Sentences with phrase «warming pause debate»

(Related: «Does Global Warming Pause Debate Miss Big Picture?»)

Not exact matches

Evidence of the «pause» in surface warming «has sparked a lively scientific and public debate», says the Nature Climate Change editorial.

So, within a period of a month or so, we learn, first, that the much debated global warming «pause» is real after all (regardless of what the cause might be, which remains uncertain), and second, that widely held assumptions regarding extreme weather events caused by AGW, such as droughts and flooding, are unfounded.

The public debate about the alleged «warming pause» was misguided from the outset, because far too much was read into a cherry - picked short - term trend.

And I don't often question your reasoning w / r / t the science, per se, but on your arguments w / r / t the social aspects of the debate and on a few occasions, the rhetoric of your scientific arguments (such as your acceptance of arguments about a «pause» in «global warming.»

The Weekend Australian lead editorial on «Global warming facts must give us all pause to think» references Judith's work and concludes after considering the pause that «The gatekeepers of scientific media and political debate should not be afraid of a discussion about the facts and their ramifications.

(See «Does «Global Warming Pause» Debate Miss Big Picture?»)

This has been especially so during the decade - long debate about the warming pause.

Nothing shows the true nature of one's position on agw than people who talk like the pause is of no importance to the agw debate simply because warming will probably resume in the future.

DEBATE about the reality of a two - decade pause in global warming and what it means has made its way from the sceptical fringe to the mainstream.

The so - called and much debated «pause» in global warming is over.

This lapse of temperature data of the ocean's interior led to the scientific question over whether the world hit a «global warming pause» in the early 2000s, which fueled debates in congress over whether climate change is real.

The paper was entitled «Why Models Run Hot» and sought to provide an explanation for the most salient fact about the climate - change debate: why the turn - of - the - century climate models were all wrong and failed to foresee the two - decade global - warming «pause».

Debate over whether the warming has really «paused» and the statistical significance of a trend over a short interval are basically debating points.