Sentences with phrase «warm anomalies increased»

Warm anomalies increased into spring (Fig. 1) resulting in numerous regional records for average daily minimum and maximum.

Not exact matches

And a third found that climate - induced sea - surface temperature anomalies over the northeast Pacific were driving storms (and moisture) away from California, but the warming also caused increased humidity — two competing factors that may produce no net effect.

«If you can eat or wear it, invest in it»... Long term 3 factors might drive food prices up instead: 1) Global warming and weather anomalies; 2) 9 billion people in the planet by 2050 (and then more); 3) Increasing role of biomasses in the renewable energy sector.

Accompanying this increase in tropical cyclone numbers is a marked SST warming to unprecedented anomaly levels exceeding +0.7 C.

While periods of increased and decreased warming exist over the 132 - year period, the linear rate is still ~ 0.6 C / century, and the most recent monthly GISS values fall right on the linear trend (the linear trend value for the Feb. 2012 temperature anomaly is +0.38 C, while the last two months have been +0.35 and +0.40 C.)

Much of the recent sea ice loss is attributed to warmer sea surface temperatures with southerly wind anomalies a contributing cause [Francis and Hunter, 2007; Sorteberg and Kvingedal, 2006], with thermodynamic coupling leading to associated increases in atmospheric moisture.»

Anthropogenic global warming (AGW), a recent warming of the Earth's lower atmosphere as evidenced by the global mean temperature anomaly trend [11], is BELIEVED to be the result of an «enhanced greenhouse effect» mainly due to human - produced increased concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere [12] and changes in the use of land [13].

Since 1850, CO2 levels rose, as did the «globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly» (for what it's worth), but nobody knows whether or not the increase in CO2 had anything whatsoever to do with the warming.

Very warm springs have been anomalies, but this new analysis of climate model data shows an increased frequency to nearly one in every three years by the end of this century.

The magnitude of the Younger Dryas climate anomaly (cooler / drier) increases with latitude in the Northern Hemisphere, with an opposite pattern (warmer / wetter) in the Southern Hemisphere reflecting a general bipolar seesaw climate response.

At interannual time scales, a warming of the equatorial Atlantic and Pacific / Indian Oceans results in rainfall reduction over the Sahel, and positive SST anomalies over the Mediterranean Sea tend to be associated with increased rainfall.

Conversely as we «know» that temperatures are warming, if a step increase in warming occurred, it would be less likely to be thought of as an anomaly, so would not be adjusted.

You have to be aware that James Hansen's understanding of what global warming is, is much broader than this was just all about some increase in the global surface temperature anomaly.

Increased southern East Asian summer monsoon (SEASM) precipitation is related to warm WNP SST anomalies which create a weaker WNP anticyclone.

Well, ANU, snarky though you may be, you raise a nominally interesting point; the problem, however, is that the amounts are anomalies; so the 90's are on average a certain amount above the average of the base period; now to compare the increase in anomalies in the noughties, which are higher than the nineties and say this is evidence of progressive warming, hottest ever, or whatever is the current alarmist catch - cry, ignores the fact that the true measure of the warming is not the absolute anomalies but their difference; that is the amounts for the noughties should have the amounts for the nineties subtracted from them and then compared with the nineties after they have the eighties subtracted from them.

The warm anomalies in June lasted throughout the entire month (increases in monthly mean temperature of up to 6 to 7 °C), but July was only slightly warmer than on average (+1 to +3 °C), and the highest anomalies were reached between 1st and 13th August (+7 °C)(Fink et al., 2004).

Synoptic conditions with the positive phase tend to consist of increased southerly flow and warm air advection into Alaska during the winter, resulting in positive temperature anomalies.

Synoptic conditions with the positive phase tend to consist of increased southerly flow and warm air advection into Alaska during the winter, resulting in positive temperature anomalies...... http://akclimate.org/ClimTrends/Change/TempChange.html

I'm very convinced that the physical process of global warming is continuing, which appears as a statistically significant increase of the global surface and tropospheric temperature anomaly over a time scale of about 20 years and longer and also as trends in other climate variables (e.g., global ocean heat content increase, Arctic and Antarctic ice decrease, mountain glacier decrease on average and others), and I don't see any scientific evidence according to which this trend has been broken, recently.

The period of increased warming from 1987 to 1997 loosely coincided with the divergence of the global average temperature anomalies over land, which are derived from observation station recordings, and the global average anomalies in sea surface temperatures.

If you were saying that the central and eastern tropical Pacific SST anomalies warm during an El Nino event because of an increase in downward shortwave radiation, you are wrong, John.

Anthropogenic global warming (AGW), a recent warming of the Earth's lower atmosphere as evidenced by the global mean temperature anomaly trend [9], is believed to be the result of an «enhanced greenhouse effect» mainly due to human - produced increased concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere [10] and changes in the use of land [11]..

If the anomaly decreases by 0.5 c in the tropics and increases by the same amount at the poles is it right that the data sets would show no change in «global warming»?

1) Latitudinal temperature anomaly paradox (Strike 1) The latitudinal temperature anomaly paradox is the fact that the latitudinal pattern of warming in the last 50 years does match the pattern of warming that would occur if the recent increase in planetary temperature was caused by the CO2 mechanism.

While it is tempting to attribute the unexplained sea ice trends to other factors such as increased upwelling of relatively warm circumpolar deepwater (Thoma et al. 2008), an intensification of the hydrological cycle and increased ocean stratification (Liu and Curry 2010), or eastward propagation of sea ice anomalies (Holland et al. 2005), the observed northerly wind trends (Fig. 5a) are qualitatively consistent with the decrease in sea ice in the 30 ° W — 60 ° W sector.

Could it not also be possible that they are saying that if the remaining stations have an exisiting or increasing UHI effect and or an exisiting true warming relative to other regions, then those anomalys, legitmate or not, would show a warming, then the anomaly estimates from those stations transposed to the no longer used rural stations could artificialy raise that anomaly as well?

This increase implies a transition to a permanent condition of ∼ 100 % risk that any negative — or extremely negative — 12 - mo precipitation anomaly is also extremely warm.

In contrast, statewide warming (Fig. 1C) has led to a substantial increase in warm conditions, with 80 % of years in 1995 — 2014 exhibiting a positive temperature anomaly (Fig. 2B), compared with 45 % of years in 1896 — 2014 (Fig. 2A).

However, the occurrence of warm years (including +1.5 SD temperature anomalies) increases after ∼ 1980, reaching 1.0 by ∼ 2030.

The probability that a negative precipitation anomaly co-occurs with a positive temperature anomaly has increased recently, with warm — dry years occurring more than twice as often in the past two decades (91 %) as in the preceding century (42 %)(Fig. 1B).

The warming (WV is a ghg) is welcome (countering the average global cooling which would otherwise be occurring as a result of declining net effect of ocean cycles and a declining proxy which is the time - integral of SSN anomalies) but the added WV increases the risk of precipitation related flooding.

''... [the] extreme anomalies... were a consequence of global warming...» «Global warming causes spring warmth to come earlier...»»... this level of average warming is already having important effects»»... the dice loading is an expected effect of global warming»»... warming may cause snowfall to increase...»»... recent global warming, with high probability, is responsible for recent extreme anomalies»

The correlation between CO2 levels and anomalies is statistically significant, but that shouldn't be a surprise considering there's a statistically significant warming trend over time and CO2 levels have been increasing smoothly year on year.

The global temperature anomaly certainly shows an increase since systematic thermometer records began in the tail end of the period of extreme cold known as the «little ice age», but just as in the medieval warming period, local temperature series need not correspond to the global trend.

Over the last month or so warm sea - surface temperature [SST] and upper - ocean heat content anomalies have increased in the near - equatorial central Pacific, while the SST cool tongue in the near - equatorial far - eastern Pacific has weakened, with warm anomalies now evident there.

The increase, by more than a factor 10, of area covered by extreme hot summer anomalies (> +3 σ) reflects the shift of the anomaly distribution in the past 30 y of global warming, as shown succinctly in Fig. 4.

[2] The Historical simulations have an average temperature anomaly of 0.84 °C for 1996 — 2005 relative to 1850, whereas HadCRUT4v4 shows an increase of 0.73 °C from 1850 — 1859 to 1996 — 2005, and Figure 7 of Miller et al. 2014 shows consistently greater warming for GISS - E2 - R than per GISTEMP since 2000.

The increase of these extreme anomalies, by more than an order of magnitude, implies that we can say with a high degree of confidence that events such as the extreme summer heat in the Moscow region in 2010 and Texas in 2011 were a consequence of global warming.

There is a laundry list of possible or observed impacts, from the return of the megadroughts western North America experienced during the Medieval Climate Anomaly, to the continuation of the already observed «death spiral» of the Arctic sea ice, with its implications for Northern hemisphere weather and increased warming of the whole planet.

If CO2 is monotonically increasing, and solar activity isn't playing any role, then, shouldn't this El Nino anomaly have been significantly warmer than the one in 1998?