Very reasoned analysis complete with specifics about weaknesses and recommendations for improvements.
Not exact matches
Regardless of the difficulty in evaluating it, the bitcoin market obviously enjoys broad participation (we previously noted that Elliott Wave
analysis seems to work
very well with BTC for this
very reason).
So I've been
very concerned about issues of fact - finding, evidence,
analysis, and
reasoned interpretation instead of just speculation.
Best
Analysis: Mike Morrell with «Jesus and Religion's Relationship Status: It's Complicated» «Lots of people are dissing religion these days, but for
very different
reasons.
Based on some rudimentary
analysis IMO a huge
reason for this is his exceptional first step — he seems to just instantly explode of the line the millisecond the ball is snapped, and also seems to accelerate to his top speed
very quickly.
Keep an eye out for more data - related articles here, though; that subject's still
very much on the minds of the digital politics crowd, and for good
reason (i.e., data
analysis helped keep Barack Obama in the White House last year).
7 Excellent
analysis,
very few debates about the welfare state address the
reasons why it was introduced, and IMO, it is key to the future of welfare, as you have identified.
«Their approach of using multiple trial types is
very strong,» says Johns Hopkins psychologist and
reason researcher Justin Halberda, who was not involved in the study but wrote an accompanying
analysis in Science about the new paper.
So, in the final
analysis, there's
very little
reason to believe creatine contributes to baldness.
A major
reason that there are not enough histories,
analyses and reference books about comics is that collecting comics is a
very difficult job, and libraries have not been collecting well enough.
Current market
analysis and
reasoning for taking a trade is
VERY Helpfull!
An
analysis of the data on these dogs later in life — that does not account for the
reasons for neutering and the order of events — could
very well make it look like the early neutered dogs were at higher risk of joint problems.
Maybe in that sense, I am an Empirical Bayesian, but I get
very uncomfortable when I have a Prior that qualitatively changes the conclusions of the
analysis, AND my data are not dominant AND I have no good physics motivated
reason for choosing a prior with
very different characteristics than my data.
There are
very good scientific
reasons for using observational datasets that fill in data sparse regions in many
analyses — I will continue using them — but we should be aware of not only their strengths but also of their weaknesses.
But the fact that some environmentalists question the value of developing Carbon Dioxide Removal («CDR») approaches for this
very reason merits greater
analysis.
That's part of the
reason why folks weren't getting
very far with traditional unwindowed methods of spectral
analysis.
Further, from what I can tell, Dan's evidence makes it quite clear, that there are many ways that «skeptics» are
very much prone to
reasoning that is heavily influence by ideological orientation (as opposed to non-ideologically and objectively dispassionate
analysis of the evidence.
The early scientific reviews suggest a couple of
reasons: firstly, that modelling the climate as an AR (1) process with a single timescale is an over-simplification; secondly, that a similar
analysis in a GCM with a known sensitivity would likely give incorrect results, and finally, that his estimate of the error bars on his calculation are
very optimistic.
But if one worries too much about «circular
reasoning» there is a
very simple technique to avoid it, proposed ten years ago in this
very important paper: H. von Storch, Misuses of statistical
analysis in climate research.
The logical
reasoning value of the LSAT is extremely limited in scope — its focus is on the ability to undertake a logical
reasoning analysis in a
very formulaic way.
The
reason these figures can seem misleading is the
very different bases used for the actuarial
analysis between the accounts (carried out on a best estimate basis) and the valuation of the scheme used for cashflow obligations (carried out on a prudent basis).
Yet, while Garson sees the decision in Alex v. R. as being «confined to the
very specific context of drinking and driving and a
very specific set of provisions,» Welsh believes that if the majority's
reasoning were to be applied elsewhere in criminal law, «it would logically extend, in my view, where you have illegally gained evidence of any type; you wouldn't be dealing with it by way of interpretation of the legislation,» but through a Charter
analysis.
One is that most law professors are
very able at teaching the casuistic (in its original, not pejorative, meaning) process which is legal
analysis (and many other types of logical
analysis) which process, for whatever
reason, the students» undergraduate professors weren't able to adequately explain.
For example, a 2005 survey of members of the Arizona bar asked those practicing lawyers to assess the importance of a variety of skills to the success of an associate at the end of the associate's first year of practice.56 The top two skills — rated by 96 % of those surveyed as «essential» or «
very important» were «[l] egal
analysis and
reasoning» and «written communication.»
«We're assessing the detailed and
very thoughtful
reasons the court has given and we're certainly
very pleased that the court has sustained a finding of a breach of the act, but the remedial
analysis needs careful study,» said Bates.
Bearing in mind that appeals are from the evidence and the judgment, not the
reasons — assuming the
reasons are an adequate explanation of the judge's
analysis — those of you who are litigators (and care to look at what the judge wrote) should look at paras. 54, 60 - 64, 66, of the Smith
reasons and ask yourself this question: assuming the evidence is as the judge wrote, is there a snowflake's chance in a
very warm place of a successful appeal by either side?
This has been identified to be a problem that disproportionately affects Indigenous young people who have
very high levels of mobility, including across state borders, often due to cultural
reasons.6 Of the 917 children who were completely excluded from the
analysis, based on an attendance rate of less than 30 %, 81 % were Indigenous and 45 % had a mother with a maternal alcohol use diagnosis.
One possible
reason for this is that whereas Rowe et al. [11] based their results on
analyses utilizing clinical cut - offs, we examined the temporal relations between ODD and CD dimensionally in a sample that overall did not display
very high symptom levels.