Sentences with phrase «walcot in»

We nearly got Theo Walcot in on goal for the first minute and it seemed that the Gunners were fully focused for this game.

I would go with welbeck in place of ozil and walcot in place of Latstand

seriously i have been watching each and every game of Arsenal, I have been a super supporter of Wenger... now enough is enough... you can see even from the players movement... they are not even interested to attack... just hit the ball here and there... it's really frustrating time... I wonder how Walcot got that huge contract???? Giroud is a way better than Walcot in the middle.....

i don't see any sense in the article apart from promoting england players by the way people on here praise the ox but none realises that his final product ends in the hands of the defenders after exciting us with he runs in to defenders, i don't mean to say he's bad but i'd prefer him in the middle because there he makes runs and shoot on sight other than in the wings where he hardly create a thing... put campbell, Sanchez and walcot in the wings.

I still maintained Wenger should have started him ahead of Walcot in this game.

Am glad he says «goals n assists» otherwise if we could combine him n walcot in to one playerthat would b deadly

we shud hv usd walcot in our previous match its lyk we keep our playrs fit for their international careers they get injuries n their sickbed is ARSENAL!

Let us learn to appreciate what we have, today i was shocked that Neymar had only 13 goals last season, we should accept Giroud and Walcot in reference to how much we bought them, Giroud scores 18 or more goals every season, walcott score like 13 with only a handful of minutes.

I believe that most of this fans do not understand the importance of Walcot in the team.

Time for おk the ox to start with walcot in the opposit.

Not exact matches

Gibbs hasn't got the confidence to pass the ball forward, he gets to pass back to often and is not good at defending Monreal is a class act so we need to add there Ramsey is not a wide player, why Wenger doesn't play his strongest first then make the 2subs in 65 min and Walcot should have started as Ramsey is better in Midfield.

I am tempted to start walcot, but he looks like he is lacking in confidence.

Would have loved to see walcot come in for about 15 - 10 mins (but didn't happen).

He is not what we need, we have started with Alexis and Walcot at the beginning of the season, they did very well both scoring goals but suddenly, we changed the lineup because OG scored goals when brought in as substitute.

Walcot and Sanchez on the flanks, Welbeck in front and Ozil behind.

can walcot fit into any other top team in the world?

I find it disgusting when Wenger get praised even in the face of inadequacy, Wenger lost to barcelona, not those players with his 2substitutions, why he opt for Walcot when he had Joel and d beasty Welbeck is still a mystery to me.

Wilshere should have been brought in to create and add danger, speed to our game, Walcot some more and Giroud if needed... Ozil being supposed to sit apparently... So, it is no referee, but a team as reflecting manager... If owners and Wenger himself do not get a huge container of coffee, we will finish 12 and he will be doing the walk of shame, leave himself remembered as a loser... What they need to do NOW is bring Henry to assist him and do the job, boost, get players focused with winning spirit he has in him... Then wenger can sit all season long, bench himself as he does and watch henry do the running and screaming as other manager dio... Then we will be in top 3, meaning third; there's now way to ctach up the Manchesters and if we do nt wake up now, we will fight for fourth place; the spurs will distance us and fight for second or third.

Beside the issue of Walcot's contract, Wenger loves his midfielders and in fairness to him, when we play Ramsey on the right, we don't have a lot of movement behind the opposition's defence and we are not as fast as we are when playing wWalcot's contract, Wenger loves his midfielders and in fairness to him, when we play Ramsey on the right, we don't have a lot of movement behind the opposition's defence and we are not as fast as we are when playing walcotwalcot.

walcot and wilshere have shown desire to play and well did dey play in their cameos!

«Wenger is giving the striker the self confidence and belief that should help him to start banging more goals in himself» i highly doubt that makes one a goal scorer... otherwise why bring about this question after welbeck has been involved in two goals??? To me walcot is a better option because of his finishing, smart runs, game reading, delivering during big games, good final touch and making it easier for the right back since he keeps defenders in deep in their half therefore, no need for him to be defensive.

So just because Walcot shows some flashes of brilliance in back to back preseason friendlies Wenger all of a sudden believes he is ready to be our top striker competing with Giroud?

i would love to see a mahrez swap with walcot... lemar in... a probably one cm....

Vela is far better than walcot n the ox only that he was never given the time like these 2 in his prefered position (striker) otherwise those few moments he got t in carling cup the boy delivered

I would leave Ox out and bring in lucas, ox can come on for either Walcot or lucas whoever is having a worse game.

walcot is a good player for me.idk why is always in bench.

i think walcot + 30 million pounds will do the trick I predict a mass clean up in summer which will see Arteta, flamini, Rosicky, and a couple of more to go which will free up a lot of wages...

As nice as walcot is, his agent is a pain in the a $ $ when it is contract renewal time.

is it our transfer tactics and poor scouting or just poor management of this players, I just checked squawka's and the goal scoring CHART, the young man has 50 goals in all competition for club and country at just twenty, not to talk of harry kane's chart which is outrageously way high, but the same cant be said of our players like walcot and chamberlain who has been in the club for donkey years without significant improvement, walcot just got 100goals just the other day, something he should have reached a long time ago....

i rate him highly, he is a box to box player but can play as a cover for Ozil and can give a better balance to the team than walcot when he plays in the left wing which is not either his preferred place nor his natural one.

Walcot must surely come in for everton and for all games

everybody is talking about walcot must go or should go but the person in my opinion that needs catching on is wilshere gosh wtf atleast ramsey can score or can hold his position when played out of position.

y did he bring in a player straight from injury and bench walcot who was already gaining?

Yo forget that players like Sanchez and Ox they are very good with the ball but too much dribbles unlike Walcot who can position himself in danger areas with his pass he is always in the neck of the opposition defenders.

he prefers to pay players free salaries coomon wat is walcot still doing in our team spits

When he comes back and gets a couple of games with Wellbeck, Sanchez and Walcot all running around in front of him then we can properly judge his performances.

Would you drop, Ozil yes, Giroud yes Mertisaker yes Gibbs yes because we have replacements for those positions at this time.So who comes in Gabriel Monreal Rosicky Walcot.

Walcot: We all know the deal with Walcot — he's efficient in front of goal.

Yes there is no WC striker but lets have faith atleast till Jan, Alexis has goals in him, im pretty sure welbeck is wanting to prove something and walcot has a better effect on the RW.

but the players am more dissapointed in today has to be campbell, bellerin and walcot..

See we need a good Winger cos walcot faded off in the second half a good CF and a good CB, this thing hurts so much, something you love so dearly isn't giving you any smile at all, United, Liv, city will look at there club and smile, but we!

Walcott is better than that French Thomas Lamar in attack, but here we are trying to sell walcot who scored 19 goals last season and bring a 92 million pound lefty who only knows how to shoot d ball.

walcot was good yesterday... but he needs to do more he is taller than sanchez but sanchez can win the ball in the air more than theo does..

If i was Wenger, I would have sold Walcot to liverpool for 30m and buy pedro from baca to compete with the OX on the wing and fill in for sanchez when he needs to rest... IMO Pedro is a far better and sharper ball player than Walcot and has a better Work ethics.

I will start the Qoc and Ramsey in midfield with Cazorla / Ozil ahead of them, Sanchez and Walcot on the wings.

to be or not to be, lol... I remember that from that squeaky bird in RIO 2, it just goes to show that arsenal players bar sanchez and kos are all cocky lots, making a hell out of temporary form, lem me let u into this big secret, if an arsenal player wants to lose form listen to his media interviews e.g iwobi, giorud, ozil, ramsey, walcot and co..

We really need to sell Walcot n get a hungry winger who can ship in goals.

for example look at ramsey and ox for example if injury had let walcot play some games in the past few years as ramsey and ox i tell you he would be miles off better..

I prefer to give players like Campel and Gnabry more chance than Pod and don't forget that we will have Walcot back and I really don't think Pod can offer us much right now... so yes let him go in Jan

l would bench Walcot instead and strengthen the midfield that will ensure we also have enough ball possession, guys like Xhaka, Carzola and Coq would definitely provide the flair and steel in the midfield.