John Eppstein, writing The Catholic
Tradition of the Law of Nations between the World
Wars,
argues that proportionality and last resort are to be found in the arguments of the Neoscholastics, but the texts he cites do not clearly make the case.
Against this revisionist
tradition, an essay by Michael Kimmelman, chief art critic of The New York Times, called Revisiting the Revisionists: The Modern, Its Critics and the Cold
War,
argues that much of this information (as well as the revisionists» interpretation of it) concerning what was happening on the American art scene during the 1940s and 50s is flatly false, or at best (contrary to the revisionists» avowed historiographic principles) decontextualized.