Sentences with phrase «war and peace by»

Content — Traveling with my on my Kindle are Leadership and Self - Deception: Getting Out of the Box by The Arbinger Institute, War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy, and The Song of Achilles by Madeline Miller.
Apparently so, when the book is War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy.
That section is out in Ebook format: Natasha, Pierre & The Great Comet of 1812 from War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy with a forward by the composer Dave Malloy (PRH / Vintage; OverDrive Sample).
The epic saga War and Peace by Tolstoy is being read online by thousands of Russians in a marathon session.
by Greg Perry, The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, Eye of the Needle by Ken Follett, Point of Impact by Steven Hunter, The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald and War and Peace by Leon Tolstoy.
On her Kindle: War and Peace by Tolstoy, Works of Anton Pavlovich Chekhov from MobileReference and the blogs Opinionated and An -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

The Like function has saved me so much comment - typing over the years that I likely could have written a very quippy, War - and - Peace - length novel by now.»
South Korea and a U.S. - led U.N. force are technically still at war with North Korea and the idea of an official peace deal to change that is not something that can be resolved by the Koreas alone.
North and South Korea have technically still been at war since then, as the cessation of fighting was only enabled by an armistice signed in 1953 rather than a peace agreement.
Through education, art, sports, music, vocational - skills training, medical treatment, and nutritional services, Falling Whistles is giving those affected by the war in Congo the tools and skills they need to stand for peace for years to come.
aka the book written by man to control man... of course it has things that are evil... u can only interpret the word of «god» by what u know around u cuz apparently he speaks like nostradamus so man hears peace and love and changes it to bigotry and war
The root of this approach is Tyerman's conviction that Christianity was a religion of peace that was led to embrace war by the «so - called Church Fathers,» popes, and propagandists.
The In campaign is urging Britain to remain in the European Union, saying it promotes security and peace by uniting countries which were previously at war, encourages economic prosperity through its free trade agreement, and passes laws which protect workers and environment.
The English tradition of religious toleration, which is the source of our legal ideal of the free exercise of religion, arose in the wake of long and bloody religious wars to secure some peace among conflicting sects by keeping individual belief out of the state's reach.
Pope Francis has called for peace in a world marked by war and conflict, «beginning with the beloved and long - suffering land of Syria» and extending to the entire Middle East, the Korean peninsula and parts of Africa affected by «hunger, endemic conflicts and terrorism».
Pope Francis has called for peace in a world marked by war and conflict, «beginning with the beloved... More
Then, partly as a result of the comparative peace and prosperity following World War II, a third billion was added by 1960, a fourth by 1974, the fifth before 1990 and the sixth by 1998.
«At the official press conference that unveiled Caritas in Veritate, Cardinal Mgr Renato Martino, President of the Pontifical Council of Peace and Justice -LSB-...] said that Cold War ideologies «have been replaced by the new ideology of technology,» and that the «arbitrary nature of technology is one of the greatest problems of today's world.»
Satan's goal is making Americans copy Hitler by enforcing war first instead of forgiveness and peace.
The temptation to adopt Satanic means to gain God's ends, to seek peace by making war, to use force to accomplish what can never be accomplished by anything but persuasion and love, is always with us.
Now, faced by a huge debt from the recent French and Indian War, the British determined simultaneously to make a peaceful settlement with the Indians, to keep a large army intact in order to preserve peace, to pay off past debts, and to handle future expenses by a series of colonial taxes.
It will insist that any version of Christian faith that does not grapple with war and peace, human equality, hunger, civil liberties, the hard decisions posed by medical technology, and a host of other social challenges is not a version of faith worth the time of either pulpit or pew.
The Middle East was torn by a lightning war and a bleeding peace.
The teachings of Jesus are not followed by evangelicals because they are in a war like state of mind because of their END TIME CULT persona to wipe out all muslims from Israel when jews and muslims lived in peace among themselves before the creation of the NEOCONS at the signing of the Balfour agreement.
As I have argued in these pages and elsewhere, the «presumption,» by detaching the just war way of thinking from its proper political context» the right use of sovereign public authority toward the end of tranquillitas ordinis, or peace» tends to invert the structure of classic just war analysis and turn it into a thin casuistry, giving priority consideration to necessarily contingent in bello judgments (proportionality of means, discrimination or noncombatant immunity) over what were always understood to be the prior ad bellum questions («prior» in that, inter alia, we can have a greater degree of moral clarity about them).
Execute all christian war mongers and those who support them, as would have to be done for org religion to end, otherwise wchristian warmongers and supporters would have to convert to the Ways of peace as outlined BY JESUS CHIRST!
At the international level, the best and most extensive tests of deterrence theory, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense, offer very little support for the notion that one can attain or maintain peace by preparing for war.
The result is that America is a nation deeply divided between people who are concerned about real - life issues — war and peace, social justice, the health and welfare of people — on one hand, and other people who are concerned, instead, about «values,» by which they mean adherence to ancient taboos, dependence on a magical God, enforcing acceptance of ancient creeds, requiring everyone to believe as they do, and finding safety in raw (though often hidden) social and economic power.
The Jews back then were a Monotheistic Religion during the same Time period and were not persecuted by Roman Diplomacies and yet both denominations of Mono and Pluralistic Religious denominations were in effectualisms living mostly in peace with the exceptions of those Jews who were likened by Barabbas, the Jew who wanted nothing but war with the Roman Empire.
Our selfish isolationism, our refusal to participate in the effort to build a world order of peace and justice through the League of Nations, our aloofness from the World court, our scuttling of the London Economic Conference, our interference with the free flow of goods by high tariffs, our Oriental Exclusion Act, our arming of Japan for her war upon China, are a few of the counts in the indictment which the God and Father of all mankind must bring against us.
Certainly individuals are different than nation states (by this I mean that as individuals our choices are clearer - not that we can not properly discern whether a particular war is or is not necessary - but even then its much much tougher) and matters of war and peace are very much filled with variables men and women as individuals would have an a very difficult task of unwinding to find some acceptable scenario.
Looking at this side of the ambiguity, we see a church in which many first - world Christians of our day could feel comfortable and undisturbed: a church that lives without question or resistance in a state founded on violence and made prosperous by the exploitation of less fortunate nations; a church that accepts various perquisites from that state as its due; a church where changing jobs for the sake of peace and justice is seldom considered; a church that constantly speaks in the language of war; a church given to eloquent invective in its internal disputes and against outside opponents; a church quite sure that God will punish the wicked.
The place of the divine emperor, victorious in war, beneficent in peace, was taken by the ideal figure of the «Son of David,» a wise and powerful king of the old legitimate line.
When foreign affairs, the crushing issues of war and peace in a technologically shrinking, increasingly interdependent world, begin to outweigh internal affairs, and domestic policy becomes largely determined by foreign policy las in the U.S.A. with its Vietnam war today — DWS the democratic process is doomed to be stifled and choked.
Tragically, the only people in John 10 - 11 who want to kill are the religious people who feel threatened by what Jesus is teaching about God: that God is not a God of death and war, but is a God of life and peace.
The High Contracting Parties, in order to promote international cooperation and to achieve international peace and security by the acceptance of obligations not to resort to war... agree to this Covenant of the League of Nations.
Soft just war theory is characterized by seven key components: a strongly articulated horror of war; a strong presumption against war; a skepticism about government claims; the use of just war theory as a tool for citizen discernment and prophetic critique; a pattern of trusting the efficacy of international treaties, multilateral strategies and the perspectives of global peace and human rights groups and the international press; a quite stringent application of just war criteria; and a claim of common ground with Christian pacifists.
Islam is religion of peace with who wants peace but not for those who look for war against it... Besides quoting «A force to be feared» this what would the Israelies say worrying from reactions after 30 years of suppression by this party and president ruling the country... another fear that they will spread their ideology all over Arabia..
It has rarely if ever been at peace within itself, and the wars of the nations it has most deeply influenced have equaled and surpassed in frequency and in destruction those waged by societies dominated by other faiths.
Islam's worldview is defined by those who are in the house of peace i.e. Muslims and those who are in the house of war i.e. non-Muslims.
From the starting point of the revelation of the nature and will of God that has come to man through Christ, she has dealt first with the biblical foundations of Christian ethics followed by their application to specific contemporary problems, including self and society, marriage, economic life, race, the state, war, peace and others.
[If a foreign government is your opponent, then you should first offer justice and peace, but if this is refused then defend yourself by force against force...] And in such a war it is a Christian act and an act of love confidently to kill, rob, and pillage the enemy, and to do everything that can injure him until one has conquered him according to the methods of warand peace, but if this is refused then defend yourself by force against force...] And in such a war it is a Christian act and an act of love confidently to kill, rob, and pillage the enemy, and to do everything that can injure him until one has conquered him according to the methods of warAnd in such a war it is a Christian act and an act of love confidently to kill, rob, and pillage the enemy, and to do everything that can injure him until one has conquered him according to the methods of warand an act of love confidently to kill, rob, and pillage the enemy, and to do everything that can injure him until one has conquered him according to the methods of warand pillage the enemy, and to do everything that can injure him until one has conquered him according to the methods of warand to do everything that can injure him until one has conquered him according to the methods of war.13
The resultant peace is scarred by the enduring poverty that brought the war in the first place, and by the violence all too commonplace in countries where the «cold war» was fought — countries still awash in weapons.
Just some things to think about before you base your life on a message of peace upheld by war and hate, racism and superiority!
But George Kennan (quoted in Christian Attitudes Toward War and Peace, by Roland H. Bainton [Abingdon, 1960], p. 261) has made the classic reply:
Discussing the language of war, Aldous Huxley focused on the word «force»: «The attempt to secure justice, peace and democracy by «force» seems reasonable enough until we realize, first, that this non-committal word stands, in the circumstances of our age, for activities which can hardly fail to result in social chaos; and second, that the consequences of social chaos are injustice, chronic warfare and tyranny» (The Olive Tree [Harper & Row, 1937]-RRB-.
The radicals» war begins by dividing society into the politically chosen and the morally condemned, and ends with the total annihilation of the social enemy, which will usher in a millennium of social peace.
There is no hope for peace and civilization unless the pressures for the earth's limited resources are relieved by responsible social planning; and, conversely, there is no hope for dealing constructively with resources and population as long as war and the fear of war govern the decisions of nations.
Has the Gospel nothing to say about war and peace, about our lives and how our lives are changed by the projects of politicians?
As in another period of crisis General Robert E. Lee said, «This is no time for marriage,» (Quoted by Mrs Roger A. Pryor: Reminiscences of Peace and War, p. 327.)
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z