Sentences with phrase «viable arguments do»

Viable arguments don't have to be about numbers.

Not exact matches

They have no viable theory of their own other than «god did it»... an argument from ignorance.

Second, perhaps if you would actually address the posts that have been cut and pasted in response to your arguments with something beyond double talk and hiding behind recitation of scripture that means little to those who do not believe, and actually state viable, well thought out arguments to said posts, then the board could move on to more meaningful discussion.

Trying to speculate some viable argument into existence simply does nt work..

Oh that FFP That part of your argument is a waste of your words as it is no longer FIFA policy to enforce it as it is not in any way viable to do so and would also expose a great deal more of the inherent corruption in the FIFA machinery.

The cornerstone of that argument, and the way Cuomo sees himself as different and potentially more viable than more obvious 2020 prospects like Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Sherrod Brown or even home - state Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand has always been that Cuomo gets done what other politicians — usually legislators — simply talk about.

Oh, and there are many different ways to get iodine in our diets that do not entail the use of refined table salt... so continuing to use table salt for the iodine is not a viable argument.

There are all sorts of reasons to self publish, but I don't feel these are a viable argument to that discussion.

So there is a strong argument to be made for us to start developing CDR technologies today alongside renewable energy technologies, so that if / when we need to start removing carbon from the atmosphere, we have a suite of viable solutions to do so.

Perhaps Hansen's smartest argument, at least for the investor community, is that not only do we need to end coal plants to stop global warming, but coal plants without true carbon capture will not be economically viable in the coming years, as they will ultimately be banned or highly regulated.

In coming to this decision, the Court rejected two of the arguments that can be used to undercut fair dealing exceptions: (a) did the teachers have a viable alternative to using the exception and (b) did their use of the exception unduly damage the copyright holder?

This bolstered the employee's argument that, not only had the doctor ordered her to do something he'd never asked a non-pregnant employee to do, but also he'd ordered her to do something outside the scope of her employment, which raised a viable inference that the doctor acted based upon a discriminatory motive.

If SPFs and other small firms can not do this effectively (apparently on their own admission — or, at least, the SPG's), this does rather support the argument that they are too small to be economically viable and present too great a risk to the public and the reputation of the profession.