Sentences with phrase «warming alarmists use»

I documented this pattern in a book published one year ago this month, subtly titled «Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud and Deception to Keep You Misinformed.»

Mr. Horner, the author of «Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed,» noted that he had proudly quoted Greenpeace calling him a «climate criminal» on the cover of that book, published in 2008.

Horner outlines the details in his 2008 book Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmist Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep you Misinformed.

Not exact matches

However, when people use the term «catastrophic anthropogenic global warming» they are not referring to any real science but are attempting to paint anyone who talks about the science as an alarmist.

... The global warming alarmists could not pursist without their endless use of fear, scare and dire predictions; most of which are based on faulty computer programs.

We the citizens (including all you global warming alarmists) can continue using one of the greatest life - enhancing resources ever discovered.

So I take it that the consensus view is that according to our best current scientific understanding, there is no possibility whatsoever of any catastrophic consequences of anthropogenic global warming; therefore to use the word «catastrophic» is irresponsible alarmism;, and therefore the deniers are actually quite right to accuse anyone who suggests that such outcomes are possible of being an irresponsible alarmist.

He withdrew any kind of bipartisan support for an ETS (and more)» «two years ago Canadians gave majority government to Stephen Harper's Conservatives, who were pledged to a sensible use of its resources, so Australians have now elected a government with a pragmatic attitude on global warming» «Led by Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, an attempt was made, by what can only be described as alarmists, to exploit these fires for the purposes of the global warming debate.

In other words, this Tex86 proxy (which is being used very extensively in the warming alarmist literature now and is showing more warming in the past for example as a result of small changes in CO2), needs a lot more work in calibration and is probably mis - calibrated.

«I've seen Al Gore's film twice, but I've also read Michael Crichton's State of Fear, which makes a compelling case on the other side,» says Hug, referring to the controversial 2004 novel in which Crichton — using scientific arguments that were hotly challenged by critics — ridiculed the global - warming consensus as the work of conspiratorial alarmists.

Whether or not there is evidence to support Trenberth's idea, the idea itself violates the fundamental assumption of all Alarmists, namely, that climate science is correct to use a «radiation - only» theory of warming.

«We should be growing more trees and using more wood,» says Moore, but the global warming alarmists refer to the forests as «carbon stocks» that must not be used.

The climate alarmists have exploited the public's understandable lack of knowledge concerning climate science to argue that the developed countries (but usually not less developed countries) should give up some or preferably all fossil fuel use in order to avoid alleged catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW).

NCSE isn't composed of scientists or science teachers; it's an activist group devoted, in part, to expounding global warming alarmists» dogma: Humans are causing climate change; the results will be catastrophic; and governments must force people to use less energy and live simpler to prevent future disasters.

As such, alarmists aren't just questioning the value of continuing the global warming debate; their approach also calls into question the scientific method, which has been used successfully in its current form since the Enlightenment.

'' Global warming alarmists are the equivalent of the flat - Earthers... you know it used to be it is accepted scientific wisdom the Earth is flat, and this heretic named Galileo was branded a denier,»

Don't get me wrong, I don't buy into the AGW alarmist story that we are anywhere near a tipping point or even that human CO2 and land use activities are responsible for most of the warming we have experienced in the past 150 years.

While global warming alarmists continue to fantasize crude oil use getting drastically reduced already starting next year, OPEC sees it totally differently.

«To Gavin [Schmidt] and the other alarmists, it appears, a piece that is fair and balanced can make no mention of any other opinion except that carbon dioxide is causing global warming and action is needed now and will deliver gain and no pain, something the one sided media coverage has gotten them used to over the years,» D'Aleo wrote on January 13, 2009.

Looking for any evidence that humanity is cooking the globe, Jiansong Zhou and Ka - Kit Tung (Deducing Multi-decadal Anthropogenic Global Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression Analysis) began by excluding climate change due to natural factors and more specifically, by adding the effects of AMO (Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation) trends that alarmists neglected to consider.

It is true that global warming alarmists are filing multiple lawsuits to use the Clean Air Act and the Endangered Species Act to cause a regulatory trainwreck...

The Green Policy Fairness Coalition already cites efforts by global warming alarmists to use lawsuits against the federal and state governments bypass the legislative process.

Even using the climate alarmists» figures the warming in the late 20th century was no more rapid than earlier in the century, at times when CO2 emissions were far lower.

Imagine the uproar if the phrase «global warming denier» made its way into a textbook for students, as the term «global warming alarmist», used to describe rather mainstream scientific views, is prevalent in Rapp's silly book.

Now alarmists use summer 2012 melt to bolster their failed anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis.

After becoming fed up with the childish and dangerous tactics of alarmists, particularly the use of the term «climate denier,» Spencer said that the «global - warming Nazis» were in fact threatening millions of lives — especially among the poor — with their «pseudo-scientific ramblings» and support for fascist - style «radical policies» supposedly aimed at combating «global warming.»

Who among hot climatists will want to commit to writing a desire to collaborate in figuring out a way to discredit the more accurate satellite data that shows no global warming going on 2 decades in preference to greater reliance on the use of massaged land - based temperature records that support the global warming alarmists» meme that free enterprise capitalism is destroying the Earth?