Not exact matches
[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being
right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be
right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of
radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is
very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?
You are probably
right that
very few of the posters are as
radical as my examples, but the posters I quoted tend to post quite a bit.
In any case, the purpose here is not to study the British
radicals but to describe this American theological tradition and to ask under what conditions it might become part of the
very lively theological discussion going on
right now in this country.
From the
right, Mark Littlewood, head of media for the Lib Dems between 2004 and 2007, says: «The party is in a comfort zone, it talks about risks and radicalism but it isn't
very radical and it isn't
very risky.»
Ireland may have waved goodbye to currency flexibility, but it's one of the
very few countries that still proved willing & able to take the public & private pain of
radical fiscal & competitiveness adjustment, and now it's starting to pay off in spades... [
Right now, Beardy Krugman must be wishing Ireland was wiped off the map!]
If Boltanski and Chiapello's contention is
right — that the challenge to bourgeois security posed by the «artistic» demands of the»60s for
radical liberation and authenticity has proved uniquely compatible with a new phase of capitalism, a capitalism through which individuals are embedded within networks that turn these
very freedoms into competitive mechanisms — then in a
very real way, every creative gesture provides new opportunities for future exploitation.
Beginning in 1979, with the
Radical Faeries, and then also with Robert Bly, whom (like Jeff Koons) some of us may or may not like, there's an attitude
very much like the»50s critique of the man in the gray flannel suit or the white collar worker, of American commercial capitalism as emasculating,
right?
Hansen, K.Anderson of Tyndall, IEA, Potsdam Institute, World Bank, PTC, and many others are predicting
very bad things (global temps from 2 - 6 degrees C above background) by about the end of the century if we don't make
very radical changes
right away.
A few years ago, when I was first launched into becoming the amateur investigator of what's up with whatsupwiththat, and the flood of really well crafted (certainly not done by ignorant people) anonymous emails conveying little known proof of Obama's secret Islamitude, and other lies that would damage Rush Limbaugh's reputation if he were to personally deliver them... Ah Say, Ah Say (Foghorn Leghorn accent) when I was first launched into all that, from reading prodigious comment - storms in many places, including judithcurry.com, but also invading more liberal venues, I concluded what we have here is less a movement for anything, than a massively stroked and stoked «Great Liberal Hating and Baiting Cult», with a
very big self - organizing component, but definitely nourished in all sorts of ways by the folks you can read about in Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the
Radical Right by Jane Meyer (best book yet of its class and I've read many).
The differences between left and
right are unimportant compared to the clash between illiberal
radical Islam and the West - for the entire spectrum of Western opinion is under a common threat, indeed the
very idea of the legitimacy of dissenting opinions is under threat.
Call me a
radical, but when launching a big - budget online game, it doesn't strike me as a
very good idea to risk alienating nearly a quarter of your user base
right out the gate.