Sentences with phrase «warming heats debate»

Hello I like your post «Ice From Ancient Global Warming Heats Debate» so well that I like to ask you whether I should translate into German and linking back.

Not exact matches

Over the years there has been a heated debate among mothers as to whether a wipe warmer is necessary or not.

If the question is about climate, as was the case in the Biden - Palin debate, one can only presume that the «clean» refers to capturing and storing carbon dioxide, the main heat - trapping emission linked to recent warming.

While not a scientist, I clearly understand that fossil fuels emits greenhouse gases, though the degree of warming are obviously open for heated debate and frankly, a lot of not so friendly jabs on this and other sites.

Back in ’88 there was still quite a debate about whether the world was in fact warming or whether the temperature record had been contaminated by the urban heat island effect of cities springing up around former rural weather stations.

And so this seemingly wonky but economically high - stakes debate over how to accurately measure global warming is likely to heat up much more.

On the bottom quarter, a blurb read, «[t] he Issue of global warming has given rise to a heated debate.

But scientists and officials involved in the intensifying international debate on how to deal with global warming say it has taken the United States far too long to put the issue front and center, particularly because this country is the biggest source of heat - trapping gases, and because the spread of American - style consumerism to developing nations is likely to create the biggest source of the gases in the next century.

His reference to the oceans» role as a sink for CO2 and heat is significant in the present debate about the apparent slight slow - down in the pace of atmospheric warming and the likelihood that the heat is going into the oceans instead.

This strategy could help policy makers overcome a fundamental conflict in the debate over global warming: carbon dioxide, the main heat - trapping gas in the air, is an unavoidable byproduct of burning fossil fuels like coal and oil — and combustion of fossil fuels is the foundation of industrial societies.

It's very clear (thanks to Steve M, Willis etc) that there are issues with both but given the current hyped claim by the «warmers» that the past effects of man - caused global warming have largely been masked by the warming of the oceans and that unless we reduce CO2 emissions now that we won't be able to mitigate future global warming when this «stored heat» eventually comes back out of the oceans and leads to catastrophic effects, I'm very interested in getting to the punchline of this debate on SSTs.

THERE is little grey area or middle - ground in often heated debates, with the CAGW camp blaming the burning of fossil fuels, namely coal, not only for a > 1 degree celsius warming of the atmosphere since 1850, but on literally anything and everything that moves, shifts, spins or tilts upon contact with colourless, odourless, tasteless, non-reactive, trace gas and plant food carbon dioxide!

The rather heated debates we have had about the likely economic and social damage of carbon emissions have been based on that idea that there is something like a scientific consensus about the range of warming we can expect.

While there is overwhelming scientific consensus that heat - trapping gases released by burning fossil fuels are warming the planet (in particular at the poles), the debate shows there is still a fracas over the finer ways in which Earth's climate will change.

If the public saw scientists from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) engaged in heated debate with skeptic climate scientists, it would be deadly to the notion of catastrophic man - caused global warming.

It seems that the individual that wrote this paper was: «Of loaded dice and heated arguments: Putting the Hansen — Michaels global warming debate in context» social epistemology, 2000, vol.

Why Warmists Hate Debate: Flashback 2007: Scientific Smackdown: Skeptics Voted The Clear Winners Against Global Warming Believers in Heated NYC Debate — NASA & RealClimate.org's Gavin Schmidt appeared so demoralized that he mused that debates equally split between believers of a climate «crisis» and scientific skeptics are probably not «worthwhile» to ever agree to again

Flashback 2007: Scientific Smackdown: Skeptics Voted The Clear Winners Against Global Warming Believers in Heated NYC Debate — NASA's Gavin Schmidt appeared so demoralized that he mused that debates equally split between believers of a climate «crisis» and scientific skeptics are probably not «worthwhile» to ever agree to again - Schmidt on his teams debate loss: «We were pretty dull.&Debate — NASA's Gavin Schmidt appeared so demoralized that he mused that debates equally split between believers of a climate «crisis» and scientific skeptics are probably not «worthwhile» to ever agree to again - Schmidt on his teams debate loss: «We were pretty dull.&debate loss: «We were pretty dull.»

That has to be the crux of the AGW debate, because people like Mielser can procrastinate about penguins, polar bears and heat devouring oceans (how AGW, which is an atmospheric phenomenon, can keep the air at the same temperature but cause the seas to warm is beyond comprehension!)

The debate over global warming centers on the extent to which gases released from the burning of fossil fuels — mainly carbon dioxide — are trapping the sun's heat in the Earth's atmosphere, creating a greenhouse effect.

The disclosure of the contents of over 1,000 e-mails and documents obtained illegally from the server at the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit is sparking heated debate across the blogosphere, leading to accusations from climate skeptics that scientists are trying to conceal evidence that contradicts anthropogenic global warming.

In the midst of heated debates over human - caused global warming, intelligent, knowledgeable people are now presenting evidence that global cooling is currently under way.

See also:: Shhhh, We've Got a Secret: Soil Solves Global Warming, Part 1,:: GM Food Debates Heats Up with Global Warming,:: The Argument against GMO Image: Yale Daily News

Avaroo, Dogz, I suggest you read the following from an article «Cold Snap Heating Up Global Warming Debate» in the UK:

The article acknowledged «concern» regarding «the connection between hurricanes and global warming,» but noted that although» [t] hat is a subject of a heated debate in the science community,» «Gore cited five recent scientific studies to support his view.»