Why it Matters: The S&P Low
Volatility index outperformed the S&P 500 by 2 percentage points per year for the 20 - year period ending September 30th, 2011.
Not exact matches
While the S&P 500 Value
Index has slightly
outperformed so far in 2016, amid greater market
volatility, it has woefully lagged behind for much of this market cycle.
That may explain why the MSCI Minimum
Volatility Indexes, which historically outperformed in defensive markets, are now the most popular MSCI factor i
Indexes, which historically
outperformed in defensive markets, are now the most popular MSCI factor
indexesindexes.
Over the past decade lower
volatility stocks in the S&P 500 have
outperformed the
index as a whole.
Working 10 years for Tocqueville Finance, as Fund Manager since 2006, Sebastien delivered from 2008 a robust track record with 5 successive years
outperforming the European
index together with a lower
volatility.
Unlike beta, which simply measures
volatility, alpha measures a portfolio manager's ability to
outperform a market
index.
Coming from a background analysing non-equity funds with much lower
volatility, someone who can
outperform an equity
index with significantly less vol appeals much more than the same outperformance but with greater than
index volatility.
Seeks to
outperform the S&P 500
Index with less
volatility (standard deviation) over a full market cycle by investing in companies that compound earnings and capital and by taking advantage of valuation anomalies.
The fact that the S&P U.S. High Yield Low
Volatility Corporate Bond
Index is located above the straight line linking the investment - grade and high - yield bond sectors demonstrates that the index outperforms the return frontier established by the two bond sec
Index is located above the straight line linking the investment - grade and high - yield bond sectors demonstrates that the
index outperforms the return frontier established by the two bond sec
index outperforms the return frontier established by the two bond sectors.
«NOBL's underlying
index, which contains those S&P 500 companies that have grown their dividends for at least 25 consecutive years, has not only
outperformed the S&P 500, but has done so with lower
volatility.»
In the U.S., our low
volatility indices for large, mid -, and small - cap stocks all
outperformed their benchmarks for 2015 through August 21.
«Indeed, since its inception, NOBL's
index has
outperformed the S&P 500 with lower
volatility.»
Low Beta Tactical 500 Fund will seek to
outperform the S&P 500 with lower
volatility than the
Index.
We looked at data between 1978 and 2014 to find that dividend payers in the S&P 500
Index have historically
outperformed non-dividend payers over the long term and have done so with less
volatility.
For example, equally - weighted
indices outperform and minimum -
volatility underperforms when growth is strengthening.
When economic growth slows, a quality
index will
outperform — but if this is coupled with low inflation then minimum
volatility will
outperform.
The S&P Access Hong Kong Low
Volatility High Dividend
Index and the simple high dividend yield portfolio
outperformed the HSCI in seven and six out of ten of these market cycle phases, respectively.
7 of 10 Largest global equity mutual funds match or
outperform index, Including the # 1 performing Cundill Value Fund and # 2 performing Ivy Foreign Equity Fund — with lower
volatility
MG: Do you have any studies that show that dividend payers as a group
outperform a broad
index with less
volatility, which seems to me is saying you can get more reward without taking on more risk?
An equally - weighted portfolio of the ten biggest companies in Canada
outperformed the
index while producing less
volatility.
Only one out of the five quintiles demonstrated a higher annualized return than the U.S. Aggregate Bond
Index, and none
outperformed the U.S. Aggregate Bond
Index in terms of return per unit of
volatility.
In fact, a recent Fidelity survey found that many investors think
index funds, which attempt to match a market benchmark like the S&P 500 (before fees), are less risky than active funds, which attempt to
outperform a benchmark.1 That may help explain why during 11 weeks of heightened market
volatility in 2015, investors bought
index funds but sold active funds at seven times the average rate during nonvolatile weeks.2
High beta, value factors among the star performers, while low
volatility lags amid heightened appetite for risk The high beta, value and size factors
outperformed the broad - market S&P 500
Index by a sizeable margin during the third quarter, with the S&P 500 High Beta
Index gaining 12.18 % during the three - month period — outpacing all other Read more -LSB-...]
In the Journal of
Index Investing, the author espouses, «Compelling empirical evidence has shown that lower
volatility stocks... have historically
outperformed their higher -
volatility counterparts.»
Therefore, in periods when the S&P 500 performs poorly, we could typically expect both the S&P 500 Low
Volatility Index and the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats to outperform, as both indices are made up of low volatili
Volatility Index and the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats to
outperform, as both
indices are made up of low
volatilityvolatility stocks.
Hedge funds often have a specific benchmark such as a market
index or interest rate they are trying to
outperform, or they may focus on achieving a benchmark return with less
volatility.
During 2017 REITs
outperformed the Russell 2000 Value
Index (9.27 percent vs 7.84 percent) with substantially less
volatility (11.7 percent vs 15.9 percent at the end of December) and an exceptionally low correlation (52 percent at the end of December).