«Global
Warming Policies Reflect False Assumptions, Panelists Say,» The Heartland Institute, July 14, 2015.
Not exact matches
To some extent, the positions above
reflect or build on themes articulated by David G. Victor of the University of California, San Diego, in «Global
Warming Gridlock,» Roger A. Pielke, Jr., of the University of Colorado in «The Climate Fix, and the authors (including Pielke) of «The Hartwell Paper — a New Direction for Climate
Policy.»
But as the Economist notes, «[a] t the moment neither public
policies nor markets
reflect the risks of a
warmer world.»
If the lack of continuation of the previous
warming can't be accounted for, if there is no predictive capability within what we already know about climate, it makes no sense to be so conclusive about AGW, and therefore our
policy decisions should
reflect that uncertainty.
Climate change skeptics like James Taylor, environmental
policy fellow at the Heartland Institute, a conservative think tank, said the pushback in schools and legislatures
reflected public frustration at being told «only one side of the global
warming debate — the scientifically controversial theory that humans are creating a global
warming crisis.»