhee and Brown's husband, GOP policy adviser Dan Senor.
The California Supreme Court will decide this summer whether to take up an appeal by nine students in the historic
Vergara vs. California
case challenging our unusually protective teacher
tenure laws, as well as a seniority - based layoff system that often keeps ineffective teachers in district classrooms while letting more talented but less senior teachers go.
The
case of
Vergara v. California seeks to overturn five laws involving teacher
tenure, dismissals and the last - in, first - out layoff policies.
(1) The
Vergara Decision: This
case pits nine Oakland public school students against the State of California, arguing that (a) granting
tenure after less than two years, (b) retaining teachers during layoffs based on seniority instead of merit, and (c) the near impossibility of dismissing incompetent teachers, is harming California's overall system of public education, and is disproportionately harming public education in low income communities.
If it is successful, the
Vergara case will eliminate some teacher
tenure protections, limit seniority, and diminish collective bargaining rights.
«Plaintiff attorney in the landmark
Vergara case in Twin Cities to talk about teacher
tenure,» Star Tribune, November 14, 2014
In the
Vergara case, bankrolled by Silicon Valley elites, a state judge effectively invalidated California's teacher
tenure rule as violating the civil rights of poor students, who can not have bad teachers jettisoned from their classrooms.
While the final outcome of the
Vergara case remains to be seen, the unions» firm stance against reform could help prompt
tenure opponents to mount an initiative campaign — a routine occurrence in California politics.
By a 4 - 3 vote, a divided court decided not to hear
Vergara vs. California, a
case challenging state
tenure laws.
The criticisms of
tenure rules in both the
Vergara case and today's New York lawsuit come in roughly three buckets.
The request comes after a California Superior Court struck down various teacher
tenure and seniority statutes under that state's constitution and the U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause in the
Vergara v. California
case.
In the landmark
case,
Vergara vs. California, nine student - plaintiffs, are arguing that the California teachers» seniority,
tenure and dismissal laws violate their fundamental, constitutional right to a quality education.
Villaraigosa also fought for teacher
tenure reforms, backing the plaintiffs in the
Vergara case, which challenged the constitutionality of state
tenure and layoff statutes on the grounds that they harmed low - income students.