Thereafter, in my third article, Official: Satellite Failure Means Decade of Global
Warming Data Doubtful we saw the smoking gun evidence of a cover up after examining the offending satellite's AVHRR Subsystem Summary.
Not exact matches
It looks to me like the
data themselves are an improvement, but the interpretation of what they mean are
doubtful, in particular regarding a) the UHI impact on the record and b) the attribution of the observed
warming to GHG emissions.