The Scientific Guide to Global
Warming Skepticism looks at both the evidence that human activity is causing global warming and the ways that climate «skeptic» arguments can mislead by presenting only small pieces of the puzzle rather than the full picture.
Not exact matches
-- is in contrast to the lede of the piece you tweeted out, «If you were
looking for ways to increase public
skepticism about global
warming, you could hardly do better than the forthcoming nine - part series on climate change and natural disasters.»
And, based on the latest studies on ECS plus the failure of
warming forecasts (such as Hansen 1988 or IPCC TAR and AR4), it
looks like my
skepticism has been well placed.
To put that in context, it can
warm 1 kilometer depth of water by 0.75 C. With that much forcing from CO2,
skepticism is like
looking at a steady hotplate accounting for the water in a pot heating, and saying no it must be something else.