Sentences with phrase «war and peace on»

«Read War and Peace on a single charge,» or so they said for the original Kindle.

However, word started going around last week about one of the more bizarre changes we've heard of — apparently, in the War and Peace on the Barnes and Noble Nook platform, every instance of the world «kindled» has been replaced with «nookd.»

Daniel Winner, formerly responsible for Vodafone's multimedia division, predicted a multi-device future, with tablets as the principal reading device, but with smartphones occupying a supporting role: an entirely plausible scenario, and one which goes some way to answering those tedious questions as to whether anyone would ever really read the entirety of War and Peace on a smartphone — of course they won't, but if you're reading it already, you might well want to make a start on chapter XXI on your phone while you're waiting for a bus.

Though it's unlikely you'll want to consume War and Peace on your iPhone, having a few e-books on board for a quick read on the train or your lunch break is a great way to pass some time.

As politicians talk about war and peace on a circular table, Wright mounts a camera in the middle, spinning to capture the choreographed dialogue as it moves from man to man around the perimeter.

Imagine storing two copies of War and Peace on an area the size of a pin head.

In 2005 he and his colleagues told a group of undergraduates to read the opening chapters of War and Peace on a computer monitor and then to tap a key whenever they realized they were not thinking about what they were reading.

So don't read War and Peace on Glass.

Not exact matches

North and South Korea made history on Friday and agreed to pursue a peace treaty to end the decades - long war between them that ended in an armistice in 1953.

SEOUL, April 27 (Reuters)- North and South Korea made ambitious promises for peace on Friday, including to formally end the Korean War this year, but made only a vague commitment to «complete denuclearization of the Korean peninsula» without specifics on how that key goal would be achieved.

SEOUL, April 27 - North and South Korea made ambitious promises for peace on Friday, including to formally end the Korean War this year, but made only a vague commitment to «complete denuclearization of the Korean peninsula» without specifics on how that key goal would be achieved.

In 2010, on the war's 50th anniversary, South Korea's then - President Lee Myung - Bak wrote a letter to U.S. vets, saying: «Korea today is a vibrant democracy with a robust economy and we are actively promoting peace and stability around the world... We wish to dedicate these achievements to you.»

What's clear is that the cold war between PR and Wikipedia may be easing slightly, but peace is not yet on the horizon.

Obama also is showing signs he will take a hard line on issues of war and peace.

The nonprofit organization, which uses a commerce - based business model instead of relying on donations, began selling incredibly fashionable metal whistle necklaces to encourage people to become «whistle - blowers for peace» in Congo and raise awareness about the deadly war.

Recently, he's focused on the profit motive as a powerful tool for turning hunger and poverty into sufficiency, war into peace, and catastrophic climate change into planetary balance.

The reason for this is that the nation's ideology had changed where it had once trumpeted the ideas of non-intervention and peace (except, of course, for the people of the South during their heroic attempt at independence) to those that glorified empire and war, largely based on the British model which, ironically, was the system that America seceded from in 1776.

At the historic summit on Friday, the leaders of the two Koreas also made an agreement to declare the end of the 1950 - 1953 Korean War later this year and move from the existing truce to a peace agreement, the Korean Central News Agency said.

THE GLOBE AND MAIL, Toronto: «We Will Totally End War on the Korean Peninsula»: 65 Years Into Armistice, North, South Leaders Promise Peace

Nobel Peace Prize winner Leymah Gbowee kicked off the 2018 Women in the World Summit in New York on Thursday evening with an all - encompassing worldview on how to effect social change, bringing the wisdom she gained from helping to topple a dictator and end a civil war in Liberia to the social movements sweeping the United States today.

The ongoing Syrian civil war, the Iran nuclear crisis and the Middle East peace process will be on the agenda.

Peace to you Reality and Guys for helping me to realize why you dispute religions and not for disbelieving but for knowing that this is not what is reflected on earth towards each other as you saw more hate among them than it is love and more wars among them than it is peace...?!? But surely what we are doing is not the right solution to correct this and to make them do what they should for good deeds causes and not co-nspir-acy cauPeace to you Reality and Guys for helping me to realize why you dispute religions and not for disbelieving but for knowing that this is not what is reflected on earth towards each other as you saw more hate among them than it is love and more wars among them than it is peace...?!? But surely what we are doing is not the right solution to correct this and to make them do what they should for good deeds causes and not co-nspir-acy caupeace...?!? But surely what we are doing is not the right solution to correct this and to make them do what they should for good deeds causes and not co-nspir-acy causes..

When TPers refer to Hitler, the man who burned down the Reichstag and blamed it on Communists, then proceeded to hunt them to extinction in Germany, then declared war on the Soviet Union even though he had a peace treaty with them; when TPers refer to this man as a LIBERAL — why, it boggles the mind.

There is only ONE MESSAGE on earth now that can definitely end the war and all kind of bloody feuds and conflicts within and / or between all Religions and Sects; and here it is for all Peace Loving and Truth Seeking intelligent Humans all over the world now:

Arthur Paul Boers focuses on pastoral leadership; Lillian Daniel offers a moving reflection on liturgy, a congregation's division over a war - resolution debate, and a surprising instance of local church triumphalism; and Eugene McCarraher argues that the church is the political community within which Christians must debate war and peace.

It reshaped Catholic teaching on human rights and made an impassioned call for peace amid the Cold War.

Clergy were scarcely perceived as nondirective listeners as they joined the movements for civil rights and peace, or the war on poverty.

A teaching series on peace that seemed to critique the Iraq War led to disquiet, and numbers dipped again.

The Century publicized its findings, and produced and distributed widely an 80 - page handbook on what should be the shape of the peace at war's end.

He noted particularly «those superb chapters in the second part of the Summa Theologiae on paternal or domestic government, the lawful power of the State or the nation, natural and international law, peace and war, justice and property, laws and the obedience they command, the duty of helping individual citizens in their need and cooperating with all to secure the prosperity of the State, both in the natural and the supernatural order.»

Not immediately, but in due course, we need a clear statement on how we will know that the war is over and a just peace is reasonably secured.

A weapon of war, and just as easily become a weapon of peace depending on whos hand it is placed in!

Besides Sowell, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University, other prominent figures in the black conservative movement are Glenn C. Loury, a professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government; Walter E. Williams, a professor of economics at George Mason University; I A. Parker, president of the Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, Inc.; Robert Woodson, president of the National Association of Neighborhood Enterprises; and Joseph Perkins, editorial writer for the Wall Street Journal.

Rather, it focuses on two other things: the state of mind of the one who authorizes the war and those who fight under that authorization, and the fundamental moral purpose for all uses of force — to achieve the peace that comes only with a justly ordered community.

The result is that America is a nation deeply divided between people who are concerned about real - life issues — war and peace, social justice, the health and welfare of people — on one hand, and other people who are concerned, instead, about «values,» by which they mean adherence to ancient taboos, dependence on a magical God, enforcing acceptance of ancient creeds, requiring everyone to believe as they do, and finding safety in raw (though often hidden) social and economic power.

When society is ordered, or perhaps more correctly we should say disordered, on the basis of a situation in which not only is there starvation as the aftermath of war but millions of people are hungry all their lives, there can be no just and lasting peace.

Looking at this side of the ambiguity, we see a church in which many first - world Christians of our day could feel comfortable and undisturbed: a church that lives without question or resistance in a state founded on violence and made prosperous by the exploitation of less fortunate nations; a church that accepts various perquisites from that state as its due; a church where changing jobs for the sake of peace and justice is seldom considered; a church that constantly speaks in the language of war; a church given to eloquent invective in its internal disputes and against outside opponents; a church quite sure that God will punish the wicked.

For our ethical considerations on peace, peace - ministry, conflict resolution, Christians may profit from reading the Old Testament, our Holy Scripture, as a witness to the experience of a people in war and peace with other nations and as a reflection on what peace requires of the community.

9 As we might put it, he will carry out a program of disarmament and, instead of declaring war on the Gentiles, or «putting them to flight with his threats,» he will make overtures of peace to them.

Monsignor McElroy thinks it is the latter, supporting his conclusion «that a presumption against war lies at the very center of Catholic thinking on war and peace.»

Msgr. Robert McElroy writes in America («Why We Must Withdraw from Iraq») that «the popes of the contemporary era have unequivocally taught that a presumption against war lies at the very center of Catholic thinking on war and peace.»

On one side would be all evidences of the war: conscientious chronicling of its main events — especially where religion had a bearing — coupled with articles and editorials on issues of war and peacOn one side would be all evidences of the war: conscientious chronicling of its main events — especially where religion had a bearing — coupled with articles and editorials on issues of war and peacon issues of war and peace.

Take a look at ten issues from that first year or two and you'll find essays on religious freedom, war and peace, marriage and family, philosophical materialism, literary figures, and theological movements.

Your difficulty is that you want to try to live in history without sinning... our effort to set up the Kingdom of God on earth ends in a perverse preference for tyranny, simply because the peace of tyranny means, at least, the absence of war (Love and Justice [Westminster, 1957]-RRB-.

Reinhold Niebuhr's Moral Man and Immoral Society14 was a very sophisticated development of this thesis, which had devastating effects on the post — World War I peace movement in the United States and was widely used to justify U.S. participation in World War II.

Here I am advocating a canonical approach on a practical basis: if we want a «level playing field» in debates about the Bible and war and peace, we need to start with a common definition of what constitutes the Bible, what can be quoted in the argument.

There is ambiguity regarding war and peace in the prophets of the Old Testament, but they give a high value on shalom, and Yahweh is the Giver of that shalom.

(Deuteronomy 7:2 - 3) Similar instructions appear in subsequent texts and they are clear that not only are the Israelites to make total war on the inhabitants, but they are also prohibited from entering into any sort of peace treaty with any group.

A sizeable section of people also stated that we are a peace - loving people and unilaterally a war was declared on us out of sheer malice.

Every country that in recent years has moved toward democracy and peace first suffered large - scale assaults on human dignity from dictatorship or civil war: genocide, massacres, torture, rape, maiming, abduction of children, illegal detention, the destruction of homes and livelihoods.